Today's Paper Search Latest Coronavirus Families Core values App Listen Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive
story.lead_photo.caption Little Rock School District Superintendent Michael Poore is shown in this file photo.

Negotiators for the Little Rock School District and the Little Rock Education Association on Tuesday reached a contract settlement that was quickly finalized by Arkansas Education Commissioner Johnny Key and the employee union members.

The 12-page agreement was announced just before 6:30 p.m. by Key, who acts in place of a school board in the state-controlled Little Rock district, which does not have a locally elected board.

The agreement was then unanimously ratified by about 200 association members who met at First United Methodist Church, association President Teresa Knapp Gordon said.

The agreement "clears a path for the Arkansas Department of Education to petition" the state Board of Education for a waiver from the Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act, a news release from the Education Department said.

"This agreement is a win for students," Key said in the Tuesday evening news release.

Key on Oct. 22 had rejected an earlier tentative agreement between the district and its employees union because he wanted support for a request to the state board for the waiver of employment protection laws in 22 district schools recently given state ratings of Ds and Fs.

He said at the time that academic progress at the schools was not satisfactory and that the process for removing incompetent teachers was too cumbersome. He also noted that state law allows the waiver of the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act in districts that are classified in the state's school accountability system as "Level 5-Intensive Support," which is the case for Little Rock.

"A waiver from the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act gives the Little Rock School District the flexibility it needs to expedite critical staffing decisions," Key said in the prepared statement, "especially in areas where student learning is directly impacted."

Only the state Board of Education can approve a waiver of the state law. That request for the district that has 3,581 employees -- including 1,917 employees on the teacher payroll -- could go to the state board as soon as its Dec. 13 meeting.

"The agreement also meets my commitment to providing due process for staff, and it strengthens the district's utilization of the Arkansas Teacher Excellence and Support System to drive instructional improvement," Key said, referring to the state and district's already existing teacher evaluation and improvement program.

Gordon said later Tuesday night that the language of the new agreement regarding the pursuit of a possible waiver of the employment protection laws doesn't mean the union supports a waiver.

"It just means that we recognize that [Key] could do it regardless of whether it's in the contract or not," she said, "because it is the state law and the [Professional Negotiated Agreement] doesn't trump state law."

Gordon said she hopes the Education Board will be "really thoughtful" in its consideration of a proposed waiver of the employment protections.

"As a professional I think waivers are dangerous," she said. "Those state laws and standards of accreditation are there to ensure a quality education and they should not be easily waived. I think it is damaging to our children when things are waived that are provided to assure there is a quality education."

Association members at the ratification meeting were initially tense and a little suspicious of the agreement "but at the end there was relief," Gordon said.

"Nobody wanted to take action during the holidays or be out in the cold," she continued.

"We are professionals. We want to do our jobs. We don't want to disrupt learning for our kids. But we are going to stand up for our kids, too. We are going to make sure things are right for our kids."

The newly approved agreement includes a new due-process clause and it enables the union to continue to be the exclusive bargaining agent for non-administrative employees in the district, including teachers, counselors, library/media specialists and support staff who are not state-licensed educators.

"We have a contract that allows us to represent our employees in whatever comes up," Gordon said. "If it is disciplinary, or if its contract negotiations or if a joint committee needs to be formed to talk about professional development or anything else -- we're at the table. It's important that our voices be heard and that we're part of discussions because we are the professionals."

The settlement occurred one day before the existing contract, or professional negotiated agreement, was to expire at midnight tonight.

The term of the new agreement is Nov. 1, 2018 to Oct. 31, 2019. The language in the agreement states that the "LRSD shall continue its recognition of the LREA throughout the term of this agreement and during negotiations for a successor agreement as long as it is deemed by the Board of Education to be in the best interest of the employees and the district."

The language is a combination of language sought by Key and by the association.

Regarding the employment laws, there is language under the "Board Authority" portion of the agreement that says: "Nothing in this agreement shall limit LRSD's statutory right to petition the state Board of Education for waivers pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated 6-15-103 or for the state Board of Education to take any action that may be permitted by A.C.A. 6-15-2916, including but not limited to a waiver of the [employment laws]. ... If the Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act and the Public School Employee Fair Hearing Act are waived, then the grievance policy provisions on non-renewals, terminations, and suspensions without pay shall go into immediate effect."

The contract language does not limit the proposed waiver request to just the district's 22 schools that have the D and F letter grades that Key has focused on. The district currently has 40 operating schools.

Under the Grievance Procedure section of the contract there is new language that states that grievances can be raised by an employee who has been recommended for nonrenewal of contract, termination or suspension. Those grievances will begin at level three of the grievance procedure, which is a hearing before the school board.

However the employee shall have the right to a meeting with the superintendent or the appropriate deputy superintendent prior to that Level 3 hearing.

