WASHINGTON -- States can't cut religious schools out of programs that send public money to private education, a divided Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.
By a 5-4 vote with the conservatives in the majority, the justices upheld a Montana scholarship program that allows state tax credits for private schooling in which almost all of the recipients attend religious schools.
The Montana Supreme Court had struck down the K-12 private education scholarship program that was created by the Legislature in 2015 to make donors eligible for up to $150 in state tax credits. The state court had ruled that the tax credit violated the Montana Constitution's ban on state aid to religious schools.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion that said the state ruling itself ran afoul of the religious freedom, embodied in the U.S. Constitution, of parents who want the scholarships to help pay for their children's private education. "A state need not subsidize private education. But once a state decides to do so, it cannot disqualify some private schools solely because they are religious," Roberts wrote.
[Video not showing up above? Click here to watch » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0tPRLW2Kwg]
In a dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor described the ruling as "perverse."
"Without any need or power to do so, the Court appears to require a State to reinstate a tax-credit program that the Constitution did not demand in the first place," she said.
Parents whose children attend religious schools sued to preserve the program. The high court decision upholds families' rights "to exercise our religion as we see fit," said Kendra Espinoza, the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit whose two daughters attend Stillwater Christian School in Kalispell, Mont., near Glacier National Park.
Roughly three-dozen states have similar no-aid provisions in their constitutions. Courts in some states have relied on those provisions to strike down religious-school funding.
Arkansas' Succeed Scholarship program provides state funding for children with special education needs to attend qualified private schools. Those include schools affiliated with religious organizations.
Two states with existing private education programs, Maine and Vermont, could see quick efforts to force them to allow religious schools to participate.
Attorney General William Barr praised the ruling as "an important victory for religious liberty and religious equality in the United States." The Trump administration supported the parents' Supreme Court appeal.
Arkansas Lt. Gov. Tim Griffin applauded the high court's decision in a statement Tuesday.
"The United States Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue marks an important win for children, their parents, and the communities where they live. The Court correctly ruled that a State cannot bar private schools from school choice programs simply because they are religious," Griffin said. "Equipped with this ruling, I look forward to working with the Arkansas Legislature and the governor to take bold action and further expand educational freedom for parents and children in the 2021 session."
Advocates for allowing state money to be used in private schooling said the court recognized in its decision that parents should not be penalized for sending their children to schools that are a better fit than the public schools.
"This opinion will pave the way for more states to pass school choice programs that allow parents to choose a school that best meets their child's individual needs, regardless of whether those schools are religious or nonreligious," said Erica Smith, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice, which represented the parents in their court fight.
But the president of the Montana Federation of Public Employees, which counts more than 12,000 teachers and other school workers as union members, called the decision "a slap in the face" to its members and the communities they serve.
"Today's decision violates Montana's commitment to public education, our children, and our constitution. Extremist special interests are manipulating our tax code to rob Montana children of quality education while padding the pockets of those who run exclusive, discriminatory private schools," union president Amanda Curtis said.
In a separate concurring opinion, Justice Samuel Alito pointed to evidence of anti-Catholic bigotry that he said motivated the original adoption of the Montana provision and others like it in the 1800s, although Montana's constitution was redone in 1972 with the provision intact.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, whose two daughters attend Catholic schools, made a similar point during arguments in January when he talked about the "grotesque religious bigotry" against Catholics that underlay the amendment.
Information for this article was contributed by staff members of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.
