WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans are compiling a package of policing changes after George Floyd’s death that would create a national database of use-of-force incidents, encourage police body cameras and include an effort to make lynching a federal hate crime.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, whose home state of Kentucky faces unrest over the police shooting of Breonna Taylor, indicated Thursday that the legislation would be ready soon.
“The killing of black Americans like George Floyd and Breonna Taylor have accelerated important conversations,” McConnell said as he opened the Senate.
“This is an issue whose time has come,” Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., a black senator, said Thursday on the Today show.
A group of GOP senators led by Scott is meeting behind in private and with the White House on the legislation. Despite a push to produce a package this week, the deadline is slipping as details are being compiled. It is expected to be released early next week, according to a senior GOP aide unauthorized to discuss the situation and granted anonymity.
Central to the package will be a new national database of use-of-force incidents, similar to one included in a Democratic bill. It’s a concept both parties support as a way to track potential police misconduct and ensure officers cannot simply transfer from one department to another without public disclosure of their records.
Scott said the provision would be named the “Breonna Taylor Reporting Act” and it would include not only the tracking of use-of-force incidents but also no-knock warrants such as police used to enter the woman’s home. The database proposal expands on a similar bill Scott introduced in 2015 after Walter Scott — no relation — was killed by police in South Carolina.
Unlike the House Democratic bill, which would ban police chokeholds, the Republican bill appears to be more focused on providing training for officers to deescalate confrontations.
It would also include “duty to intervene” provisions so other officers would step up to stop misconduct, Scott said.
“We’re trying to provide the resources necessary to retrain these local departments,” he said.
One area of uncertainty is over so-called qualified immunity, which the Democrats’ bill adjusts to make it easier for injured individuals to claim damages in civil suits against police offices. The White House has said it was a nonstarter, and it is not likely to be included in the Senate bill.
Agreement, though, is quickly forming around the anti-lynching bill, an effort that has previously been approved by both the House and Senate but was being held up last week by objections from a lone Republican, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who wants more specific language in the bill.
Paul has pushed for other measures, including changes to no-knock warrants and an end to the practice of sending surplus military equipment to police departments. Both are included in the Democrats’ bill.
Democrats have so far panned the GOP effort as insufficient compared with their own far-reaching proposal, built from decades of work by the Congressional Black Caucus tracking police and racial issues. The House is expected to approve the Democrats’ bill in mid-June.
“The moment does not call for cherry-picking one or two things to do. It calls for bold and broad-scale change,” said Senate Democratic leader Charles Schumer of New York.
Schumer has compared this moment in the aftermath of Floyd’s death with the GOP approach to gun violence legislation after mass shootings, when lawmakers try to find consensus but end up doing nothing.
“We cannot go through those same motions again,” he said. “This is about the original sin of America, that we must try to deal with head-on.”
In the House, GOP leader Kevin McCarthy of California signaled a willingness to engage on the issue.
“I think there’s a lot of concepts that we agree upon,” Mc-Carthy told reporters.
McCarthy said he favored a ban on chokeholds.
McConnell said the Senate is “preparing to add to the conversations surrounding law enforcement with our own serious proposal.” He said the policies would “take smart steps without attacking the vast majority of police officers who bravely do their jobs the right way.”