The new due-process provision in the agreement states the district and union's commitment to ensuring due process for all employees. No disciplinary action shall take place without just cause, the agreement says, and any disciplinary action shall be appropriate to the behavior that precipitated such discipline.

Key said earlier in calling for waiver-related language in the contract that the Teacher Fair Dismissal Act process of removing a poorly performing employee can take as long as two years to follow all the required steps. Principals had reported to him that there were situations where they needed to make some staff moves but were hamstrung by the process.

He said it was not his intention that staffing changes be made in the midst of the current school year but in preparation for the following year.

He also said previously that the proposed waiver is not an attempt to bash teachers, that it would be used as a scalpel and not a chain saw. He also noted that the waiver might not apply just to classroom teachers but also to principals.

One of the new provisions in the agreement focuses on the Teacher Excellence Support System, known as TESS, that is used for supporting and developing effective teachers.

"TESS also is a tool that can be used to impact decisions on employees," the agreement says. "This system is designed to provide clear expectations on performance, provide guidelines with communication and time lines, utilize mentors, and create a transparent approach that is consistent for all teachers."

Other parts of the agreement are virtually unchanged from past years. Those include sections on sick and personal leave, salaries, benefits, and the overall grievance procedure.

The agreement is signed by Key, Gordon and Superintendent Mike Poore. Poore did not immediately return a message left Tuesday evening on his cellphone.

Photo by Jeff Mitchell
Johnny Key is shown in this file photo.

Metro on 11/14/2018

Print Headline: Little Rock School District, union strike a deal


Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • RBear
    November 14, 2018 at 7:17 a.m.

    This is more in line with what I was hoping for. The review process was not ditched. It has been expedited to help the teacher work with the administration on a corrective path. The fact it had to get to this point is what is disappointing. Both sides took an adversarial approach to this. No teacher should be under threat of being fired without a due process. No administrator should create an air of fear in the workplace that doesn't give employees a chance to improve.

  • Skeptic1
    November 14, 2018 at 8:13 a.m.

    17 billion dollars in their retirement fund, substandard education, and teachers that cannot be fired demanding more? Charter schools have a bright future.

  • hah406
    November 14, 2018 at 8:39 a.m.

    Hey fair is fair. You have a bunch of charter schools that have D and F grades reported in another story today. Maybe the state should take control of them, fire the teachers, or shut them down. But instead we coddle charters rather than hold them to the same standards.

  • JakeTidmore
    November 14, 2018 at 8:42 a.m.

    Lie #1 - Teachers cannot be fired in LRSD.

    This is NOT true. No evidence of such has been presented by Key or the Department of Education. I know from my experience with the district (and other Central Arkansas districts for that matter) that teachers can be and have been fired - all under the Fair Dismissal Act and with due cause. And in most cases, I know the reason why it happened. And when I had the information at hand, I felt such decisions were justified and were handled properly and legally.

    Bonnie Holmes - try not to lie when you write letters. Incompetent teachers can and have been fired. Fair Dismissal just means that proper procedures must be followed in doing so.
    Am reminded of how veterans were treated upon their return from Vietnam. Am seeing the same thing with teachers - reviled, metaphorically spit upon and castigated for much greater wrongs, the leaders receiving little of the blame and proclaiming their diligent efforts to do things "right".
    I'm ready right now to greet these maligned public school teachers and tell them what the Vietnam vets who were spat upon also now hear: Thank you for your service.
    Skeptic - swallow your spit and get a rein on your spite because you are operating under false information. (Maybe you'd be surprised to know that data shows that non-union states are less likely to dismiss teachers for cause then union states. Just saying.) And try to remember what Vietnam vets had to put up with before the public realized how wrongly they were treated. And maybe one day you'll be humble enough to thank a public education teacher for their service to our children and our nation.

  • BobfromMarion
    November 14, 2018 at 5:15 p.m.

    November 14, 2018 at 8:39 a.m.

    "Hey fair is fair. You have a bunch of charter schools that have D and F grades reported in another story today. Maybe the state should take control of them, fire the teachers, or shut them down. But instead we coddle charters rather than hold them to the same standards."

    Preach on! The most damaging facet of charter school regulations is that there is little state review. That would be fine if the vast majority of funds came from private funds. The state approved charter schools receive similar state money as traditional public schools in AR.

    What about the fact that the number of D and F rated schools in the Little Rock School District has increased considerably over the past two or so years? Key has served as the school board. Perhaps the state board should appoint someone else to be the new school board since Key appears incompetent to serve as the board. One idea floated is to allow the elected members of the board serve. Bad idea. That would mean democracy at work in Little Rock Schools. Perish the thought!!! I'm being a bit sarcastic here. Well, more than a bit!