Today's Paper Search Latest In the news Traffic #Gazette200 Restaurant Transitions Listen Digital replica FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles + Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/STATON BREIDENTHAL --3/11/19-- Sen. Alan clark, R-Lonsdale, speaks Monday in the Senate about events in a committee meeting last week. - Photo by Staton Breidenthal

State lawmakers would be limited to 12 years in office under a proposed constitutional amendment that the Senate is scheduled to consider Monday.

Senate Joint Resolution 15, by Sen. Alan Clark, R-Lonsdale, cleared the Senate State Agencies and Governmental Affairs Committee last Tuesday. If approved by the Senate and then the House, the proposal would go on the November 2020 general election ballot. No action by the governor is required.

Under Amendment 94 to the Arkansas Constitution approved by voters in 2014, lawmakers are now limited to serving up to 16 years in the House or Senate or of combined service in both chambers. Senate terms are four years and House terms are two years. Senators who draw a two-year term after once-a-decade legislative redistricting are eligible to serve that term beyond the 16-year limit.

Under SJR15, state lawmakers elected after Jan. 1, 2021, would be limited to 12 consecutive years in the House, Senate or both. The two-year Senate term related to redistricting would be included in that total.

Also under the resolution, lawmakers now in office who serve 16 years (or 18 years because of Senate redistricting) would become eligible for subsequent service in the General Assembly but only once they are out of office for four years.

SJR15 isn't the only proposal to limit terms.

[RELATED: Complete Democrat-Gazette coverage of the Arkansas Legislature]

On March 14, the private Arkansas Term Limits ballot committee filed its own proposed constitutional amendment that would set the maximum at 10 years. That proposal is similar to the committee's last one that the Arkansas Supreme Court struck from the November 2018 ballot in October. To get its latest proposal on the 2020 ballot, the committee will have to collect more than 89,000 valid signatures of registered voters.

The latest Arkansas Term Limits' proposal would limit lawmakers to three two-year House terms; no more than two four-year terms as a senator; or any term that if served would exceed 10 years in the General Assembly. The two-year redistricting term in the Senate would be used in calculating the 10-year limit. Service in the General Assembly on or after Jan. 1, 1993, would be included in the calculation.

A 10-year term limit for Arkansas lawmakers would be the nation's strictest. California and Oklahoma limit lawmakers to 12 years.

Arkansas lawmakers can refer up to three proposed constitutional amendments to voters in the 2020 general election.

They've approved one so far, House Joint Resolution 1018, by Rep. Jeff Wardlaw, R-Hermitage, that would permanently extend the half-percent sales tax for highways. That tax was originally approved by voters in 2012 for a 10-year period.

Of SJR15, Clark told the Senate committee that his proposal was aimed at protecting good government in Arkansas.

"There is nowhere good government is more important than the people's branch, the Legislature," he said.

"If we don't do something and do it right, someone else is going to do it and do it wrong, so the most important thing is that we do the 12 years [and] that we do the four-year sit-out."

"I certainly don't want to come back. When I'm gone, I'm gone," said Clark, who has been in the Senate since 2013.

He said that about 5 percent of lawmakers return in states with term-limit provisions allowing legislators to return after temporarily sitting out.

"I don't think there is anything wrong with the 16 years [limit under Amendment 94]. But there has been talk ever since the ethics amendment [which was included in Amendment 94] that it was deceptive and I offered an amendment the very next session and have been ever since," he said.

Amendment 94 did more than change term limits.

The amendment also barred state lawmakers from accepting certain gifts, such as meals and drinks in one-on-one meetings, from lobbyists; prohibited direct corporate and union contributions to candidates; and extended the one-year waiting period to two years before former lawmakers can register as lobbyists for private clients.

Amendment 94 also created a citizens commission to set the salaries of state elected officials. The salaries were previously determined by the Legislature.

Clark said SJR15 "takes us to 12 years total, which is only two years longer than what Arkansas Term Limits had offered," and would allow lawmakers to gain experience to actually make a difference and get things done without becoming "career politicians."

Before Amendment 94, lawmakers were limited to three two-year terms in the House and two four-year terms in the Senate under Amendment 73 approved by voters in 1992. The two-year term in the Senate served because of legislative redistricting didn't count against that limit. Amendment 73 was initiated by the people rather than proposed by the Legislature.

Thomas Steele, chairman of the Arkansas Term Limits committee, told the Senate committee that "our organization has sponsored an initiative petition, counting this year, three election cycles in a row and the popular name of our amendment has been the Arkansas Term Limits Amendment.

"I would like to point out that there seems to be a little bit of a conflict with SJR15, which wants to use the same popular name, the Arkansas Term Limits Amendment. I don't know [how] that gets resolved. We've already filed ours. We have been using that popular name for about six years," Steele said.

"I think it is possible that some people might feel like this is an attempt to perhaps piggyback on any goodwill that our amendments have created over the last two years, perhaps may even confuse voters about what exactly ... this bill is, since we have been campaigning for six years on the Arkansas Term Limits Amendment," he said. "This looks like it might be an attempt to lead people to believe that this is the same one when, of course, it is not."

Steele suggested that lawmakers change the popular title in SJR15 so it is not the same as his group's proposal.

"I didn't have anything to do with the actual text of the title, of the subtitle or of the amendment," Clark said. "I went to [the Bureau of Legislative Research] and said, 'Write it,' so it is what it is." The Bureau of Legislative Research works for lawmakers.

"It is no intentional desire of mine to have them confused because the amendment that was offered by Arkansas Term Limits, I thought, was awful," Clark said.

Limiting lawmakers to only 10 years would "make the people's branch weaker than it already is and to try to get anything done to reform government, which is the main thing I have worked on the six years I have been here, more than concerns me," he said.

SundayMonday on 03/24/2019

Print Headline: Plan on term limits to get Senate look; measure proposes 12-year restriction

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

You must be signed in to post comments

Comments

  • Knuckleball1
    March 24, 2019 at 11:03 a.m.

    The Crooks and Thieves want as many years as they can get...

  • Skeptic1
    March 24, 2019 at 12:54 p.m.

    Term limits are in just about every town, village, and governorship in the country. The framers never intended elected office to be a career, they expected people to bring their skills to office do their public service then go back home, that is why Congress is only two terms. Focusing on the job as opposed to getting reelected just might be a win-win.

  • UoABarefootPhdFICYMCA
    March 24, 2019 at 4:55 p.m.

    Should be limited to eight years in eight years out, that includes NO lobbying, zero special interest fundraising or "Collaborating".
    The LEDGE knows they are on thin ice with as little as they do/accomplish.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT