Today's Paper Search Latest New app In the news Traffic #Gazette200 Paper Trails Listen Digital replica FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles + Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Excess water pours out of the dam on Keystone Lake northwest of Tulsa on May 24. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released millions of gallons of water from rain-swollen Oklahoma reservoirs into the Arkansas River, causing severe flooding in Arkansas. Gov. Asa Hutchinson is calling for a review of how the release was handled.

As his office begins assessing and repairing the damage left by historic flooding along the Arkansas River, Gov. Asa Hutchinson said he wants federal officials to review the management of water flows that caused devastation across Arkansas.

Hutchinson said he hopes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will complete an "after-action review" of the weeks leading up to the release of millions of gallons of water in Oklahoma that destroyed and damaged homes and infrastructure across Arkansas.

"We've got to look at our coordination with the [U.S. Army] Corps in Oklahoma," Hutchinson told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette last week. "I think the presumption is they've managed it well in terms of water flow, but the fact is, they're managing the water in Oklahoma for flood control and recreational purposes. Was it managed in the right way to balance the flooding results across Oklahoma and Arkansas?"

Laurie Driver, a spokesman for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Little Rock, said controlling water flow is a complicated process and engineers had no choice but to release the floodwaters after rains filled and overfilled flood-prevention reservoirs in Oklahoma.

Nathaniel Keen, chief of water management for the Corps in Little Rock, said the Corps intends to complete an after-action review on the Arkansas River flooding and that the report will be released to the public. Keen said the review likely will take a year.

An after-action review is a mandatory assessment of any event above a certain threshold with the intention of identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the Corps' response strategy, said Jim Marple, an emergency management planner with the Corps.

"The review encompasses all of the actions taken during the flood event to include emergency response and McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System operations during the flood event," Marple said.

The report will be sent to the Corps' regional office before it is released to the public, he said.

Driver said to understand the release of the water from the Oklahoma flood-prevention reservoirs, one needs to understand how much rain Oklahoma received.

"In the last 180 days, the White River Basin received 25 to 50 inches of rain," Driver said. "Sixty percent of that watershed are below our dams, so there's uncontrolled runoff. We kept waiting for that dry time so we can make water releases. If you get 3 to 4 inches [of rain] every week, the level stays up."

Driver said the Corps' water-release strategy is dictated by the congressionally approved water-control plan, which forced it to release water ahead of an influx of water to Keystone Lake in Oklahoma.

"They only let out, with this flood, as little as they could to keep their lakes from topping," Driver said. "If those dams hadn't been there, this would have been a lot worse."

Corps Hydraulic engineer Matt Moix identified heavy incoming rain May 21 from a weather forecast as a potential threat to the filled reservoirs, and Keen said his office began notifying people of the danger.

"The first call I made was to our public affairs office, then to our emergency management office, and my third call was to my wife to ask her to cancel all of our social engagements for the next few weeks," Keen said. "It was a very busy day for all of us."

Keen said he made more than 20 phone calls that day about the coming flood.

"I usually finished most calls with something like: 'Tell everyone you know. We are putting out press releases, social media posts, and calling people but that isn't enough. We need your help. Spread the news to your friends and enemies, this will be historic,'" he said.

Hutchinson said that when his office was first notified of the water releases, he knew the event would be historic.

Gov. Asa Hutchinson talks with residents before a May 30 news conference on flooding in Fort Smith. Hutchinson said he met with many Arkansans as he viewed the flood damage and that he found their spirit of determination and helpfulness inspiring.
Gov. Asa Hutchinson talks with residents before a May 30 news conference on flooding in Fort Smith. Hutchinson said he met with many Arkansans as he viewed the flood damage and that he found their spirit of determination and helpfulness inspiring.

"They said they were going to have to be moving water in quantities we've never seen before down the Arkansas River, and to be prepared," Hutchinson said. "He was actually speaking of whether we should have mandatory evacuations. That conversation gets your attention."

Hutchinson said he met with the Arkansas Department of Emergency Management to get the operations center fully manned and ready.

"A.J. Gary did an amazing job with that, with having every agency of state government and the relevant federal agencies all there simultaneously working together," Hutchinson said.

Then Hutchinson began coordinating and deploying the National Guard and rescue teams while ensuring federal officials were aware of the situation in Arkansas.

"I think our [disaster] declaration went through so quickly -- and it did go through in record time -- because the president was briefed early on what was happening here," Hutchinson said.

On June 8, President Donald Trump approved Hutchinson's request to declare a major disaster in Arkansas fewer than 24 hours after the governor made the request.

Twelve counties have been approved to receive federal aid because of extensive damage. They are Arkansas, Conway, Crawford, Desha, Faulkner, Jefferson, Logan, Perry, Pope, Pulaski, Sebastian and Yell.

As rising waters on the Arkansas River began to crest, however, Hutchinson said he needed to get out to see the flood and talk with residents affected by flooding.

"The reason it's important is to be able to provide credibility to our assessment of damages whenever I requested a disaster declaration from the president," he said. "It makes a difference when I've seen it and observed it. So, I was there in Van Buren and of course in Toad Suck and that area around Lollie Bottoms there."

Hutchinson said he met church members who had canceled Sunday morning services to fill sandbags in Dardanelle. He saw the creek that normally drains Lake Conway running backward from the Arkansas River, putting a levee in danger of breaching. He flew over inundated areas and saw the damage to homes, businesses and infrastructure.

And he met people. Many, many people, he said.

"In the Conway area, there was a homeowner who knew the home is sometimes flooded," Hutchinson said. "They had a pattern of going to a neighbor's home at a higher elevation. The only problem is, this flood covered the homeowner and the neighbor's home both."

A farmer asked if the governor could help him feed his cattle, which were surrounded by water in a field. National Guard troops used a helicopter to fly out 1,000-pound round bales to the cows the next day.

"You sequence your operations so that you protect life, protect property and the animals that are out there and impacted as well," Hutchinson said. "I was happy we were able to help him."

As often as he met people who were devastated by flooding, Hutchinson said he was just as likely to meet people who had rushed to the aid of their neighbors.

"It's inspiring," Hutchinson said. "You see football teams and grandmothers and grandsons all pitching in. While it's such a terrible, tragic circumstance we're going through, at the same time it's a learning experience for a new generation to see what it means to help a neighbor, to give of themselves. That has value. It brings, even in difficult circumstances, a community together."

As the flooding began to recede, Hutchinson said his office has been urging people to report damage and record their losses so that FEMA and others can help them.

"That's what we're going to learn more about every day as the water recedes," Hutchinson said. "As people are getting back to their homes and go back to their farms, they're going to see damage they either didn't know about or the magnitude is greater. The key thing is everybody needs to report the damage and have it assessed appropriately."

Hutchinson said the amount of damage that has been done to the state's infrastructure grows every day as water levels normalize and assessors can inspect roads and bridges.

"The embankments, the many places that've been eroded, the cost of that will be significant to repair," he said. "The farms, that's where you really hurt for the farmer. The first question is, once the farm dries out, is it too late to plant another crop with the damage from the silt?

"In previous experience, my experience as governor, they've been able to replant. Here, with the damage from the flood itself to the farm, replanting is a greater question.

"That's something we can only measure in time."

SundayMonday on 06/16/2019

Print Headline: Arkansas governor vexed by water release as flood tactic

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

You must be signed in to post comments

Comments

  • RBBrittain
    June 16, 2019 at 8:14 a.m.

    All this article proves is Asa knows NOTHING about operating flood control dams. As the Corps said, they had no choice but to release the water; otherwise it would have overtopped the dams and caused dam breaks leading to even MORE floodwaters in Arkansas.

  • RBBrittain
    June 16, 2019 at 8:22 a.m.

    Even as it was, there were worries about Webbers Falls Lock & Dam in Oklahoma failing after two runaway barges from Muskogee hit the dam despite efforts to secure them, much like the runaway barge that took out the I-40 bridge there years ago. (Luckily for Sallisaw & Fort Smith, undertow from the dam sank both barges shortly after they hit it; the dam held.)

  • wolfman
    June 16, 2019 at 10:38 a.m.

    the governor is trying to be an expert in an area he isn't. why do politicians do that? smh

  • mrcharles
    June 16, 2019 at 11:52 a.m.

    Can we not put tariffs on Oklahoma?

  • CartoonDude
    June 16, 2019 at 12:43 p.m.

    "Asa Hutchinson said he wants federal officials to review the management of water flows that caused devastation across Arkansas." How do people see fault in that?

  • Jfish
    June 16, 2019 at 1:35 p.m.

    After reading the article, I think the word vexing might be a little strong.

  • limb
    June 16, 2019 at 2:41 p.m.

    Agree

  • TheBatt
    June 16, 2019 at 4:39 p.m.

    Asa is right to question the Corps procedures. But he us barking up the wrong tree. The flooding was exacerbated by the LATENESS of water release from Keystone. The Corps succumbed to environmental nazis and refused to do the old early Spring draw-down. So when the cray rsin cycles came, the lake was already near maximum capacity. No storage capacity remaining... The reservoir wasn't being used for its primary legal purpose- flood mitigation. So they opened gates at the time when the river was already flooding, adding to the flood levels.

  • MBAIV
    June 16, 2019 at 8:19 p.m.

    Ah -- instant hatred for Asa/conservatives/Republicans.
    .
    What he wants the Corps to look into and answer for are the decisions regarding the pool levels prior to the heavy rains. Where the pools drawn down so that they could handle the spring rains? Or where they kept higher to favor the summer recreation season? It seems that the latter occurred.
    .
    The MK Navigation System/Arkansas River is NOT a flood control system. The purpose of the dams at the lock and dam sites is to maintain the 9 foot navigation depth. During the flooding, almost all gates at the river dams were open to allow water through. Go look at the video of the barges hitting the Weber Falls L&D and you'll see that the gates are fully open (UP). Sallisaw and Ft Smith were in no danger due to the dam strike. Perhaps knowing something about flood control dams vs non-flood control dams would help.

  • MBAIV
    June 16, 2019 at 8:40 p.m.

    More fat finger/voice typing from me --- second paragraph should have been:
    ,
    What he wants the Corps to look into and answer for are the decisions regarding the pool levels prior to the heavy rains. Were the pools drawn down so that they could handle the spring rains? Or were they kept higher to favor the summer recreation season? It seems that the latter occurred.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT