Today's Paper Search Latest App In the news Traffic #Gazette200 Listen Digital FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles/Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT

Economists, reports Politico, are fleeing the Agriculture Department's Economic Research Service. Six of them resigned on a single day last month. The reason? They are feeling persecuted for publishing reports that shed an unflattering light on Donald Trump's policies.

But these reports are just reflecting reality (which has a well-known anti-Trump bias). Rural America is a key part of Donald Trump's base. In fact, rural areas are the only parts of the country in which Trump has a net positive approval rating. But they're also the biggest losers under his policies.

What, after all, is Trumpism? In 2016 Trump pretended to be a different kind of Republican, but in practice almost all of his economic agenda has been GOP standard: big tax cuts for corporations and the rich while hacking away at the social safety net. The one big break from orthodoxy has been his protectionism, his eagerness to start trade wars.

All of these policies disproportionately hurt farm country.

The Trump tax cut largely passes farmers by because they aren't corporations and few of them are rich. One of the studies by Agriculture Department economists that raised Trumpian ire showed that to the extent that farmers saw tax reductions, most of the benefits went to the richest 10 percent, while poor farmers saw a slight tax increase.

At the same time, the assault on the safety net is especially harmful to rural America, which relies heavily on safety-net programs. Of the 100 counties with the highest percentage of their populations receiving food stamps, 85 are rural, and most of the rest are in small metropolitan areas. The expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, which Trump keeps trying to kill, had its biggest positive impact on rural areas.

These programs are crucial to rural Americans even if they don't personally receive government aid. Safety-net programs bring purchasing power, which helps create rural jobs. Medicaid is also a key factor keeping rural hospitals alive; without it, access to health care would be severely curtailed for rural Americans in general.

What about protectionism? The U.S. farm sector is hugely dependent on access to world markets, much more so than the economy as a whole. American soybean growers export half of what they produce; wheat farmers export 46 percent of their crop. China in particular has become a key market for U.S. farm products. That's why Trump's recent rage-tweeting over trade, which raised the prospect of an expanded trade war, sent grain markets to a 42-year low.

It's important to realize that the threat to farmers isn't just about possible foreign retaliation to Trump's tariffs. One fundamental principle in international economics is that in the long run, taxes on imports end up being taxes on exports as well, usually because they lead to a higher dollar. If the world descends into trade war, U.S. imports and exports will both shrink--and farmers, among our most important exporters, will be the biggest losers.

Why then do rural areas support Trump? A lot of it has to do with cultural factors. In particular, rural voters are far more hostile to immigrants than urban voters--especially in communities where there are few immigrants to be found. Lack of familiarity apparently breeds contempt.

Rural voters also feel disrespected by coastal elites, and Trump has managed to channel their anger. No doubt many rural voters, if they happened to read this column, would react with rage, not at Trump, but at me: "So you think we're stupid!"

But support for Trump might nonetheless start to crack if rural voters realized how much they are being hurt by his policies. What's a Trumpist to do?

One answer is to repeat zombie lies. A few weeks ago Trump told a cheering rally that his cuts in the estate tax have helped farmers. This claim is totally false; PolitiFact rated it "pants on fire." The reality is that in 2017 only about 80 farms and closely held businesses--that's right, 80--paid any estate tax at all. Tales of family farms broken up to pay estate tax are pure fiction.

Another answer is to try to suppress the truth. Hence the persecution of Agriculture Department economists who were just trying to do their jobs.

The assault on truth will have consequences that go beyond politics. Agriculture's Economic Research Service isn't supposed to be a cheering section for whoever is in power. As its mission statement says, its role is to conduct "high-quality, objective economic research to inform and enhance public and private decision making." And that's not an idle boast: Along with the Federal Reserve, the research service is a prime example of how good economics can serve clear practical purposes.

Now, however, the service's ability to do its job is being rapidly degraded, because the Trump administration doesn't believe in fact-based policy. Basically, it doesn't believe in facts, period. Everything is political.

And who will pay the price for this degradation? Rural Americans. Trump's biggest supporters are his biggest victims.

------------v------------

Paul Krugman, who won the 2008 Nobel Prize in economics, writes for the New York Times.

Editorial on 05/11/2019

Print Headline: Trump and rural America

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • joebub61yahoocom
    May 11, 2019 at 7:16 a.m.

    Paul Krugman should not be allowed the phrase assault on the truth. For it pretty much details his career.

  • GeneralMac
    May 11, 2019 at 9:47 a.m.

    Paul Krugman evidently has never lived in rural US farm country and is clueless.

    Yes, a Democrat like Collin Peterson( D-MN) would do well in a Presidential race with voters in "farm country USA.

    Pro-life....long time Blue Dog Democrat .

    But the current crop of Democrats ( going back to Barack HUSSEIN Obama) never will do well in "farm country USA"

    When Democrat candidates favor abortion up until birth, transvestites in the military, a pro-palestine position, open borders, sanctuary cities ......they are NOT going to get the vote in "farm country USA"

    I lived in true "farm country USA" my 1st 67 years and owned and operated farms for over 40 years.

    and YOUR experience, Paul Krugman ?

    Deny that "social issues" make any difference with rural voters and I'll sell you oceanfront property in Harrison Arkansas.

  • BoudinMan
    May 11, 2019 at 9:59 a.m.

    Krugman proves that the truth can be painful.

  • GeneralMac
    May 11, 2019 at 10:12 a.m.

    BRUMMETT......Krugman has "proved" nothing.

    He hasn't even shown a poll that shows Democrat presidential candidates are leading Trump in " farm country USA "

  • Seitan
    May 11, 2019 at 10:41 a.m.

    Trump's trade war is bankrupting farmers all over the country. Soybean farmers have been hit especially hard. Trump needs to stop lying, and Congress needs to reign in his ego.

  • JakeTidmore
    May 11, 2019 at 10:51 a.m.

    Since the "wrong" conservatives once again cannot prove they're right and that Krugman is wrong, their counter points remain nothing more than insults and misdirection. This level of debate on their part is not merely sophomoric, it is a lower standard than any kindergarten playground tiff. And like such childish fussing, it quickly bores and has no bearing on the adult world.

    When you "wrong" conservatives quit dumping your garbage and sewage on the page, i.e. verbal attacks & insults, then maybe we can have an honest discussion on topics. Krugman makes valid points and nary a one of you has taken the time to counter them with facts.
    -
    GM - you're not an expert on farm country beliefs either so don't blow your whistle and think that it proves anything. You basically are pasting your own views on that portion of society and have shown us nothing to back such a claim. And, Krugman doesn't make the point that this is about beliefs but that it is about economics. And, the old adage, "It's the economy, stupid", seems to apply here.
    -
    JB - Insulting Krugman is an assault on truth. Don't make a career of it yourself.
    -
    GM - Here's a report showing Trump's farm support "eroding" and there is no mention of things you listed (and which you have failed to provide data for):
    htt ps://ww w.prnewswire.c om/news-releases/trumps-support-in-farm-country-remains-strong-but-eroding-300620497.html
    Care to explain why Trump's disapproval rate is at 46% in farm country?? Or that only 45% say they would support Trump's reelection.
    -
    Finally, from NY Times article out in January "Farm Country Stood by Trump. But the Shutdown Is Pushing It to Breaking Point" comes this telling point:
    While many rural conservatives may loathe the idea of Big Government, farmers and the federal government are welded together by dozens of programs and billions of dollars in spending.
    Now, farmers and farm groups say that federal crop payments have stopped flowing. Farmers cannot get federally backed operating loans to buy seed for their spring planting, or feed for their livestock. They cannot look up new government data about beef prices or soybean yields to make decisions about planting and selling their goods in an ever-changing global market.

  • JakeTidmore
    May 11, 2019 at 10:57 a.m.

    “It is better to offer no excuse than a bad one.”
    ― George Washington
    **
    Am outta here. Got to celebrate our grandson's 1st birthday, get ready for company next week, prepare for a family reunion next weekend, work on memoir documents, and watch some good Agatha Christie mystery movies - which have more truth in them than I find in these comment sections.
    -
    If you say anything in my direction, you're talking to the hand because I ain't here any more. The period at the end of this sentence is the last connection I'll make with this page.

  • WhododueDiligence
    May 11, 2019 at 11:12 a.m.

    Boudinman, yes, with help from fact-hating Trumpists, Krugman shows that truth can be painful, especially for fact-hating Trumpists. But I re-repeat myself since it has become obvious that a fact-hating Trumpist is a glaring redundancy. And apparently fact-hating Trumpist Gmac thinks "BRUMMETT" is synonymous with yelling "OUCH."

  • JA40
    May 11, 2019 at 11:19 a.m.

    See......republicans cannot handle truth and facts. Why waste your energy on nothing. It's unreal that folks still support the lies, thugs, and disgrace the constitution. Oh, well.....let them waller.

  • GeneralMac
    May 11, 2019 at 11:26 a.m.

    When you see farm implememt dealers going out of business, you will know farmers are really hurting.

    A better indicator than liberal " city slicker" Paul Jrugman's rants or brain dead responses from "usual suspects"

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT