OPINION - Editorial

OTHERS SAY Back teachers, not strikes

What job can be more important than the one that stewards children from preschool to senior year? Yet with a potential teachers strike approaching, words of appreciation for teachers are being replaced by clashes over competing contract provisos. It’s Chicago Teachers Union vs. Chicago Public Schools, causing Chicagoans of all types to choose sides, to either talk up the value of teachers or risk sounding like educational curmudgeons.

While it’s easy to view contentious negotiations solely through the prism of bargaining chips and bottom lines, that would be a mistake. It’s possible to celebrate teachers—their diligence, their devotion—and still oppose a strike.

On these pages we have argued numerous times about the harm that a strike would cause—to students, to parents, to the city of Chicago. And we have laid out a strong case for why teachers should accept the generous contract proposal Mayor Lori Lightfoot is offering.

Negotiations between unions and government are by nature adversarial. The rhetoric gets heated, leverage gets applied, tempers flare. But that doesn’t mean that the value of teachers should be obscured by the rancor.

No one involved in this process should forget the spark that teachers supply to children’s development. Last Saturday, Lightfoot said the city and CPS remain committed “to getting a deal done that reflects our fundamental respect for teachers.”

That fundamental respect for teachers is deserved, regardless of the state of contract negotiations. Yes, Chicagoans, you can back teachers and oppose a strike.

Upcoming Events