Today's Paper Latest Elections Coronavirus 🔵 Covid Classroom Cooking Families Core values Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive
story.lead_photo.caption In this file photo soybeans are planted in Jefferson County. ( Arkansas Democrat-Gazette file photo / Staton Breidenthal)

Arkansas farmers have received nearly $281 million in government payments to make up for losses suffered during the ongoing trade war with China, according to federal records.

Twelve Arkansas farmers or farming entities received $500,000 or more, according to data compiled by the Environmental Working Group, a Washington nonprofit, after it filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. More than 100 Arkansas farming operations received at least $250,000 under the USDA's Market Facilitation Program.

About 300 received payments ranging from $125,000 to $249,999, according to the Environmental Working Group's data of payments through the end of April.

Fourteen Arkansas farming entities rank in the top 100 recipients nationwide in tariff-relief payments, according to the data.

[SEARCH: Arkansas farms that received tariff-relief aid »]

As of June 17, payments to Arkansas farmers totaled $280.9 million, according to the state office of the Farm Service Agency, a USDA branch helping administer the aid program.

Last August, when the USDA announced the startup of the $12 billion Market Facilitation Program, the agency alluded to a cap of $125,000. "MFP payments are also capped per person or legal entity at a combined $125,000 for corn, cotton, sorghum, soybeans and wheat," the USDA said in its Aug. 27 news release. Similar caps were set for dairy and swine payments.

But the agency paid out nearly $2.8 million to a Missouri soybean-growing operation registered as three entities at the same address, according to another analysis of the USDA data by The Associated Press. More than $900,000 went to three other farm businesses -- in Indiana, Illinois and Tennessee -- and two to farms in Texas. Three other farming operations collected more than $800,000. Sixteen more collected more than $700,000. And the data list more than 3,000 recipients who collected more than the $125,000 cap, according to the AP.

Farm aid offsets trade war losses
Farm aid offsets trade war losses

The USDA wound up allowing payments exceeding $125,000 to individual farming operations with multiple partners or legal entities "actively engaged" in farming.

Soybean payments in Arkansas so far total $247.7 million, according to the Farm Service Agency in Arkansas. Payments for cotton are at $30.7 million.

Other totals are corn ($909,859), wheat ($761,677), sorghum ($350,570), hogs ($269,668) and dairy ($105,878). While farmers had a May 17 deadline to file for the aid, some payments likely are still in the pipeline, according to the Arkansas Farm Service Agency office.

The largest payment in Arkansas, of $744,169, was made to TMG Farms of Wabash in Phillips County. TMG, according to USDA records, had received just shy of $700,000 for the tariffs' effect on cotton sales. The farm received another $44,048 for soybean losses and $438 for corn losses.

Tariff relief consisted of $4.7 billion in an initial first round of direct payments to producers of soybeans, cotton, corn, sorghum, wheat, pork and dairy, based on actual 2018 yields. The soybean payments were set at $1.65 a bushel. Prices for the other crops and commodities were set at far lower per-unit levels, such as corn at 1 cent per bushel.

Soybean farmers have especially been hit hard in the United States' trade dispute with China, which placed high tariffs on its importation of American soybeans and all but quit buying a commodity that is used mainly as feed for its burgeoning swine industry.

The $1.65-a-bushel rate was seen by the government as a reflection of what the Chinese tariffs cost U.S. soybean farmers in sales, but it doesn't cover losses of as much as 85 cents a bushel brought on by other factors, said H. Scott Stiles, an economist with the University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service who is based at Arkansas State University.

Record-setting yields in the U.S. and Brazil have resulted in a large surplus of soybeans, bringing down market prices, Stiles said. "Just a lot of things came together," he said.

The tariff-relief program didn't take into account those losses or the financial costs of "regional issues" such as a rain-delayed harvest in Arkansas that damaged a lot of farmers' late-planted soybeans, Stiles said.

Damaged or discolored soybeans get per-bushel discounts, or penalties, at grain elevators. "The worst case I heard was $3 a bushel," Stiles said, referring to the discounted beans.

Sarah Graddy, a spokesman for the Environmental Working Group, said the tariff-relief program and other subsidy programs benefit the largest, wealthiest farms in America. "This is not a safety net to save family farms," she said.

Graddy also said the tariff-relief program is a political solution to a problem created by President Donald Trump's administration. "He's throwing taxpayers' dollars at a problem he created with tariffs and the trade war with China," she said. "This is not a program aimed at protecting small farms from losses or from going out of business."

The aid program included another $1.2 billion in commodity purchases, mainly of fruits, nuts and vegetables for distribution to food banks, and $200 million in promoting international trade.

In late May, the Trump administration unveiled a second round of aid for farmers, this time for $16 billion. Direct payments will total $14.5 billion.

The aid to food banks and similar organizations will amount to $1.4 billion. Trade promotions will get another $100 million.

The amount "is in line with the estimated impacts of unjustified retaliatory tariffs on U.S. agricultural goods and other trade disruptions," the USDA said.

The price of soybeans in the U.S. dropped to as low as $8.03 a bushel earlier this year. The 52-week high was $9.11 a bushel.

USDA data provided to the AP through May 31 show that nearly 578,000 Market Facilitation Program applicants had received aid payments, with 83% of the dollars -- $7.1 billion -- going to soybean producers. The second-most-subsidized commodity under the program was cotton, nearly 6% of the total at $480.2 million.

Most payments were not large. The average for soybeans was $16,976; for cotton, $13,637; and for corn, $385, the AP reported. But the averages were pushed up by a number of high payments. The median payments paint a better picture of what most farmers got because half got more and half got less. They were $6,438 for soybeans; $3,194 for cotton; and $152 for corn. Nearly 60,000 applicants received less than $200, while nearly 5,000 received less than $10.

The USDA has projected net farm income this year will fall by $9.8 billion, to $65.7 billion, a 13% drop from 2017.

A Section on 07/03/2019

[SEARCH: Arkansas farms that received tariff-relief aid »]

Print Headline: U.S. pays Arkansas farms $281M on tariff losses; 12 got $500,000 or more


Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • Jfish
    July 3, 2019 at 8:31 a.m.

    Sarah Graddy, a spokesman for the Environmental Working Group, said the tariff-relief program and other subsidy programs benefit the largest, wealthiest farms in America. "This is not a safety net to save family farms," she said.
    I agree with the premise of the tariffs, however, as usual, the big agri-businesses (farming corporations) are then picked as winners which is wrong.

  • GeneralMac
    July 3, 2019 at 9:24 a.m.

    If the money is to compensate for loss revenue due to drop in price per bushel.....

    Those producing the MOST bushels are those that suffered the greatest loss.

    Thus, they SHOULD be getting the biggest checks.

  • ahelms
    July 3, 2019 at 10:05 a.m.

    Trump socialism.

  • mrcharles
    July 3, 2019 at 10:11 a.m.

    but remember big agri-business [ like the military-industrial complex] is a people and has feelings and a family to feed, so in our capitalistic society not wanting to be a commie where the government shares the sweat of others with you for your failings, we must stand firm and help our big farmers live the american dream. Mean while, other small businesses struggling due to the tariffs, can just "eat cake"!

    I think this is akin to alaska and its way of siphoning money from oil companies for the benefit of its citizens to get a check just for being a citizen.

    Guess capitalism and mericans of the gop ILK can be proud of the way things work out for people who hate commies/socialist.

    Many of a family farmer uses these hand outs to enable them to go pheasant/quail hunting out of state-- I have seen their hundred dollar bills lining their wallets. Such a sweet deal.

  • mrkohl
    July 3, 2019 at 10:45 a.m.

    What happen to the "free market"? How many of these farmers voted republican and for "smaller government"? Some old crap. This County is run by and for big business.

  • 3WorldState1
    July 3, 2019 at 11:30 a.m.

    This socialism just shows how ill informed republican voters are. Dems need to hammer this kind of thing. SS, Medicaid, guaranteed loans, eco dev, Defense, Police, disaster relief and many more. All “socialism”. Or as some say Dem Socialism. This is all easy to understand.

  • davisdds
    July 3, 2019 at 12:01 p.m.

    To 3worldstate1; I have you know, SS is not socialism, I worked almost every day since I was 14 and paid into the social security fund for over 55 years. So don't tell me it's a handout from the government!

  • WhododueDiligence
    July 3, 2019 at 12:10 p.m.

    "Or as some say Dem Socialism."
    Yes, some say that a lot. Will they now say Trumpist Repub Socialism? Or aren't they allowed to say that?

  • conservative
    July 3, 2019 at 12:28 p.m.

    Also, Social Security is NOT an "entitlement" in the sense that most Liberal
    Socialist Democrats believe . . .that being an entitlement to something that a recipient has NOT worked for, contributed to, or other wise "qualified" to receive.
    SS is a ROI benefit that a qualified recipient has paid-in to the government, and now benefit from the return of monies previously contributed.
    Stop calling SS an entitlement!

  • 3WorldState1
    July 3, 2019 at 12:29 p.m.

    Davis. Not responding to the other Dozen socialist programs (funny how u forgot about those)...I’ll do you the favor of responding to your opinion. Then you can answer to the other socialist programs.
    SS, while we all pay in, most will consume much more than they put in before they die. That “extra” which is a ton ( you do the research) is paid by the rest of Americans. Hence, socialism. And I am happy to do so, even for you. Because I care about my fellow Americans. Medicaid is also one of these programs - We all pay in, most get more than they put in.
    Now, please respond to all the other gov socialist policies I mentioned (there are many more) and let us all know, Are we a socialist country now, under Trump? Or will we be if there is Medicaid for all? Is that the tipping point? Just hard to understand Republicans thinking because they seem to just spout Fox - Rush talking points, when the the opposite is the truth. Please help explain. Or is it, Republicans socialism is not socialism but Dems socialism is socialism? You can see why I am confused.