Today's Paper Search Latest Core values App Traffic map Listen In the news #Gazette200 Digital FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles/Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Iran's Ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, Gharib Abadi, waits for the start of the IAEA board of governors meeting at the International Center in Vienna, Austria, Thursday, Nov. 7, 2019. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

VIENNA -- Iran alleged Thursday that the U.N. inspector it blocked from a nuclear site last week tested positive for suspected traces of explosive nitrates. The U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, disputed Iran's claim.

The allegation made by Iranian representative Kazem Gharib Abadi came as Iran injected uranium gas into centrifuges at its underground Fordo nuclear complex early Thursday, taking its most significant step away from its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers. It also dominated an International Atomic Energy Agency meeting that included discussions about alleged radioactive material found at an undeclared site in Iran.

These latest steps by Iran put additional pressure on Europe to offer Tehran a way to sell its crude oil abroad despite the U.S. sanctions imposed on the country since President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from the nuclear deal over a year ago.

The Oct. 28 incident with the inspector happened at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility, which includes the majority of the centrifuges now enriching uranium in the country. The entrance of Natanz includes equipment to check for traces of nitrates, Abadi said.

[Video not showing up above? Click here to watch » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acg6CyaI2xg]

"The detector's alarm went off and it was signaling to a specific person," he said. "They have repeated this procedure again and again, and unfortunately, the results were the same all the way for only that specific inspector."

As they waited for a female employee to search the inspector, the woman went into the restroom. Abadi alleged when she came back, she no longer tested positive. He said the team took samples from the restroom and seized her handbag.

Abadi said he hoped further tests by Iran and the atomic agency would explain what happened. Iran's nuclear industry has been targeted by sabotage and its scientists assassinated in the past.

This marks the first known instance of Iran blocking an inspector amid the tensions.

The International Atomic Energy Agency offered a rare statement to journalists disputing Abadi's account.

"The agency does not go into details in public about such matters, but based on the information available to us, the agency does not agree with Iran's characterization of the situation involving the inspector, who was carrying out official safeguards duties in Iran," the agency said.

Nitrates are a common fertilizer. However, when mixed with proper amounts of fuel, the material can become an explosive as powerful as TNT. Swab tests, common at airports and other secure facilities, can detect its presence on the skin or objects.

The atomic agency meeting also included discussions about an undeclared site on the outskirts of Tehran that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described to the U.N. in 2018 as a "secret atomic warehouse."

Senior Israeli intelligence officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence gathered there, alleged the site contained undeclared nuclear materials. They claimed there were "several other" similar clandestine nuclear facilities under the purview of Iran's Defense Ministry, not the country's civilian atomic energy agency.

Iran insists its program is for peaceful purposes. However, the International Atomic Energy Agency has said Iran "carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device" in a "structured program" through the end of 2003. The Israeli officials said they believe equipment at the warehouse came from that program.

Jackie Wolcott, the U.S. representative to the watchdog agency, suggested that inspectors recovered possible nuclear material there.

"Iran has refused to provide -- and apparently cannot provide -- a credible, verifiable answer to the fundamental question of where the particles detected by the [International Atomic Energy Agency] came from, and where the material and equipment they came from is today," she said.

Iran has denied the claims by Israel, which has its own undeclared nuclear weapons program.

Meanwhile, Iran began to inject gas into centrifuges after midnight at Fordo, a facility built under a mountain north of the Shiite holy city of Qom, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said. Fordo's 1,044 centrifuges previously spun without uranium gas for enrichment under the nuclear deal, which saw Iran limit its uranium enrichment in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.

The 2015 nuclear deal with world powers had called for Fordo to become "a nuclear, physics and technology center." Now, it's become an active nuclear site again and represents the most-serious step away from the deal it has taken amid the tensions.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo criticized Iran's decision to inject gas into the Fordo centrifuges. In a statement, he made no reference to Trump's decision to leave the deal in May 2018, which sparked the crisis.

"Iran's expansion of proliferation-sensitive activities raises concerns that Iran is positioning itself to have the option of a rapid nuclear breakout," Pompeo said. "It is now time for all nations to reject this regime's nuclear extortion and take serious steps to increase pressure."

Pompeo did not elaborate on what those serious steps should be. The U.S. earlier this week imposed sanctions on members of the inner circle of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Information for this article was contributed by Matthew Lee, Ilan Ben Zion and David Rising of The Associated Press.

A Section on 11/08/2019

Print Headline: Iran suspicious of nuke inspectors

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

COMMENTS - It looks like you're using Internet Explorer, which isn't compatible with the Democrat-Gazette commenting system. You can join the discussion by using another browser, like Firefox or Google Chrome.
It looks like you're using Microsoft Edge. The Democrat-Gazette commenting system is more compatible with Firefox and Google Chrome.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT