Today's Paper Search Latest stories 🔴 Hogs live Drivetime Mahatma Traffic Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles + Games Archive
story.lead_photo.caption The House Financial Services Committee's ranking member Rep. Maxine Waters D-Calif., left, with committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, May 2, 2017, during the committee's hearing on overhauling the nation's financial rules. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

WASHINGTON -- Bipartisan legislation focused on easing regulations for small and midsize banks passed in the House on Tuesday and headed to President Donald Trump for his expected signature.

Although the bill provides some significant relief for larger financial institutions, it falls short of the sweeping overhaul of the Dodd-Frank post-crisis changes that Trump and most Republicans wanted.

The beneficiaries of most of the changes are community banks, which have complained that tougher regulations spurred by the 2008 financial crisis have unfairly made it more difficult for them to operate.

They'll get a break from new mortgage rules if they make fewer than 500 of them a year, which supporters of the bill said will give Americans more options for home loans.

And banks with less than $10 billion in assets will be exempted from the regulatory burden of complying with the Volcker Rule, which prohibits institutions from trading for their own profit and limits ownership of risky investments.

"This is a way to keep community banks more viable and have less costs in rules and regulations and spend more of that time, money and resources on customers," said Paul Merski, executive vice president for congressional relations at the Independent Community Bankers of America, a trade group that strongly backed the legislation.

The bill adds new consumer protections after Equifax Inc.'s data breach last year. Credit-reporting companies would be required to let consumers freeze and unfreeze their files for free. Active-duty members of the military also would get free credit monitoring.

There's wide bipartisan agreement on easing some regulations on small banks and expanding consumer protections. But the legislation also helps many larger banks, and that limited Democratic support.

The House voted 258-159, with 33 Democrats joining all but one Republican to pass the bill, called the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act.

The Senate approved the legislation 67-31 in March with the support of several moderate Democrats who face re-election this fall in states that Trump won by large margins.

The White House issued a statement ahead of the vote saying Trump's advisers would recommend he sign the bill.

Opponents focused on a key provision of the legislation that removes Dodd-Frank's mandatory stricter oversight for about two dozen banks with assets of as much as $250 billion. Federal Reserve regulators also will get more flexibility in how they oversee large banks.

"This bill guts many of the protections Democrats put in place to reduce the risks of bank failures and bailouts and ensure that banks don't bring down the economy," Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., said in urging her colleagues to oppose the bill.

The financial industry isn't suffering under Dodd-Frank, she said. Waters noted that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. reported Tuesday that U.S. banks had a record $56 billion in profits in the first quarter of the year.

That's a 27.5 percent increase from a year earlier, as profits were revved up by the corporate tax cuts enacted late last year.

Even if the bill is signed into law, the Federal Reserve will ultimately determine how much relief regional firms get -- and how soon. While losing the "too big to fail" label frees them from some stricter oversight and annual stress tests mandated by Dodd-Frank, banks with more than $50 billion in assets are still subject to other rules including the Fed's annual Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was enacted in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis with almost no Republican support. It was one of President Barack Obama's signature accomplishments.

The legislation toughened bank regulations, sought to avoid future bailouts by creating a process to shut down teetering financial giants, established a powerful panel of regulators to watch for signs of instability and created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to oversee credit cards, mortgages and other financial products.

Republicans and bankers complained from the start that the changes were too heavy-handed.

Trump has called Dodd-Frank a "very negative force" in the economy and vowed during the 2016 presidential campaign to dismantle it. One of his early actions upon taking office last year was to order the Treasury Department to review the law and propose changes.

Last June, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin recommended a major overhaul. But Democratic support in the Senate was necessary to make changes to the law.

Moderate Democrats wanted to focus on smaller banks and many of the Treasury Department's recommendations were not included in the bill, which was drafted by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Michael Crapo, R-Idaho, along with some of the committee's Democrats.

House leaders agreed to vote on the compromise bill that Senate Republicans negotiated with moderate Democrats in exchange for a promise that a broader set of House-passed rollbacks will get a vote later this year. Senate Democrats who backed the plan sponsored by Crapo have said they will oppose further changes.

Two frequently criticized pillars of Dodd-Frank were left intact.

The legislation does not remove the ability of regulators to designate large firms as a risk to the financial system and to try to shut them down if they're on the verge of failing without causing spillover effects to other companies as happened in 2008.

And the bill makes no structural changes to the consumer bureau, whose authority Republicans have sought to significantly weaken in part by making its chief serve at the pleasure of the president instead of only being removable for cause.

House Republicans, led by Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas, had hoped to address those issues. But Senate Democrats made clear they would not support any additional rollbacks.

House leaders agreed not to amend the Senate-passed bill, although they said they would continue to push other legislation to make more changes to Dodd-Frank.

But the Trump administration has other ways it can alter financial regulation.

Trump appointees to the Federal Reserve and other financial regulatory agencies are preparing to weaken the Volcker Rule for large banks. And Trump appointed Mick Mulvaney as the interim chief of the consumer bureau, where he has significantly scaled back the bureau's activities.

Still, Hensarling said many provisions in the bill originated in the House and would help more Americans get access to credit.

"This is the most pro-growth banking bill in a generation," Hensarling said. He lamented, "I wish it did gut Dodd-Frank," but said it doesn't.

Democratic opponents of the legislation said there were many good parts of the bill and that some changes in Dodd-Frank were needed. But they said the bill voted on Tuesday contained provisions that would weaken the financial system.

"It's a bad bill under the guise of helping community banks," said House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

The legislation would weaken the ability of regulators to enforce fair-lending requirements by exempting 85 percent of banks and credit unions from Dodd-Frank data-reporting requirements designed to help identify discriminatory practices.

The bill also includes some benefits for Equifax and other credit-reporting companies. They would get immunity from lawsuits over credit monitoring for active-duty service members, and another provision could make it easier for the firms to expand their businesses into providing credit scores for mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae, the Federal National Mortgage Association, and Freddie Mac, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the bill would add $671 million to the federal budget deficit over the next decade, largely because the changes would slightly increase the small chance that a systemically important financial institution would fail or a financial crisis would take place.

But the budget office admitted its estimate "is subject to considerable uncertainty" because of the difficulty of predicting a major bank failure or crisis.

Information for this article was contributed by Elizabeth Dexheimer of Bloomberg News and by Marcy Gordon of The Associated Press.

A Section on 05/23/2018

Print Headline: Banking changes approved by House


Sponsor Content

You must be signed in to post comments


  • TimberTopper
    May 23, 2018 at 6:14 a.m.

    Set it up so that the smaller banks can fail easier, than the larger ones.

  • Knuckleball1
    May 23, 2018 at 9:05 a.m.

    The Big Banks will be the next ones let off the hook and will happen very soon. Politicians don't care, they are only worried about who they can help that will give them money.

  • mrcharles
    May 23, 2018 at 10:59 a.m.

    I do remember charles keating and mother teresa, and RR.

    Isnt spanish hill a banker, did not he get a hefty amount of booty?

    I would submit fore your consideration that if the gop is for it, the common man will suffer but he will tough it out so he doesnt have to associate with minorities and unbelievers and commie democrats like John Glenn.

  • Illinoisroy
    May 23, 2018 at 12:19 p.m.

    Here we go again! "Government of the corporations, by the corporations and for the corporations". Honest Abe might cringe to see what this government has evolved into.