OPINION

COLUMNIST: Slavery not everything we're about

The New York Times last year came up with a project to debase America, to say this country is about nothing but slavery, that the institution has determined everything we are, that it instructs us to this day on the maltreatment of Black people. The Revolutionary War was fought to keep it going and the pretenses of liberty and equality have been just that, pretenses. Slavery even fashioned a capitalism that maintains its evils and built our economy, we learn.

The essays are set to continue even though the project has already won a Pulitzer Prize, bringing to mind the occasion in 1932 when the Times won a Pulitzer for stories written about the Soviet Union that emphasized its supposed economic achievements without noting its famines.

The really scary thing is that the Times has so arranged things that a book of the project's contents will be taught in public high schools. That will help to further dislodge future generations from any understanding of how our values fought slavery instead of bowing to it, that many have understood that slavery and Jim Crow are our vilest faults without saying we have no virtues.

Right now, this leftist thesis of slavery is much of what is behind a demand for dramatic change of just about everything, not least capitalism that has been one of the foremost blessings in human history.

All of this happens to be surrounding us at a time when Black Lives Matter is understandably protesting a tragic, evil killing of a Black man by a policeman while also setting fire to police stations, a church, an apartment complex under construction and injuring police. Oh, this is nothing, say some of the intelligentsia even if others have not yet given up on thought, such as a number of this nation's top historians who have said the 1619 project is factually asunder.

One happens to be Gordon Wood who just maybe knows as much about the American Revolution as anyone and who says there is not a single quote anywhere to be found of a colonist saying the war could save slavery. The most enthusiasm for the war was in New England, which had already pretty much exiled slavery, he says, and the South had no reason to believe independence would secure the institution. Most of the Founders were against slavery, believing it would not last very long, but the invention of the cotton gin changed things. It is true that cotton sales contributed to the economy but absurd to say they built the economy.

Still, we can all maybe right now join hands on improved race relationships if we remember another point endorsed by such Black thinkers as Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, Jason Riley and the successful activist Bob Woodson, who is quoted as putting it this way: "Nothing is more lethal than to convey to people that they have an exemption from personal responsibility."

Columnist

Upcoming Events