Today's Paper Latest Coronavirus ­čö┤Children in Peril Quarantine Families Core values App Listen Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive

UNITED NATIONS -- Cruise missiles that slammed into a Saudi oil complex last year probably came from Iran, the United Nations concluded, lending support to U.S. allegations that Tehran was behind a series of attacks that sent tremors through global energy markets and shook the kingdom.

While the U.N. didn't go as far as accusing Iran of carrying out the attacks, it found that the weapons used in a series of blasts last year were of "Iranian origin," according to a report Secretary-General Antonio Guterres sent Thursday to the Security Council that was seen by Bloomberg. Guterres also pointed out that "these items may have been transferred in a manner inconsistent with" U.N. resolutions.

Missiles and a swarm of drones set off fires at the crude processing plant in Afif in May 2019, causing extensive damage and causing a spike in global oil prices. Houthi rebels in Yemen, who have been battling a Saudi-led coalition in that country's civil war, claimed responsibility. But once the planning and military sophistication that went into the assault became apparent, suspicion quickly shifted to the Iranians, who have been supporting the Houthis.

Investigators analyzed the debris of the cruise missiles and drones in that attack, strikes on the Abha International Airport in southwestern Saudi Arabia that June and August and in Abqaiq and Khurays that September. U.N. investigators also compared their findings to weapons seized by the U.S. off the coast of Yemen in late 2019 and early 2020.

The investigators concluded that the cruise missiles and the delta-wing drones deployed in the attacks were of Iranian origin. The U.N. added that some items in the two U.S. weapons seizures "were identical or similar" to those found in the debris of the cruise missiles and drones used in the attacks on Saudi Arabia last year.

The engines on the aircraft showed similarities to an Iranian engine designated as Shahed 783, presented by Iran in a military exhibition in May 2014, the U.N. found.

The findings may help the Trump administration dial up pressure on Iran as it seeks to renew a U.N. arms embargo on Tehran that's set to expire this year as part of the 2015 nuclear deal, from which President Donald Trump has withdrawn the U.S.

Russia and China have already said they won't support extending the embargo. Officials including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo are warning that the U.S. could reimpose all U.N. sanctions against Tehran if the embargo were allowed to expire.

The U.N. Security Council will meet later this month to discuss the secretary-general's report, which is sent to the council twice a year as part of the 2015 nuclear accord.

At the time, the attacks raised questions about Saudi Arabia's role as an anchor of stability in global energy markets and exposed glaring vulnerabilities in its defense capabilities despite having spent hundreds of billions of dollars on weaponry.

Iran's and Saudi Arabia's struggle for dominance in the Persian Gulf and beyond has often drawn in the U.S. Trump has cultivated closer relations with the Saudi rulers while imposing harsher sanctions on Iran.

Tensions flared most recently in January after the U.S. killed a top Iranian general, Qassem Soleimani, who ran the elite Quds Force and oversaw the Islamic Republic's ties to armed groups across the Middle East. The U.S. State Department had declared Soleimani a terrorist.

Earlier this week, Iran sentenced a man to death on charges of providing the CIA and Israel's Mossad intelligence service with information that led to the killing of Soleimani in a drone strike in Baghdad, according to the country's judiciary.

Information for this article was contributed by Arsalan Shahla of The Associated Press.


Sponsor Content

COMMENTS - It looks like you're using Internet Explorer, which isn't compatible with the Democrat-Gazette commenting system. You can join the discussion by using another browser, like Firefox or Google Chrome.
It looks like you're using Microsoft Edge. The Democrat-Gazette commenting system is more compatible with Firefox and Google Chrome.