Today's Paper Latest Coronavirus ­čö┤Children in Peril Quarantine Families Core values App Listen Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive

Comment history

JOHN BRUMMETT: Votes that don't matter

And that's what you get from rear bear.

November 13, 2018 at 3:57 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

JOHN BRUMMETT: Votes that don't matter

STFU

November 13, 2018 at 3:54 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

JOHN BRUMMETT: Votes that don't matter

"What I've suggested is not governed by the Constitution and would involve states making changes to the way they allocate EC votes, moving away from the winner take all in the states to proportional by CD"
~
That IS the end run around the intent of the compromise. THAT, as you well know, is exactly the subject, deceiver man.
~
The gob-smacking arrogance and hypocrisy of a party comprised of a coalition of angry minority interest groups (lollipop lickers) who wish to suppress another minority group (Patriotic Republicans) would be astonishing if we had not seen these very tactics deployed in every other socialist takeover throughout history.
~
Yearning for the dictatorship of the proletariat? Click here to see the many successful examples.
~
Oops, that link is broken. Seems there is only dictatorship, as the proletariat is perennially screwed by the mother f'kers that fool them into it.
~
Only a sexist, ageist, racist would disparage the character of old white men as a people group. It is that kind of hypocrisy that lets me know this is not the side I want to be on.

November 13, 2018 at 3:28 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

JOHN BRUMMETT: Votes that don't matter

Oh, no, rear bear. You stick words where the sun don't shine. I know you like sticking things up there, but not what I said. Standard for you and an understandable trait of the socialist propagandist.
Let me be very clear, you disingenuous deceiver.
I said, quoting here,
"Never being able to win an election because of rule changes contrary to the spirit of the Constitutional compromises made in order to ever form this country is a predicate for civil war."
Nothing at all said about a Constitutional amendment, which is pretty clearly neigh unto impossible, thus obviously not the subject. Only a blatant deceiver would attempt your approach.
I am talking about an end run around the spirit and intent of the existing Constitution. Of course you know that because you do these things with evil intent.
So again, with fresh clarity, if the socialist Democrats think they can rig the system to create a dictatorship of the urbanites, there are many rural inhabitants who are prepared to disagree with any intensity required to remain relevant.
~
Where does the food flow from, cityman;
Where does the power get ginned?
How far do your commuters drive, cityman;
How glad are they to leave at day's end?

November 13, 2018 at 2:10 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

CNN sues Trump, demanding return of Acosta to White House

I agree Acosta is not a journalist. It is belatedly obvious he is a propagandist masquerading as a reporter.
Acosta does not have the right to keep the mic after he has had his two questions. He has no right at all to attempt to provoke a debate.
His disregard for others waiting to ask their questions clearly defines the content of his character. Therefore, he is aptly judged as a giant Dick, worthy of shunning.

November 13, 2018 at 1:07 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

JOHN BRUMMETT: Votes that don't matter

Not being one to participate in the wanger-waving parades, I would prefer to be identified as a "drama king", thank you very much. I find the mere mention of santorum too disgusting to contemplate.
If the issue of an urban dictatorship had not been worked out by our forefathers, there would be no USA today. Our current Republic was established to address that issue. Socialist Democrats want to reverse that important compromise and risk civil war in their thirst for domination and control. I believe they shall have it, fully and enthusiastically, if they continue with their attempts to castrate (render moot) the non-believing citizenry.
Losing an election sucks, but is acceptable under the Constitution.
Never being able to win an election because of rule changes contrary to the spirit of the Constitutional compromises made in order to ever form this country is a predicate for civil war. Hell, even the suggestion of doing so causes the wiping of much gun oil. These are fighting words.

November 13, 2018 at 12:37 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

JOHN BRUMMETT: Votes that don't matter

Any move to create a dictatorship of the urbanites will be met with rural fury.

November 13, 2018 at 10:56 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

BRADLEY R. GITZ: The suspect electorate

Yes we do, skeptic.
The lunch table elite, those socialist Democrat bullies, never think the "lesser demographic" will fight back against their arrogant attempts at domination.
There is a reason we have all the guns and they want to take them away.

November 13, 2018 at 10:21 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

And there was a great calm

Seems the Mexicans still want Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. More, even.
~
REMEMBER THE ALAMO!
DEFEAT THE INVADING CARAVANS!
PUSH BACK THE FOREIGN NATIONALISTS!
BE A TRUE PATRIOT, THE NATIONAL INTEREST IS AT STAKE.
~
French President Moron dares to lecture US on patriotism and nationalism.
F'K THE WEAK FRENCH, THEY DON'T KNOW ANY THING ABOUT PATRIOTISM - FLEE THEIR COUNTRY, WHINE AND CRY FOR HELP - THAT'S WHAT FRENCH THINK IS PATRIOTISM.
Stupid, weak and deceitful French did not learn a damn think from our Revolution. See how badly they screwed theirs up. See how bad it remains.
Charles de Gaulle is a French Hero!
lol, lol, lol.

November 11, 2018 at 3:42 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Previous