Today's Paper Search Latest App In the news Traffic #Gazette200 Paper Trails Listen Digital FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles/Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption A screenshot from a livestream of a Little Rock board meeting.

UPDATE [7:45 p.m.]

The Little Rock Board of Directors has approved legislation to create the River Market Entertainment District, allowing open containers of alcohol to be carried outdoors in a specified area of downtown.

Some city directors and one resident who spoke against the measure, citing concerns about drunk driving and juvenile mischief. Gabe Holmstrom, executive director of the Downtown Little Rock Partnership, spoke in favor of such districts and said that other municipalities he had spoken to who had them did not experience increased problems with youth drinking.

Mayor Frank Scott Jr. has pushed for the measure, saying it would help people enjoy the "flavor" of Little Rock's downtown.

City directors did not approve an emergency clause with the ordinance, so the measure will not go into effect for 30 days.

Read Wednesday's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.

UPDATE [7 p.m.]

City directors approved an ordinance to establish an independent citizen review board for the Little Rock Police Department.

The five-member body will review police actions and investigations in the areas of corruption, discrimination and use of force. Members would receive training overseen by Police Chief Keith Humphrey and have the ability to call in forensic witnesses.

Mayor Frank Scott Jr. had pushed for a review board for months, and at Tuesday's meeting the measure got support from Sen. Joyce Elliott (D-Little Rock) and gun safety advocate Eve Jorgensen. The department's two police unions, the Fraternal Order of Police and the Black Police Officers Association, were opposed.

The board was split, and Scott voted for the measure to break the tie.

[Video not showing up above? Click here to watch » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDkaKGLro4M]

An attorney representing the Little Rock Fraternal Order of Police has urged the city Board of Directors to vote down a proposed ordinance that would establish an independent board to review police conduct.

In a letter dated Monday obtained by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, lawyer Chad Cumming told city directors that the FOP chapter believes there is no need for a citizen’s review board in any form, as its purpose is already accomplished by other review mechanisms including the city’s Civil Service Commission.

Cumming argued that the proposed review board ordinance leaves out important details about its operations and investigative powers.

A vote on the review board is on city directors’ agenda for its 6 p.m. meeting. Mayor Frank Scott Jr. has said that the five-member body investigating complaints of corruption, discrimination and use of force by the Little Rock Police Department would strengthen police-community relationships and provide an outlet where complaints can be heard.

Police Chief Keith Humphrey said he believed review boards would become mandatory in the coming years. The Civil Service Commission investigates use of force complaints but not corruption or discrimination, according to the city.

Little Rock Fraternal Order of Police president Ronnie Morgan opposed the creation of a board in a statement last week.

Document

FOP letter to city board

View

Cumming said in the letter that the proposed ordinance as written does not respect the separation of powers, as review board members would be chosen by the mayor and report directly to him, leaving city directors with no oversight powers.

Additionally, Cumming said, the proposed ordinance does not include legal limitations on what the review board is authorized to review or any measure guaranteeing officers due process rights.

“This will hinder police action and make our city less safe,” he wrote.

Check back for updates and read Wednesday’s Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • Foghorn
    July 23, 2019 at 5:08 p.m.

    I’ve said it before and will say it again: If the FoP opposes it, it must be a good idea. Their job is to hold others accountable but oppose any accountability on their own part. Just like all unions.

  • FollowDaMoney
    July 23, 2019 at 5:20 p.m.

    Second that. Hopefully the city not only approves it, but puts REAL people on it and give their decisions some weight.

  • 3WorldState1
    July 23, 2019 at 5:24 p.m.

    I bet they do.

  • NoUserName
    July 23, 2019 at 5:32 p.m.

    "If the FoP opposes it, it must be a good idea"
    .
    a =/= b
    .
    "puts REAL people on it and give their decisions some weight."
    .
    Like who? And what kind of weight? Do you think the FoP point about lack of due process is valid?
    .
    While I'm not surprised the FoP opposes it, as I posted elsewhere, the DOJ said one of the biggest issues in whether this would be a success or make things worse was getting all parties on the same page. Not surprisingly, given that the ordinance became public a week ago for a yes/no vote scheduled today, I don't think we're off to a good start. As a comparison, the Chief took a few months to get this in order in Norman.

  • GeneralMac
    July 23, 2019 at 6:30 p.m.

    Will the committee members believe LYING eye witness or EVIDENCE that contradicts eye witness?

    Ferguson Missouri......eye witness "hands in the air when shot "

    A lie !

    Minnesota...eye witness..." shot while hand cuffed"......
    A lie

    Just because liberal politicians, Black athletes, and movie actors believed the LIES it did not make it true.

  • reality1963
    July 23, 2019 at 6:55 p.m.

    Thugs rule under new mayor! Welcome to lil Memphis!

  • NoUserName
    July 23, 2019 at 7:04 p.m.

    Mayor breaks the tie and it passes. Personally, I think the mistake will be fast tracking it rather than taking the time to get it right. And the result will be something that will not be what many think it will. Time will tell.

  • NoUserName
    July 23, 2019 at 7:17 p.m.

    Wait, who abstained then? For: Webb, Hendrix, Richardson, Peck. Against: Kumparis, Hines, Adcock. I didn't hear the vote for Wyrick or Fortson. But I do think I heard the word tie and the mayor say it's a yes from him.

  • GeneralMac
    July 23, 2019 at 7:27 p.m.

    Soon it won't be just New York City where policemen hang their heads and let thugs have their way with them .

  • GeneralMac
    July 23, 2019 at 7:29 p.m.

    A shame what OUR capital city has become !

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT