Today's Paper Arkansas News Public Notices Elections Core Values Newsletters Sports Archive Obits Puzzles Opinion Story Ideas
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Arkansas Supreme Court orders secretary of state to clarify number of signatures in support of proposed marijuana amendment

by Stephen Simpson | September 13, 2022 at 7:08 a.m.
FILE - In this Aug. 15, 2019 file photo, marijuana grows at an indoor cannabis farm in Gardena, Calif.

The Arkansas Supreme Court has ordered that the secretary of state clarify the number of petitions it received for the proposed constitutional amendment that would legalize recreational marijuana as the court considers whether to allow the amendment to remain on the November ballot.

The state Supreme Court on Monday afternoon handed down its per curiam opinion that stated the court had issued a writ of mandamus to the secretary of state's office to decide the sufficiency of the proposed initiative petition.

"The Secretary of State is ordered to file proof of his decision by 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, September 14, 2022," the document states.

Steve Lancaster, counsel for Responsible Growth Arkansas, said the order was a "procedural step" to get clarification from the secretary of state.

Lancaster said he remains confident the court will rule to keep the recreational marijuana issue on the ballot.

"We see this as the court wanting to check the box that the secretary of state either says the petition is sufficient or insufficient," Lancaster said.

The decision is part of a weekslong court battle in which two ballot question committees opposed to the proposed amendment were allowed to intervene in the case that will determine whether the amendment remains on the ballot.

Safe and Secure Communities filed its motion Aug. 24, stating the committee was created to "educate the public about the consequences of legalizing marijuana for personal use, and advocate for the defeat of an amendment to the Arkansas Constitution allowing the regulated sale of adult-use cannabis in the state."

The respondent-intervenor for the committee is Michael McCauley, who is listed as treasurer of the organization.

The largest donation received by Safe and Secure Communities was $250,000 from Ronald Cameron, CEO of Mountaire Corp.

A week earlier the court had granted a request by the Save Arkansas from Epidemic committee, which stated it seeks to protect the interests and rights of Arkansans who oppose the legalization of recreational marijuana.

That request was filed by David Burnett in his capacity as chairman of the committee and AJ Kelly, a lawyer from Little Rock.

McCauley, an attorney in Illinois, said Monday that he doesn't discuss client matters and didn't have any knowledge of Monday's order.

Burnett, a police chief in Fairfield Bay and chairman of Save Arkansas from Epidemic, wasn't available for comment Monday afternoon.

Officials for Responsible Growth Arkansas filed a response last month to the initial motion to intervene, saying it came too late in the expedited proceeding without explanation, poses prejudice to petitioners by interjecting new issues when time is running short, and is unnecessary because respondents adequately represent intervenors' interests.

Earlier in August, the state Supreme Court granted a petition to allow the proposed constitutional amendment back on the November ballot until the state Supreme Court decides how to proceed with the Arkansas Board of Election Commissioners' decision to not approve the proposed amendment's ballot title.

The court ordered the secretary of state to conditionally certify Responsible Growth Arkansas' proposed initiated amendment pending its decision.

Officials for Responsible Growth Arkansas had filed a petition seeking a preliminary injunction because the Aug. 25 deadline for certification of initiated measures was pressing.

It also asked the court to order Secretary of State John Thurston to conditionally certify the petitioners' proposed amendment pending the court's decision.

The proposed amendment would issue adult-use cannabis cultivation and dispensary licenses to businesses that already hold licenses under the state's medical marijuana program, followed by an additional 40 licenses chosen by a lottery.

Board of Election Commissioners member Bilenda Harris-Ritter, the Republican Party's designee, made the motion to deny the ballot title and popular name for the amendment partly because it would repeal the current THC limits without explaining if a new limit would be set.

THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, is the main psychoactive compound in marijuana.

Lancaster argued the role of the Board of Election Commissioners is not to judge the amendment itself but to see if the ballot title has language that is misleading or omits information that could change voters' minds.

The initiative limits the sale of cannabis to people 21 or older and prohibits advertising and packaging designed to appeal to children. It provides regulatory oversight by limiting the number of licensed businesses, and does not allow for homegrown cannabis.

It also limits the number of cannabis licenses to 20 cultivators and 120 dispensaries statewide, which includes existing medical marijuana licenses.


Print Headline: State's high court demands clarification in pot ballot issue

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT