Today's Paper Latest Coronavirus The Article Core Values Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive
ADVERTISEMENT

Map murky in Afghanistan on Taliban's holdings

by JON GAMBRELL THE ASSOCIATED PRESS | May 2, 2021 at 3:26 a.m.

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- Trying to map the long war in Afghanistan has become an increasingly challenging task ahead of the planned withdrawal of all U.S. forces.

Since the U.S.-led invasion of 2001 and the subsequent overthrow of Afghanistan's Taliban government, insurgent activity shrank, then began to grow again as the conflict stretched on for two decades. Now, as the withdrawal with a summer completion date looms, even American officials acknowledge being publicly in the dark about the Taliban's strength.

"By many measures, the Taliban are in a stronger military position now than at any point since 2001, though many once-public metrics related to the conduct of the war have been classified or are no longer produced," a March report by the U.S. Congressional Research Service warned.

That included data offered on the roughly 400 districts across Afghanistan's 34 provinces. Control of those districts had been a key metric to judge overall control in the country.

In its last published report to include that level of detail, the U.S. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction said the Afghan government controlled just 54% of those districts as of October 2018, the lowest number recorded since public tracking began in November 2015. Of the remaining districts, the U.S. government described 34% as contested and 12% as being under insurgent control.

In April 2019, the inspector general said the U.S.-commanded NATO Resolute Support mission no longer assessed district-level control, describing the data as offering "limited decision-making value to the commander." But that decision was made during the Trump administration's push for negotiations with the Taliban, suggesting military officials shut down the effort to avoid showing how bad things had become, said Bill Roggio, who has been tracking the war for years.

Roggio, whose Long War Journal now operates in the Washington hawkish think tank called the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, has tracked the conflict for years based on press reports and data he's gathered.

He believes half of the country's districts are now contested between the government and the Taliban, with more than 120 fully government-controlled and more than 70 fully held by the Taliban.

But he acknowledges those numbers represent his best guess. Some districts held by the government swing back and forth depending on Taliban offensives. Others see the government hole up in central headquarters or barracks -- and then "the police commander is getting killed in an IED [improvised explosive device] attack when he pulls out of the base," Roggio said.

"A lot of cases in these districts that I have contested, the government really only controls the district centers," Roggio said. "I think that that map actually should look worse than it really is."

Fawad Aman, a deputy spokesman for the Afghan Defense Ministry, disputed Roggio's figures as "not correct and far from reality." However, he claimed without offering evidence that the Taliban controlled just "more than 10 districts," in Afghanistan in "very remote parts of the country."

Aman's claim is roughly half the lowest estimate of Taliban district control ever offered publicly by the U.S., which was put out in January 2016.

A recent report from the United Nations' humanitarian affairs office reported fighting across the country, with some 90,000 people internally displaced since the start of this year alone. Since 2012, some 4.8 million people have been displaced from their homes and not returned in a country of 38 million.

Even Kabul, the country's heavily guarded capital, isn't safe. The U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan showed the most civilian casualties in 2020 from any province were in in Kabul, with 255 people killed and 562 wounded.

The worst violence was from targeted killings of activists, journalists, judges and lawyers since Washington struck its deal with the Taliban. While the Islamic State group's Afghanistan affiliate has claimed some of the slayings, most aren't acknowledged by any group -- only adding to the growing sense of unease.

Aman also disputed that Kabul is insecure, citing what he described as regular security force patrols, checkpoints and raids.

"The Taliban presence around the capital, Kabul, is less than any time before," he claimed. "There is no concern for the Kabul people."

The U.S. withdrawal will move all combat troops out of the country after America's longest war. That likely will include the personnel responsible for calling in and guiding airstrikes. Without the strikes, Roggio said the Afghan military likely will face a major offensive it now is too stretched to defend nationwide.

And the map will change again.

"They're going to have to consolidate their lines. They're going to have to abandon the south," Roggio said. "I just don't see how they survive otherwise. They'll just be picked apart piecemeal."

Information for this article was contributed by Rahim Faiez of The Associated Press.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT