Today's Paper Search Latest Coronavirus Families Core values App Listen Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive

A proposed rule that some say would lead to an unheard-of number of transfers in college basketball and football will not be implemented for the upcoming 2020-21 school year.

Instead, it's possible -- maybe even likely -- players will be allowed to transfer without sitting out a season's worth of games as early as the 2021-22 academic year.

The NCAA this week in a news release announced that its Division I Council has "approved a resolution that outlined its intention to adopt by January a comprehensive legislative package creating uniform, modernized rules governing eligibility after transfer for student-athletes in all sports."

On the horizon is new legislation that could allow athletes in football, men's and women's basketball, baseball and men's ice hockey to be able to transfer and not have to sit out a year. Currently, athletes in all sports except those mentioned are able to transfer and play in games at their new schools immediately.

The NCAA does allow graduates (with a year of eligibility remaining) in football and basketball to transfer and not have to sit out a year of competition.

Had a new rule been implemented this week, it's possible chaos would've ensued, with record numbers of basketball and football players electing to seek out new opportunities with the school year quickly approaching. Many players might've elected to transfer to schools closer to family amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic uncertainties.

Under the old rules, 775 players have entered the men's basketball transfer portal this offseason, as reported by Jeff Goodman of "Stadium." That includes 155 graduate transfers.

"I believe it's OK to transfer. It's OK, just sit out a year," Kansas Coach Bill Self said on a recent podcast. "I don't see the big deal about that at all."

He pointed out some possible negatives in allowing players to transfer without having to sit out a season's worth of games.

"Now there's going to be 2,500 to 3,000 kids transferring every year just in our sport, and where do you draw the line? What's the drop-dead date you can transfer? Can you transfer the first day before classes? Can you just leave universities and programs high and dry because somebody else on another team transferred and a scholarship became open?" Self said. "What about APR? If a kid is eligible but does not have a 2.6 [grade-point average] if he transfers ... they've got to adjust that. Now there could be schools not competing in the NCAA Tournament because of this rule."

Schools whose Academic Progress Rate score falls below a certain standard cannot compete in the postseason. Losing players to transfer affects an APR score negatively.

"It's not going to be positive. There are cases it could be positive, but as a whole regarding our sport, I don't think it's good," Self stated of a rule allowing transfers to have immediate eligibility.

Noted Council chair M. Grace Calhoun, the athletic director at Pennsylvania: "The transfer environment has long been an issue of much discussion in Division I. The Division I Council is committed to a uniform and equitable approach to transfer rules that considers student-athlete well-being and the opportunities available after transfer. We will not simply change the rule, but we will consider a comprehensive package designed to address the multiple complexities involved."

The "comprehensive package" will be put together by Nov. 1, so it can be introduced at the NCAA Convention in January, which falls in the 2020-21 legislative cycle. A vote is expected to follow at the conclusion of the convention, meaning those uniform transfer rules could take effect as soon as the 2021-22 season.

Sports on 05/23/2020

Print Headline: College transfer rule stays same for now


Sponsor Content

COMMENTS - It looks like you're using Internet Explorer, which isn't compatible with the Democrat-Gazette commenting system. You can join the discussion by using another browser, like Firefox or Google Chrome.
It looks like you're using Microsoft Edge. The Democrat-Gazette commenting system is more compatible with Firefox and Google Chrome.