Today's Paper Arkansas News Legislature Newsletters Core Values Sports Public Notices Archive Obits Puzzles Opinion Story Ideas
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

High court refuses covid funds case

by GREG STOHR Bloomberg News (TNS) | January 18, 2023 at 4:00 a.m.

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Supreme Court turned away a Missouri appeal that sought to ensure states can cut taxes even as they receive $195 billion in federal pandemic relief money.

The justices without comment left in place a federal appeals court decision that said Missouri lacked legal standing to press a lawsuit over the requirements imposed under the American Rescue Plan Act.

Missouri is among several Republican-led states that sued after President Joe Biden signed the $1.9 trillion measure into law in March 2021. The law includes a provision that says a state can't use the money "to either directly or indirectly offset a reduction in the net tax revenue of such state."

Missouri claimed that the provision prohibits only the deliberate use of relief funds to pay for a tax cut. The state argued that the Treasury Department's interpretation of the law would sweep more broadly, blocking any new state tax policy that reduces revenue without some sort of offset.

The St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals faulted Missouri for not pointing to any particular state policy that might run afoul of the federal rule. The state was seeking "a quintessentially advisory opinion," something federal courts don't issue, Judge Jane Kelly wrote for the panel.

The rejection benefits the Biden administration, which is fighting legal battles around the country over the restriction. A different federal appeals court, the Cincinnati-based 6th Circuit, said in November the provision is too vague to be enforced.

Print Headline: High court refuses covid funds case

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT