Today's Paper Latest stories 🏈 High school scoreboard Obits Traffic Wally Hall Newsletters Weather Puzzles + games

The school shooting has become an American motif, a previously unthinkable option for the odd, the alienated and the spurned, a way to find voice through violence.

We had yet another one recently in Santa Fe, Texas, where a student killed 10 people and injured 13 others. After the shooting, Paige Curry, a student at the school, offered a chilling assessment of our current predication.

A television news reporter asked: "Was there a part of you that was like, 'This isn't real, this would not happen at my school?'"

Paige responded, shaking her head, an uncomfortable reflexive smile on her face that mocked the naïveté of the question: "No, there wasn't."

The reporter pressed: "Why so?"

Paige continued: "It's been happening everywhere. I've always kind of felt like eventually it was going to happen here too."

Schools across the country are preparing for this morbid eventuality. According to a 2015-16 Crime and Safety Survey by the National Center for Education Statistics, 92 percent of public schools have a written plan describing procedures to be performed in the event of an shooter.

According to Vox: "Since Columbine, 32 states have passed laws requiring schools to conduct lockdown drills or some form of emergency drill to keep students safe from intruders. Some states went even further after 20 children died in Newtown, Conn., in 2012. Now, six states require specific 'active shooter' drills each year."

These preparations--sheltering in place, ducking for cover, running for your life--have become a routine part of our children's educational experience. This is not normal and must never be accepted as such. Neither are these shootings normal. This is all insanity.

We have too many guns in this country, including too many based on combat weapons, and as a result we have too many shootings and deaths.

Many of us know this. We also know that legislators in Washington, as well as Donald Trump, are so beholden to the National Rifle Association that little to nothing will be done to stem the real problem: Guns and their availability.

Instead, politicians talk about tangential issues like the mentally ill, the hardening of soft targets like schools, and putting even more guns in people's hands, like the lunacy of arming teachers.

A main facet of Trump's campaign was the condemnation of violence in Chicago and what that said about the culture there.

As the Washington Post pointed out, Trump promised in his inauguration speech to end this "American carnage," but "gun deaths are up over 12 percent year-over-year. Firearm injuries are up nearly 8 percent. The number of children under the age of 12 shot by a gun has increased by 16 percent, while instances of defensive gun use are up nearly 30 percent." Yes, gun violence is actually on the rise.

As Time magazine pointed out in November, "Firearm-related deaths rose for the second-straight year in 2016."

The magazine continued: "In 2016, there were more than 38,000 gun-related deaths in the U.S.--4,000 more than 2015, the new CDC report on preliminary mortality data shows. Most gun-related deaths--about two-thirds--in America are suicides, but an Associated Press analysis of FBI data shows there were about 11,000 gun-related homicides in 2016, up from 9,600 in 2015. The increase in gun-related deaths follows a nearly 15-year period of relative stasis."

Furthermore, according to an April FBI report: "The FBI has designated 50 shootings in 2016 and 2017 as active shooter incidents. Twenty incidents occurred in 2016, while 30 incidents occurred in 2017." The state with the largest number of those shooters--six--is, you guessed it, Texas.

But as politicians in Washington have made clear that they have no desire to address this issue, no desire to stand up to the NRA, no desire to stop treating these deaths as collateral damage, those seeking change must change tactics.

People seeking common-sense gun control must become single-issue voters on gun control. Support for more restrictions may not be the only reason to vote for a candidate, but it must be sufficient to vote against one.

We have to stop waiting for politicians to display courage and instead start to instill fear in them.

As an individual voter, you don't need to have a slate of reforms in mind. You only have to vote consistently for candidates who are committed to reviewing the issue and advancing smart, effective policy.

This is now about the long game. The NRA didn't amass its clout overnight, and the building of a contingent of politicians committed to gun control also won't come overnight. But it can, and indeed must, be done. Students like Paige shouldn't simply assume that one day a fellow student will show up with a gun and an appetite for death, and that there is nothing Washington is willing to do to prevent it.

Editorial on 05/27/2018

Print Headline: A morbid American motif

Sponsor Content


You must be signed in to post comments
  • joedellinger3
    May 27, 2018 at 5:01 p.m.

    The odds of being murdered in the USA is one in sixteen thousand. The odds of school children being murdered at school is one in a million.

  • JakeTidmore
    May 27, 2018 at 5:58 p.m.

    Those odds are still not acceptable and I hope you're not callous enough to say you do accept such. Some things are simply not acceptable no matter what the odds are.

  • mozarky2
    May 27, 2018 at 6:49 p.m.

    It is also unacceptable to penalize law-abiding citizens for the actions of a few crazies...

  • JakeTidmore
    May 27, 2018 at 7:15 p.m.

    You mean like crazy gun nuts??

  • JakeTidmore
    May 27, 2018 at 7:55 p.m.

    Crazy folks with easy access to guns ready to use them to kill multiple victims?
    Is it too many guns that are too easy to get (which is the status quo now) or is it too few guns that are hard to get (which is oft the erroneous portrayal of gun control laws)? Is it any and all kinds of dangerous, lethal, or assault level weapons or is it some responsibility on the part of government, law enforcement, and the citizenry?
    And why don't we use the founding fathers' notion of a well-regulated militia instead of the NRA's barely regulated gaggle of people?
    Reasonable and well-regulated ownership is acceptable. Anything less is not. Less is what lets the crazies arm themselves so easily.

  • 23cal
    May 27, 2018 at 10 p.m.

    I'm frankly shocked that another school shooting could happen considering how many Republican politicians prayed and how many thoughts they sent after the last one.
    I'm kind of surprised our "well-regulated militia" is doing so many school massacres and mass shootings.