Today's Paper Latest After 9/11 Coronavirus iPad Core Values Weather The Article Story ideas Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive

OPINION | BRENDA LOOPER: Nope, not enough

by Brenda Looper | August 25, 2021 at 3:33 a.m.
Brenda Looper

It was about 8:45 Monday morning when an alert from The Washington Post came across my email: "FDA grants full approval to Pfizer- BioNTech coronavirus vaccine, potentially persuading the hesitant to get the shots."

Finally, I thought. Finally we'll see who was using the emergency use authorization (EUA) as a flimsy excuse. Those will be the people shifting goalposts this week.

In a statement, FDA acting commissioner Janet Woodcock said: "As the first FDA-approved covid-19 vaccine, the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product."

For some, we know that won't be enough. If the surge of the more infectious and deadly Delta variant hasn't been enough to convince anti- vaxxers, full FDA approval/licensure won't instantly make them think, "Hey, I really should get vaccinated so that, even if I do get infected, I most likely won't end up on a ventilator or die."

Those rare breakthrough cases (still less than 1 percent of the total cases, and most appear to be due to the Delta variant) are enough to make them dig in even further. Why, they'll just take their chances because the odds of survival are great.

Sure, tell that to the 628,000-plus people who've died in the United States from covid-19, out of 4.4 million-plus worldwide. (U.S. deaths are 14 percent of the total deaths, and 18 percent of total cases, according to Johns Hopkins' numbers.)

But numbers mean nothing to those who are vociferously opposed to getting vaccinated. As the editorial on the opposite page said Tuesday: "But that's reasoning. And it's been said before: You can't reason somebody out of an opinion if he hasn't been reasoned into it. And for some reason the covid-19 vaccine has had opposition that the flu shot never had."

I'd blame the bulk on the politicization of the pandemic (echoed by polls of partisans who refuse to vaccinate). When you have a very vocal minority wanting to "own the libs" (and I guess those of us without political affiliation who believe in listening to actual experts), spreading misinformation and castigating those who've followed pandemic protocols as "living in fear" ... well, you get what's happening in the U.S. now, especially in the South.

Now that Pfizer has full approval, the goalposts are being moved. For those not steeped in the language of debate, logic and persuasive writing, don't worry; I'm not getting ready to suit up for a game ... unless that game is on my iPad.

"Moving the goalposts," according to Logically Fallacious, means "demanding from an opponent that he or she address more and more points after the initial counter-argument has been satisfied, refusing to concede or accept the opponent's argument." Those who've dealt with trolls on comment boards are very familiar with this tactic.

We can expect a good portion of those who have refused to vaccinate on the basis that the vaccine hadn't been given full approval will likely move to the argument that the decision to grant full approval was rushed.

Well, yeah, it was, partly because of the number of people who refused a vaccine with only an EUA despite the fact that we're in the middle of a public-health emergency. As Ben Guarino, Laurie McGinley and Tyler Pager of The Washington Post reported, it was the fastest vaccine approval in the history of the FDA. Critics had demanded the FDA move quickly, they wrote, saying the shots' effectiveness and safety had been amply demonstrated by the millions of vaccinations administered since authorization.

Still, the FDA didn't want to give the impression of a rush job, so it dedicated more staff and resources while still insisting on six months' follow-up data on those enrolled in the clinical trial. So while it was quick (four months after Pfizer applied for licensing), it was based on much more data than the original EUA. And even though it's got full approval, FDA oversight will continue, as it does for all pharmaceuticals.

But yeah, I know, government bad.

No matter what, unless you have a valid medical or religious reason not to be vaccinated, you should take personal responsibility and get the shots as soon as you can so that we can find our way out of this mess. I have my "plague pass," as do many others, but more need to roll up their sleeves, whether they're Medicaid recipients unaware the shots are free, or people who think they're invulnerable.

There will be other goalposts moved in the meantime.

For those people who think there is not enough research: If 18 months' worth of data during a public-health emergency isn't enough, it will be two, or three, or five years they'll want. In that case, if the variants keep getting deadlier, well, they might not be around long enough for "enough" data. Which also takes care of those who say, "I'll wait for herd immunity."

No matter what issue is resolved, these people will always find another reason not to face the needle.

Someone please make sure they stretch first. Moving those goalposts can be strenuous.

Assistant Editor Brenda Looper is editor of the Voices page. Read her blog at Email her at

Print Headline: Nope, not enough


Sponsor Content