Today's Paper Latest stories Obits Traffic Wally Hall Newsletters Weather Puzzles + games
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Boxes containing petitions in favor of a proposal to legalize casinos in Arkansas are delivered to the Arkansas secretary of state's office on Friday in Little Rock. Friday was the deadline for ballot measure groups to submit signatures to try and get their proposals on the November ballot. (AP Photo/Andrew Demillo)

The Quapaw and Cherokee tribes collectively contributed $1.2 million in June to the Driving Arkansas Forward committee promoting a proposed constitutional amendment that would authorize the state to license four casinos.

The Quapaw Tribe also made a non-monetary contribution of more than $180,000 last month to the Arkansas Jobs Coalition committee that also backs the proposed ballot measure. The tribe paid that much to a petition canvassing firm.

Monday was the deadline for ballot question committees to file their reports with the Arkansas Ethics Commission for June. Others that filed regarded proposals on minimum wage and term limits.

Earlier this month, the sponsors of the casino proposal estimated they turned in 96,170 signatures of registered voters to the secretary of state's office in their bid to qualify their ballot measure for the Nov. 6 general election ballot. The secretary of state's office is in the process of determining whether the sponsors turned in at least 84,859 valid signatures -- the minimum needed -- or whether they meet the threshold to get 30 more days to collect more signatures.

The proposed amendment would require the state Racing Commission to issue licenses for casinos in: Pope County, within 2 miles of Russellville; Jefferson County, within 2 miles of Pine Bluff; Southland Racing Corp., at or adjacent to Southland Gaming and Racing in West Memphis; and Oaklawn Jockey Club Inc., at or adjacent to Oaklawn Racing and Gaming in Hot Springs. State law now permits Oaklawn and Southland to offer so-called electronic games of skill, so the ballot proposal would allow them to expand their gambling operations.

The committees promoting this proposed constitutional amendment are called Driving Arkansas Forward and the Arkansas Jobs Coalition. Both committees are chaired by lobbyist Don Tilton, who represents the Quapaw Tribe that is interested in developing a casino in Pine Bluff.

In its report filed Monday with the Ethics Commission, the Driving Arkansas Forward committee reported receiving $1.25 million in contributions and spending $725,711.28 last month, leaving $537,088.72 in its campaign account as of June 30.

The largest contributors to the committee are the Downstream Development Authority of the Quapaw Tribe of Quapaw, Okla., that provided $707,000 and Cherokee Nation Businesses LLC of Catoosa, Okla., that chipped in $525,300, the committee reported. Other reported contributions last month included $10,000 apiece from the Gulfside Casino Partnership of Gulfport, Miss., and the Association of Gaming Equipment Manufacturers and $500 from Tilton.

In addition, the committee reported the Downstream Development Authority of the Quapaw Tribe made a non-monetary contribution of $15,800 in legal services from the Steel Wright & Gray law firm.

The committee's largest expenditures last month were $375,728 to Targeted Platform Media LLC for television ads and about $285,000 to the Arkansas Jobs Coalition for petition canvassing.

The Arkansas Jobs Coalition reported raising no contributions and spending no money last month. But it reported receiving $467,909.15 in non-monetary contributions last month.

That included non-monetary contributions totaling $285,000 from the Driving Arkansas Forward committee and about $182,000 from the Downstream Development Authority that paid National Ballot Access for petition canvassing.

"We are pleased by the financial support we've received from organizations willing to invest in better roads, lower taxes, new jobs and a stronger Arkansas economy," said Nate Steel, counsel for the committees.

Steel has said it's projected the proposal would raise about $120 million a year in net casino gambling tax revenue.

Fifty-five percent of the tax receipts would go to state general revenue fund and 17.5 percent to the Racing Commission for purses for live horse and greyhound racing and the rest to city and county governments where the casinos are located.

Meanwhile, the Arkansas Thoroughbred Racing and Breeding Alliance committee reported raising $10,000 in contributions from Oaklawn Jockey Club Inc. of Hot Springs and spending $2,170 for legal services with the law firm of Friday, Eldredge & Clark LLP of Little Rock in June.

In total, the alliance's committee reported receiving a total of $20,000 from Oaklawn Jockey Club and spending $11,089.14 mostly on legal services with Friday, Eldredge & Clark.

Eric Jackson, senior vice president for Oaklawn, is the chairman and treasurer for the committee, which "intends to monitor and comment on proposed constitutional amendments and other measures that may affect thoroughbred racing and/or breeding activities in Arkansas -- November 6, 2018," according to its statement of organization filed with the Ethics Commission.

Jackson could not be reached for comment by telephone on Monday.

Neither Oaklawn nor Southland have taken a position on the casino proposal.

MINIMUM WAGE

The Arkansans For A Fair Wage ballot committee -- promoting a proposed initiated act to raise the state's minimum wage from $8.50 to $11 per hour by 2021 -- reported raising $155,300 in contributions and spending $100,871.08 last month.

The committee received $100,000 from the Fairness Project, a non-profit in Washington, D.C., and $50,200 from the National Employment Law Project, a non-profit in Washington, D.C., as well as $5,000 from James Allred of Little Rock, who is retired, and $100 from committee treasurer David Couch of Little Rock, the committee reported.

The committee's expenditures included $96,565 with National Ballot Access of Lawrenceville, Ga., for canvassing, according to its report.

Meanwhile, a ballot question committee to advocate for the disqualification and defeat of the proposed initiated act registered with the Ethics Commission.

It's called Arkansans for a Strong Economy and chaired by Randy Zook, president of the Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce/Associated Industries of Arkansas. Its officers also include officials of the Arkansas Hospitality Association and Oil Marketers Association.

Earlier this month, proponents of this proposed initiated act said they turned in 69,413 signatures of registered voters in their bid to qualify the proposal for the Nov. 6 ballot. They need 67,887 valid signatures to appear on the ballot.

TERM LIMITS

The U.S. Term Limits ballot question committee reported a $49,210 contribution from the Florida-based U.S. Term Limits general fund and spending $49,210 with California-based Arno Petition Consultants for paid petition management in June.

In total, the committee has received contributions totaling $421,125.60 from U.S. Term Limits' general fund and spent the same amount with Arno Petition Consultants, according to its reports.

U.S. Term Limits advocates for term limits at all levels of government and has assisted in enacting and defending term limits on state legislatures in 15 states, according to its website.

U.S. Term Limits' board of directors includes Tim Jacob of Little Rock, who is a spokesman for the Arkansas' Term Limits ballot question committee.

The Arkansas Term Limits committee estimated that it turned in more than 135,000 signatures of registered voters for its proposed constitutional amendment to the secretary of state's office earlier this month. The secretary of state's office will have to verify that at least 84,859 of those signatures are valid for the measure to qualify for the ballot.

The proposed amendment would limit state lawmakers to serving a maximum of 10 years in the Legislature. They also would be restricted to three two-year terms in the House and two four-year terms in the Senate. Lawmakers' service on or after Jan. 1, 1993, would be included in calculating allowable terms and service under the proposed amendment.

Amendment 94, approved by voters in 2014, allows lawmakers to serve up to 16 years in the House, Senate or through service in both chambers. That limit doesn't count the two-year terms drawn by some senators, after the once-a-decade redistricting of legislative seats.

Before Amendment 94, state lawmakers were limited to serving six years in the House and eight years in the Senate. Some senators were able to serve more if they were elected to two four-year terms plus a redistricting-related two-year term.

A Section on 07/17/2018

Print Headline: Two tribes pour money into ballot measure on casinos

Sponsor Content

Comments

You must be signed in to post comments
  • RBBrittain
    July 17, 2018 at 8:36 a.m.

    Do the tribes expect to win one or both of the new casino licenses, as the Quapaw apparently wants to do in Pine Bluff? (I doubt either Oaklawn or Southland is for sale.) Or do they plan to open additional casinos in Arkansas if this passes, since Federal law allows tribes to independently conduct the same general types of gambling that state law allows non-tribal businesses to conduct?

  • hogfan2012
    July 17, 2018 at 8:58 a.m.

    Just don't understand why anyone would want to put a casino in Crime Bluff... You would get robbed in the parking lot before you get in the door, car would get broken into and certainly mugged on the way out if you had any money left....

  • hurricane46
    July 17, 2018 at 9:42 a.m.

    We don't need Indian casinos, too smokey, tight "machines", and you have to pay for drinks!. But seriously, if they want to do it right get casinos like MS has, Sams Town,Hollywood, etc.

  • Delta2
    July 17, 2018 at 9:42 a.m.

    @hogfan--same thing could happen in lots of areas in and around Little Rock.

  • Popsmith
    July 17, 2018 at 9:48 a.m.

    Do we really need more places to lose money?

  • skeptic1
    July 17, 2018 at 11:20 a.m.

    I agree, Pine Bluff is the worst place to put a casino for a whole litany of reasons, Little Rock the second worst. The Casino should be in an unincorporated area that can benefit from the jobs. Jefferson County for all intents and purposes is a penal colony and that is their economic base. Little Rock's political leaders cannot even keep the city off of the 10 most violent cities list, God help us if the casino was here.

  • dearlo
    July 17, 2018 at 12:28 p.m.

    Lonoke or White county would be great and is a much better area, we need those jobs!

  • Jfish
    July 17, 2018 at 12:31 p.m.

    I like how many amendments cannot stand own their own so they give them a hyped up name like Driving Arkansas Forward. This should be your first clue to be very skeptical of any proposal.

  • hah406
    July 17, 2018 at 1:49 p.m.

    Crime Bluff needs a casino about like it needs another street gang. hogfan has it right. And Pope county? Seriously? It is a dry county! Doubt the people there want folks gambling if they don't want them to buy liquor at the store.

  • Taron
    July 19, 2018 at 3:32 a.m.

    Since Pine Bluff is not favorable according to some, how about putting a casino in Conway, Fayetteville, Mountain Home, Rogers, Mena or Jonesboro? Why not Lonoke?

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT