Today's Paper Search Latest In the news Traffic #Gazette200 Listen Digital replica FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles + Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

State Sen. Bob Ballinger of Hindsville wants to set a minimum wage in Arkansas the same way the electoral college has installed two second-place Republican presidents this century.

For that matter, it's now the same process by which Mike Maggio overruled common jurors in that nursing home case.

It's all based on a simple prevailing conservative Republican premise. It's that you can't trust official judgments formed by majorities of regular people because ... well, regular people, bless their hearts, don't know what's good for them.

Don't you understand that a partisan insider from a remote barren state chosen to be a presidential elector knows better who should be president than all those millions of actual American people living in places they don't have the good sense to leave, like California and New York and in and around Chicago?

Don't you understand that 12 jurors in Faulkner County aren't qualified to set the amount of money due a family because of negligent treatment of a loved one in a nursing home? Don't you see that a judge taking a bribe is much better-suited for an important decision like that? Don't you see that we need some "tort reform" to keep these regular people from going into those jury boxes and acting like they're in charge?


And now, by the right-wing Republican Ballinger's bill filed last week at the Capitol, you need also to understand that 68.5 percent of Arkansas voters in November were mired in cluelessness and didn't really understand what they were doing when they approved a higher minimum wage.

Surely you can grasp that they wouldn't have voted that way if they were more sophisticated in their thinking.

Ballinger's bill, SB115, is simple enough even for regular people to understand.

On that minimum wage increase the voters so overwhelmingly approved, it would exempt persons younger than 18 and employees of educational institutions, nonprofits and commercial enterprises with fewer than 50 workers.

As a publicly initiated law, the minimum wage increase could be altered only by a two-thirds majority vote of both legislative houses. Since Republicans are three-fourths of our current Legislature, there seems a reasonable chance the voters' declaration on a minimum wage will meet the same fate as the voters' declaration of a president in 2000 and 2016, not to mention the same fate as that $5.2 million jury verdict in that nursing home case that then-Judge Maggio, now of the federal pen, corrected down to $1 million.

Alas, some context about Ballinger seems appropriate.

In December it was reported that state government had filed a tax lien against him for nonpayment of a tax bill of about $1,700. He's had home mortgage payment issues over the years. He put out a statement in December that, as an attorney, he could make a lot of money but instead had chosen a life of public service and to trust that the Lord will provide.

That's not to say that Ballinger's Lord would provide a higher state minimum wage across the board as the voters decreed.

Formerly a House member, Ballinger ran for the Senate last year and took on Rep. Bryan King, a mercurial right-wing outsider populist. Ballinger had Gov. Asa Hutchinson's backing because King kept saying and doing wild things that got on Asa's nerves.

That is to make the point that we live in a state where Bob Ballinger can be the establishment moderate alternative.

King once voted against so-called tort reform. Maybe somebody needs to put in a bill saying the second-place candidate in the Ballinger-King race is the winner.

Meantime, another little bill filed by a right-wing Republican last week set off a social media firestorm.

Rep. Stephen Meeks of Greenbrier put in HB1177 to say that no employer could stick a microchip under an employee's skin without the employee's written permission.

The bill became a little less outrageous the more you learned about a trend in Sweden and an isolated instance in the United States. Employers installed microchips by which employees could pass security checks or have vending machine charges automatically taken from their accounts.

I'm not kidding here, though it surely must sound like it.

Meeks says he is merely seeking to be defensive and proactive should this practice ever reach Arkansas, and, in such an event, to protect employees from being chipped unless they want to be.

My initial take on the bill was that it was frightful. Then I thought it was silly.

Now I'm wondering if it is inadequate. Maybe it needs to be amended to ban human microchipping altogether in Arkansas, period.

After all, some of these regular people might not know any better than to agree to it.

------------v------------

John Brummett, whose column appears regularly in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, is a member of the Arkansas Writers' Hall of Fame. Email him at jbrummett@arkansasonline.com. Read his @johnbrummett Twitter feed.

Editorial on 01/20/2019

Print Headline: JOHN BRUMMETT: This is for your own good

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

You must be signed in to post comments

Comments

  • parajimbo
    January 20, 2019 at 9:09 p.m.

    WHO'S ON SECOND? "Maybe somebody needs to put in a bill saying the second-place candidate in the Ballinger-King race is the winner." I might argue then that would make Jim Wallace, the Democratic challenger in the general election, the winner. The purpose of the bill is to deny workers, under age 18 from benefitting from the recent hike (to $9.25 per hour effective Jan. 1, 2019) in the minimum wage voted for by the citizens AND going further workers aged 18 and under will be granted the previous mandated minimum wage increase to $8.50 (per 2014 referendum). This bill will reduce the minimum wage in fact to the federal minimum of $7.25. On this point, it diminishes the referendum that was mandated by the people in November 2018 by excluding class of citizens and can be used retroactively to reduce wages. This class is identified only by age and does not take into account skills or experience. The state senator's argument is: ""I totally get the people voted," Ballinger said. "I really don't think the people intended to put their mom-and-pop businesses out of business. They didn't want to shut down ministries and nonprofits, they didn't want to make it where if a business wants to take a chance on a 16-year-old kid, they have to pay him $11 an hour. That wasn't the intent." In contemplating the business acumen of the state senator's words, any small business teetering on failure due to the expense margin of youth on their payroll needs to adopt a new business plan. Targeting the riskiness of 16-year-olds without citing any sources for such a statement about this class of worker strikes me as patently offensive. When I and many others I know were 16 we worked jobs that required brain and brawn which were appropriate to the needs. Some of us were fast learners too, which we know can compensate for some of the experience of our older counterparts. Any prospective employee at any age comes with a skill set, a history and chances for success. These minimum wage increases are still a far cry from producing a living wage which can be essential to supplement their families' income. For others the increase in wages might make the difference in a youth's ability to save up to buy their first vehicle at which time their value to the work world increases significantly. Still others, who don't hoard their wealth in overseas accounts (just kidding of course) can be expected to spend more in their local economy which will benefit - - - oh! those mom and pop businesses.

  • joebub61yahoocom
    January 21, 2019 at 9:45 p.m.

    I read Johnny’s empathetic, pathetic kissup opinion on jaded Hillary before the election. He shed a tear or two on that walk away from the disrupted celebration. He lost his shot at being inside the dynasty. I remember the ringing of hands and predictions of just how much of a landslide was possible for Hillary. Well the Electoral College determined that farce. How could the polls have been so wrong. Trump himself did not think he would win. As I have said before, Hillary asked Trump condescenly if he would accept the results of the election. He did.

  • limb
    January 21, 2019 at 9:56 p.m.

    What does this have to do with Ballinger’s bill?

  • joebub61yahoocom
    January 21, 2019 at 11:21 p.m.

    Limb, Johnnyray is Brummett. He still thinks Al Gore should have been President.

  • joebub61yahoocom
    January 21, 2019 at 11:34 p.m.

    Oh, by the way bear. I see you got the work done early and became your usual obnoxious opiniated absolutely amazing, statistically stunning, I’m shaking my head right now, Dummy!!!

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT