Today's Paper Search Latest Core values 🔴 Impeachment hearing live video App Traffic map In the news Listen #Gazette200 Digital FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles/Games Archive
story.lead_photo.caption Population change in Arkansas, 2010-18

Some Arkansas cities and towns have had some of the biggest population declines in the nation, but few states have seen the growth many of Arkansas' other cities and towns have experienced, according to the latest U.S. Census Bureau population estimates released today.

Since 2010, 73 of Arkansas' cities and towns have shrunk at least 10%, and 92 have placed in the bottom 1,000 of U.S. cities and towns -- out of more than 22,000 -- for population declines.

In that same time frame, Arkansas also has been above average across the U.S. in population growth and housing growth. Arkansas had more cities and towns in the top 1,000 for population increases -- 36 -- than all but eight states.

Arkansas is a starker-than-normal example of what demographers say is a national trend: Rural areas are contracting, while urban areas are expanding. Economists say that's consistent with job growth patterns; companies are hiring more often in cities.

In Arkansas, the change is benefiting typically wealthier and mostly white areas and hurting typically poorer and majority black parts of the Delta, as well as poorer parts of the state's south and west.

What makes the gap between the haves and have-nots starker in Arkansas may be in part a matter of people migrating within the state, said David Sorto, a research associate at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville's Center for Business and Economic Research.

"It's a tale of two Arkansases," he said.

Alison Wright, associate research/extension specialist at the Arkansas Economic Development Institute at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, suggested that the small size of Arkansas' towns may have contributed to their higher percentage declines.

Overall, the state's population trend is "distinct areas where the population is growing but the majority of the state is losing population," Wright said.

That extrapolation from today's data release is consistent with what she expected from the county population estimates released last month.

"The fact that almost two-thirds of our counties have lost population since 2010 would appear to explain that the cities in those counties are also losing population," Wright said.

Finding a town in the Delta that bucks the trend of population decline -- one that isn't a suburb or a bedroom community of Jonesboro -- is difficult.

With an estimated 2018 population of 248, Gilmore is larger than it was in the 2010 census count, when it was 188 people, although census estimates from the same year show a population of 265. By either measure, the town is smaller than it was in previous decades and the city by new Interstate 555 lies just north of several towns that are losing population.

Officials with the town did not return a voice mail or an email Wednesday.

Officials with the Delta Regional Authority could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

Pine Bluff and Little Rock are exceptions to the trend of large cities that are seeing growth. Pine Bluff's population dropped by thousands during the past decade, from 49,083 counted in 2010 to 42,271 estimated in 2018.

Little Rock's decline is much smaller, dropping in the past two census estimates by only 537 people since 2016. The city -- still more than double the size of the state's second-biggest city (Fort Smith, at 87,845) -- is estimated at 197,881 people. That's still higher than in 2010, when the Census Bureau counted 193,524 people.

In April, when Pulaski County population estimates showed the county's growth was dependent on births because of a net loss in migration, a spokesman for Little Rock said Mayor Frank Scott Jr. plans to push policies, economic development and public-safety measures to attract millennials and others to the city.

"Jobs growth and other economic indicators have been stagnant for sometime in Little Rock, and that's why voters elected Mayor Scott, to grow our economy and make Little Rock a place people want to work, live and play," spokesman Stephanie Jackson said in an email in April. "Public Safety and jobs growth are two of his top priorities to accomplish that goal."

Still, Little Rock and other metropolitan areas in the states have unemployment levels below the national average, Sorto said.

That's provided an opportunity for Arkansans to find jobs and remain in the state, even if they can't stay in their original, smaller towns.

The places that are growing have economic opportunities surrounding major institutions, including institutions that can supply labor, such as universities, Sorto said. He noted the major research universities in the faster-growing metropolitan areas -- the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas State University at Jonesboro and colleges and universities in central Arkansas.

Cities that have major universities, state government operations, military bases, ports or "quality infrastructure" or are within close proximity to major economic areas can thrive, he said.

Census data released today also include housing unit estimates, which can be an indicator of population and economic growth.

Since 2010, the number of housing units in Arkansas has grown by 4.7%, from 1,316,299 to 1,380,504. It grew by 0.8% from 2017 to 2018, from 1,370,000 housing units. Nationally, housing units have grown by 4.9% since 2010 and by 0.9% since 2017.

While Arkansas is just below the national averages, which are estimates, it's in the middle of the pack among states in housing growth since 2010, 25th out of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. That's higher than neighboring states Oklahoma, Missouri and Mississippi.

A Section on 05/23/2019

Print Headline: Rural-urban shift continuing, latest census data show


Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • RBear
    May 23, 2019 at 7:23 a.m.

    More evidence of the changing demographics and trends across the country. This is why the EC needs to change or at least the way states allocate EC votes should change. This will continue and, as more people move to urban centers, they typically increase the moderate or progressive vote of those areas. They are often more educated, have higher earning potential, and embrace diversity as they are exposed to it.
    Face it, right wingers. The world is changing and most of you are being left behind. You just don't realize it like frogs on a slow boil.

  • RBear
    May 23, 2019 at 8:11 a.m.

    New data came out across the nation and Texas urban centers continue to grow with San Antonio now #2 in growth in the nation with 1.5 million and Fort Worth #3 in growth with just under 900,000. Austin is #6 in growth at 960K. More and more people are moving to the urban centers across the nation.

  • Waitjustaminute
    May 23, 2019 at 8:50 a.m.

    Leave it to RBear to politicize this article. Urbanization has nothing to do with the electoral college. If people are moving from the Delta to the hills, they are still living and voting in Arkansas. The electoral college may have its flaws, but I don't want to live in a country where presidential elections are determined by New York City, Miami, Chicago, and Los Angeles. No thank you.
    As for "face it, right wingers, the world is changing and most of you are being left behind," it takes a special kind of smugness to believe that liberal or progressive dominance is destiny. Whatever happened to the "coalition of the ascendant?"

  • hah406
    May 23, 2019 at 9:28 a.m.

    WJAM, are you saying that your vote should count for more because you live in Arkansas than one of those cities you mention? Why not one person, one vote?

  • dph815
    May 23, 2019 at 9:35 a.m.

    The eagerness in the arrogant BREAR's words is obvious for the Democrats to take over our country and turn it into a socialist state. If that should happen, we will be well down the road to becoming another Venezuela.
    People that elect socialists have the mindset "what can the government do for me?" They either don't have enough intelligence or simply don't care enough to realize---THE GOVERMENT IS US! They simply want to totally change our country into something it has never been before and totally different from what made us into the great nation we are today.

  • GeneralMac
    May 23, 2019 at 9:42 a.m.

    (6th last paragraph ).....

    People move where the jobs are.
    Those that are able bodied and don't want to leave their hometown that offers no job opportunities should not be given welfare for life $$$$$$$$$ so they can stay in the town where they were born.

  • GeneralMac
    May 23, 2019 at 9:49 a.m.

    HAHA406 asks........."are you sasying"

    My reply would be the founding fathers realized the "tyranny of the majority" when setting up the constitution.

    Also, our country's name is "United STATES"

    Using your flawed logic, shouldn't ALL US Senators run in a national election ?

    Half the senators from the east coast, half the senators from the west coast.

  • hah406
    May 23, 2019 at 9:50 a.m.

    Mac, I agree with you, but there are people that can't scrape up enough money to be able to move. They are that poor. Maybe places like NWA, who need to workers, could recruit from the Delta and pay moving expenses in exchange for like five years minimum work for the company that moves them.

  • GeneralMac
    May 23, 2019 at 9:50 a.m.

    What this article shows could have been summed up in a realtor's favorite phrase......."location,location,location "

  • GeneralMac
    May 23, 2019 at 10:26 a.m.

    Yes,HAHA406.......I find it unthinkable that some companies will spend $$$$$$$$$ to transport ILLEGALS to their town, pay for housing $$$$ until the ILLEGALS can "get on their feet", but do NOT offer the same to poor people who ARE citizens in the United States.

    A friend of mine got tired of working swing shifts at his factory job ( actually his wife was fed up with his schedule ) so he applied at a beef packing plant.

    He was told since he didn't speak Spanish, he would not "fit in" with the crew where an opening was available.

    Last time I checked, Minnesota was still in the United States and NOT a part of Mexico.