Today's Paper Search Latest Elections Core values App Traffic Listen Story ideas iPad FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive

Most of the media focus after a presidential primary naturally falls on who won, who did better than expected, who quit, and whose candle is dangerously close to flickering out. But the most significant takeaway from Tuesday's Democratic primary in New Hampshire is how much disarray the Democratic Party finds itself in.

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders' win is most notable for how little of the vote he actually received--only one in four primary voters backed him in a crowded field. Looking broadly at the results, more voters backed moderate candidates than they did progressives. So while the leader of the left wing of the party persevered by a hair, the voters overall aligned with the moderate bloc.

If you lump together the vote totals for Sanders, Elizabeth Warren (whose dismal performance seems ominous) and billionaire progressive activist Tom Steyer, they won 38.6 percent of the vote. But the moderates did even better.

If Sanders is emerging as the front-runner for his party's nomination, he is doing so without the support of most of the party voters. That spells trouble. And it's notable that while Sanders has won more votes than any other contender, Buttigieg leads in the delegate count by one.

It's early. More clarity may come after the next few weeks of primaries and caucuses, especially the 16 held on March 3--so-called Super Tuesday, which will account for one-third of total delegates--and after billionaire Mike Bloomberg starts appearing in debates and showing up on ballots.

The question then is whether Bloomberg's outrageous levels of spending on advertising will buy the hearts of the moderates at the expense of Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar. And maybe even peel off reluctant Sanders supporters who are most concerned about beating President Trump in the fall and worry that Sanders is too radical to win a national general election.

But with five candidates still polling in double digits nationally, there's a strong chance that the race for delegates could run its course without a conclusion--with none of the candidates amassing the 1,991 delegates necessary to win the nomination on the first ballot of the Democratic National Convention. So there's little incentive for anyone who's still raising money and collecting delegates to drop out anytime soon.

Under current party rules, the estimated 771 so-called super-delegates--mostly national and state-level party leaders whose votes are not tied to their state primary results--don't have a vote in the first round of balloting, a change made after Sanders' supporters claimed that super-delegates lined up early behind Hillary Clinton in 2016 and tipped the nomination in her favor.

But the super-delegates do get to vote in the second ballot, and if it's true that the party leadership consists mostly of moderates, that doesn't bode well for Sanders (or Warren, if her campaign recovers) if they fail to win a majority of the regular delegates. It's likely that the super-delegates would align behind the top surviving moderate--maybe Bloomberg at that point--which could lead to an internal bloodbath between the progressives and moderates.

Meanwhile, Trump rolls along trolling the Dems, holding rallies and raising money, seemingly impervious politically to fallout from his various scandals.

Editorial on 02/14/2020

Print Headline: Moderates won the night


Sponsor Content

COMMENTS - It looks like you're using Internet Explorer, which isn't compatible with the Democrat-Gazette commenting system. You can join the discussion by using another browser, like Firefox or Google Chrome.
It looks like you're using Microsoft Edge. The Democrat-Gazette commenting system is more compatible with Firefox and Google Chrome.