Today's Paper Search Latest App In the news Traffic #Gazette200 Paper Trails Listen Digital FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles/Games Archive
story.lead_photo.caption Brenda Looper

Yet another mass shooting in Texas happened over the weekend, with seven people, not counting the gunman, dead. That makes, according to the online nonprofit Rivard Report, 192 Texas mass-shooting deaths since the 1966 Texas Tower shooting. Four of the 10 deadliest mass shootings in modern U.S. history took place in Texas, including two in the past two years: Sutherland Springs (26 killed) and El Paso (22 killed). Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives data show that Texas has the most guns; it also has weak gun laws that became even weaker on Sunday.

But ... thoughts and prayers, right?

I grew up around guns and did my fair share of shooting; I knew to respect and be careful with them.

I had one friend who was shot and killed at age 10 when another friend was showing her his dad's rifle, which had been stored loaded. The perfunctory nature of a one-word quote from the coroner in the story about her death still chills me: "Dud."

When I was a teenager, a daughter of a family that my family was close to committed suicide by shooting herself in the stomach, bleeding to death before anyone found her. I was disgusted to hear how the adults were talking about her at church, not caring about the deep depression she must have been in.

Most of us probably have stories like this. Not everyone knows somebody killed in a mass shooting, but many of us know victims of gun violence, accidental or intentional.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is barred from using federal funds for gun-violence research that might advocate gun control. Former Arkansas U.S. Rep. Jay Dickey sponsored the original bill restricting research, but told Huffington Post in 2015, two years before his death, that he regretted it: "I wish we had started the proper research and kept it going all this time. I have regrets. ... If we had somehow gotten the research going, we could have somehow found a solution to the gun violence without there being any restrictions on the Second Amendment."

Because of the law's chilling effect, most gun research is privately funded, much of it with an agenda. RAND Corp. analyzed thousands of gun-policy studies, releasing a report last year that points out just how little we know about the link between firearm laws and gun violence, with only 63 of those studies establishing a causal relationship between specific policies and outcomes. The report stated, "[T]he U.S. government has spent just 1.6 percent as much on gun policy research as it has on research involving causes of similar levels of mortality in the United States, such as traffic accidents or sepsis, meaning that published studies on gun policy are correspondingly rare."

The analysis did show that laws preventing access by children to guns appear to reduce suicides, accidental injuries and deaths in youths. Had such laws been around when I was a kid, neither of those girls I knew might have died.

After every mass shooting, the NRA tells us it's too soon to talk about policy, and anything you want to do will be an infringement of gun rights. Gun-control advocates counter: What better time to talk about restrictions, and what about our right to live? Both sides dig in and nothing gets done because one side is sure the other wants to take all their guns, and that side thinks the other wants to live in the Wild West. Rinse. Repeat.

Public opinion polls on the whole show that the majority of Americans believe our gun laws should be stricter, and that universal background checks and red-flag laws should be implemented.

A Politico/Morning Consult poll conducted after the El Paso and Dayton shootings found that 73 percent of those surveyed (including 54 percent of Republicans) support stricter gun laws, and 91 percent want mandatory background checks. It also found overwhelming majorities want to block sales to people reported to law enforcement as dangerous (89 percent) and people with violent misdemeanors (84 percent).

The poll also found that those surveyed were pretty realistic. Politico reported: "[A]lthough voters support these measures, they aren't optimistic Congress will act ... . Only 39 percent said they think it's very or somewhat likely Congress passes gun control legislation in the next year. A slight majority, 52 percent, said it's either not very likely or not likely at all."

We hear that no law could have prevented a mass shooting, and that the laws already in place aren't being enforced. See ... this is where federally funded gun-violence research would come in handy. What's stopping us from enforcing the current laws and making a few new ones? If they work, good; any death prevented is a positive. If laws don't work, repeal them. No law will stop every crime, but doing nothing gets us nowhere but in another convoy to the cemetery.

Don't forget: I want to know what food always makes you think of home. A lot of things in my childhood revolved around food. Aunt Thelma's chicken and dumplings (made with strips of pie crust, I believe) always disappeared quickly at Fifth Sunday lunches at church. While I make mine with biscuit dough, I still remember her when I cook dumplings.

Let me know your memorable foods at the email address below, or in the comments on the newspaper site or my blog.


Assistant Editor Brenda Looper is editor of the Voices page. Read her blog at Email her at

Editorial on 09/04/2019

Print Headline: BRENDA LOOPER: No more


Sponsor Content

COMMENTS - It looks like you're using Internet Explorer, which isn't compatible with the Democrat-Gazette commenting system. You can join the discussion by using another browser, like Firefox or Google Chrome.
It looks like you're using Microsoft Edge. The Democrat-Gazette commenting system is more compatible with Firefox and Google Chrome.