Today's Paper Search Latest stories Traffic #Gazette200 Listen Weather Newsletters Most commented Obits Puzzles + Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Rep. Douglas House talks with Melissa Fults, a cannabis patient and medical marijuana advocate, during Wednesday’s testimony on a bill to add 39 more conditions that qualify for medical marijuana. “It’s dead,” House said after no one moved for a vote on the bill. Fults and other advocates expressed disappointment after the hearing. - Photo by Thomas Metthe

The effort to triple the number of conditions that qualify patients to use medical marijuana in Arkansas died Wednesday.

After nearly an hour of testimony before the House Rules Committee, House Bill 1150 by Rep. Douglas House, R-North Little Rock, failed to get even a motion to put the bill to a vote. The testimony included the state's top two health officials telling members that Gov. Asa Hutchinson opposed the legislation.

House, along with about a dozen patients, testified for the bill while the Arkansas Health Department director, Dr. Nathaniel Smith, and state Surgeon General Gregory Bledsoe testified against the measure.

"It's dead," House said afterward. "We presented the case. They heard it and don't feel like it needs to be done at this time."

The bill would increase the number of qualifying conditions for an Arkansas medical marijuana registry ID card from the current 18 to 57. The Health Department recently began issuing the cards in anticipation of the first dispensary opening in the coming months.

[RELATED: Complete Democrat-Gazette coverage of medical marijuana in Arkansas]

Also Wednesday, the Arkansas Medical Marijuana Commission approved three requests from dispensaries to move closer to population centers.

Arkansas became one of 33 states to legalize cannabis for medical use when voters in 2016 approved Amendment 98 to the Arkansas Constitution. Bureaucratic and legal delays have slowed the program's implementation, but the first cultivation facility has begun growing and dispensaries expect to begin opening in April.

House and patient advocates told the House Rules Committee that most patients are already purchasing the drug off the street. Adding more qualifying conditions, they said, would bring those people "out of the dark."

House also said his bill would prevent patients from lying to their doctors to get a recommendation for a cannabis card.

"We don't want to live in the dark," said Melissa Fults, a cannabis patient and advocate who uses the drug to treat asthma. "We want to follow the law."

The current qualifying conditions are: cancer, glaucoma, HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Tourette's syndrome, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, post-traumatic stress disorder, severe arthritis, fibromyalgia, Alzheimer's disease, cachexia, peripheral neuropathy, intractable pain, severe nausea, seizures and muscle spasms.

State Surgeon General Greg Bledsoe (left) and Nate Smith of the state Department of Health, on Wednesday spoke against the bill to widen the number of conditions eligible for medical marijuana treatment. Bledsoe and Smith cited a lack of research proving the effectiveness of cannabis and warned that some conditions could become worse when treated with marijuana products.
State Surgeon General Greg Bledsoe (left) and Nate Smith of the state Department of Health, on Wednesday spoke against the bill to widen the number of conditions eligible for medical marijuana treatment. Bledsoe and Smith cited a lack of research proving the effectiveness of cannabis and warned that some conditions could become worse when treated with marijuana products.

Smith and Bledsoe said they opposed the bill because there's a lack of scientific research showing cannabis' clinical effectiveness, and, in some cases, cannabis is associated with worsening conditions.

[RELATED: Complete Democrat-Gazette coverage of the Arkansas Legislature]

Smith also noted that there's already a process in place to add new qualifying conditions. Residents may petition the Health Department and submit supporting evidence to have a new condition added. That process has only been used once -- for bipolar disorder -- and it was rejected because state medical officials said that medical research doesn't support the use of cannabis to treat that disorder.

Smith and Bledsoe also testified that most of the symptoms that occur with the new conditions proposed in HB1150 are already covered by Amendment 98.

Smith added that while there is a process to add new conditions, there's no process to take conditions away. Smith, whose expertise is in infectious diseases, said that recent developments in the treatment of hepatitis C have found highly effective measures outside of cannabis, and that cannabis can actually increase the rate of liver damage.

However, hepatitis C remains a qualifying condition in Arkansas with 209 people with the disease approved for cannabis cards.

"I don't think those 209 patients know that daily marijuana use will accelerate liver damage, and I doubt the physician who signed off on the qualifying condition is fully aware of that as well because it's a qualifying condition and there's the Arkansas Department of Health logo on the top of that application," Smith said. "So I think we need to be very careful about what we add and subtract."

House said after Wednesday's meeting that Hutchinson's opposition loomed large.

"If the governor opposes it, that was probably persuasive to many committee members," House said. "If that's the case, I'm a little disappointed that the governor didn't get word to me."

Hutchinson, through a spokesman, said he was concerned about broadening the state's medical marijuana program before it gets off the ground.

"The reservation I have is that we are just now implementing the program and making medical marijuana available, and before we expand the program, we need to have more experience with it," the Republican governor said. "The existing legislation is broad enough that a physician who sees a legitimate need has the ability to issue a prescription.

"Rep. House has been a real leader in this area, and I respect his work tremendously."

House also said he didn't think patients would get fair consideration from the Health Department when petitioning it for new qualifying conditions.

Department officials, House said, told him two years ago that they wouldn't approve any new conditions.

Smith, in a Wednesday interview, said he would be open to adding new conditions if there was convincing medical evidence to do so.

"I consider these applications very seriously," he said.

At the Medical Marijuana Commission meeting, members approved three dispensaries' requests to move closer to more heavily populated areas.

• Grassroots OPCO will move from Ward in Lonoke County to Little Rock.

• NEA Full Spectrum Medicine will relocate from Rector in Clay County to Brookland in northern Craighead County.

• Fiddler's Green Marijuana Dispensary will remain in Stone County, moving about about 8 miles closer to the Mountain View city limits.

Patient advocates were extremely disappointed after the House Rules Committee meeting. Several said they felt the committee members weren't listening and had already made up their minds.

Fults said she wished the members would have at least voted on the bill, and she now plans to help get a constitutional amendment on the ballot in 2020 to legalize cannabis for recreational use.

"I swore I'd never fight for recreational," Fults said. "But the state has left us no alternative."

A Section on 02/14/2019

Print Headline: Bid to add to pot-use list nipped in bud by Arkansas House panel

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

You must be signed in to post comments

Comments

  • LR1955
    February 14, 2019 at 6:39 a.m.

    Gov Asa is for carrying guns openly or concealed w/ out any permit but against medical marijuana expanded coverage.
    Gov Asa is for income tax breaks for the upper brackets but increasing taxes on gasoline that affect all tax brackets.
    I wonder what the next issue is our illogical governor will jump into the middle of?

  • OzarkJim
    February 14, 2019 at 7:45 a.m.

    The failure of this bill is a good example why I moved away from Arkansas and the backward thinking of the politicians in Arkansas. Change is hard for most politicians in Arkansas because of the ultra-right wing of the Republican Party. This is a good example why many corporations do not invest in Arkansas based on the ultra conservative thinking.

    The train wreak in the White House is the beginning of the end of the Republican Party and that is not good thing but it looks like the leadership of the Republican Party has turned over control to "The Donald" who never was a Republican. What a bunch of "Lackies".

  • mrcharles
    February 14, 2019 at 7:47 a.m.

    Lr1955 good questions. Clearly the elites are making sure this whole pot matter is resisted by every roadblock that can be devised by the mind of men...those men who dont like what the voters did so will impose their "concerns" to move forward like snails.
    I can buy a gallon of whiskey , with all its benefits [ see daily news of that result] but whoa, let's be cautious with pot.

  • Skeptic1
    February 14, 2019 at 8:01 a.m.

    Absolutely shameful. All of the conditions they denied are valid and have literature to back it up. This is just more stall tactics by our woefully uneducated legislature, they should be ashamed as many patients have been waiting 2 1/2 years for relief, there is no excuse. It takes four DUI's in this state before it's felony...seriously?

  • BoudinMan
    February 14, 2019 at 8:14 a.m.

    And yet, these knuckle-draggers keep being re-elected.

  • limb
    February 14, 2019 at 8:17 a.m.

    I’d be glad for the science to catch up to shed more light.

  • GOHOGS19
    February 14, 2019 at 8:21 a.m.

    good decision. dope heads are disappointed I'm sure.

  • JiminyC56
    February 14, 2019 at 8:22 a.m.

    The state needs to put a recreational use amendment on the next ballot so the people that want to use can. I guarantee it would pass and we could save these legislators and officials, who seem to know what is good for us, alot of time and work in delaying the will of the people.

  • Skeptic1
    February 14, 2019 at 8:30 a.m.

    JiminyC56....excellent idea.

  • FollowDaMoney
    February 14, 2019 at 8:33 a.m.

    Too bad Arkies arent a little more like our neighbors in Oklahoma. They passed a law in June and already have dispensaries open. Over a thousand grows licensed. So they really planned to put one in Ward. Gimme a break. Why even submit an application when you can change anything you want after fooling the commission.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT