Fort Smith delays alcohol-tax increase

Bars, restaurants already struggling, Fort Smith board told

FORT SMITH — The Fort Smith Board of Directors voted to hit pause on a tax increase that would affect private clubs throughout the city.

The board voted to adopt the city operating budget for the 2021 fiscal year during its regular meeting Tuesday. It also approved an ordinance amending the 2021 operating budget to accommodate recommended new needs requests made by city departments.

Also on the agenda was a proposed ordinance increasing an existing city “supplemental alcohol tax” from 5% to 10%. However, despite this increase being estimated to generate about $500,000 each year for the city’s general fund, the board decided to adopt the ordinance after approving an amendment to it that it not go into effect until Dec. 1, 2021.

City Administrator Carl Geffken explained that the tax applies to customers who order alcoholic beverages at bars and restaurants in Fort Smith.

In a memo to Geffken, City Finance Director Andrew Richards wrote that 10% is the maximum fee allowed for such a tax by Arkansas state law. City Clerk Sherri Gard said on Wednesday that the city established the tax at the current 5% rate in 1969.

At the meeting, Talicia Richardson, executive director of 64.6 Downtown, a nonprofit organization that focuses on revitalization projects for downtown Fort Smith, spoke out against increasing the tax with the covid-19 pandemic still ongoing. She said certain small businesses in the community have closed their doors during the pandemic, with others trying to sustain themselves by relying “heavily” on the state with supplemental benefits for their employees to get them through it, as well as commitments from their banks.

Bars and restaurants, Richardson argued, were hit heavily by the pandemic.

“They were without being open for 74 days,” Richardson said. “That’s a long time for a small business. Now they’re operating still at limited capacities. None of the bars within our community or our state are able to operate at 100%, and anyone who has had a business, or knows anyone who’s in business, knows when you’re operating with limited capacity, there is a financial impact.

“You do have to still pay mortgage, you do still have to pay rent, you still have utilities that need to be paid. They’re not based on your capacity. They’re based on your operations.”

Richardson said the operations of bars and restaurants will be continually affected because they are not operating at full capacity. In addition, despite the creation of a covid-19 vaccine, it is still uncertain when the pandemic will end.

“I’m respectfully asking the board of directors tonight to consider postponing your decision until December 2021 to allow these businesses to operate post-covid because we are still in covid,” Richardson said.

After Richardson stated her case, City At-Large Position 6 Director Kevin Settle made a motion to amend the ordinance so that it would go into effect July 1. Ward 3 Director Lavon Morton mentioned that the motion would not preclude the Board of Directors from further extending the effective date if the pandemic did not sufficiently improve before July 1.

At-Large Position 7 Director Neal Martin voiced his own opposition to the tax increase even with such a delay. He noted that the board had approved the city’s operating budget for 2020 at Tuesday’s meeting, which at that point showed an estimated surplus of more than $4.7 million across the city’s four operating funds (more than $2.5 million of which being in the general fund), and said he thought the city was “doing well financially.”

“Is a half million dollars really that big of a deal for us?” Martin asked. “I don’t know, I think we could probably continue to live within our means and not impact our bars, our restaurants and our citizens by offering up another tax. Just because we’ve got the ability to raise a tax doesn’t mean we have to.”

Ultimately, Settle’s motion was defeated, with three directors voting for it and four voting against it. Ward 2 Director Andre’ Good then made the motion to amend the ordinance with an effective date of Dec. 1, 2021, which passed with five positive votes and two negative votes. The latter votes were made by Martin and Ward 4 Director George Catsavis. The amended ordinance was passed afterward with the same results.

With the new needs requests that were approved as a result of the ordinance amending the 2021 operating budget on Tuesday, the city is left with a total projected deficit of more than $3.1 million across four operating funds, with more than $1.2 million being in the general fund, according to the amendment. However, this does not take other changes the Board of Directors approved, such as establishing the effective date for the tax increase, into account.

Upcoming Events