Today's Paper Search Latest Coronavirus Families Core values App Listen Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive
story.lead_photo.caption FILE PHOTOL Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/BENJAMIN KRAIN --8/1/2017-- Ken Bushe hands a photo ID to a poll worker at the Laman Library in North Little Rock in order to cast a ballot during early voting for a North Little Rock sales tax increase. ( Benjamin Krain)

LITTLE ROCK — Arkansas' highest court Thursday upheld a voter ID law that is nearly identical to a restriction struck down by the court four years ago.

The 5-2 decision from the Arkansas Supreme Court means the law, which requires voters to show photo identification before casting a ballot, will remain in effect in this year's midterm election. Unlike the measure struck down in 2014, the law approved last year allows voters to cast provisional ballots without a photo ID if they sign a sworn statement confirming their identities.

Opponents of the new measure had argued that it circumvented the 2014 ruling. But justices Thursday said lawmakers had the power to enact the restriction by labeling it a change to a constitutional amendment related to voter registration requirements and was "therefore constitutional."

"In our view, providing a system of verifying that a person attempting to cast a ballot is registered to vote is relevant and pertinent, or has a close relationship, to an amendment establishing a system of voter registration," the court said.

The Thursday ruling reversed a judge's ruling against the law, which was approved last year by the Republican-controlled Legislature and governor. A judge had blocked officials from enforcing the restriction, but justices in May stayed that ruling and kept the law in effect while they considered the case.

Arkansas officials argued that the new law complied with part of the Supreme Court's ruling that struck down the earlier measure. Justices in 2014 unanimously struck down that law, with a majority of the justices saying it unconstitutionally added a qualification to vote. Three justices, however, argued that the measure didn't get the two-thirds vote needed in the Legislature to change voter registration requirements.

A majority of the court has changed hands since that ruling, and more than two-thirds of the Arkansas House and Senate approved the new measure last year.

A justice who disagreed with the ruling Thursday questioned the court's argument that the law was related to voter registration, noting that the state doesn't require photo ID in order to register to vote.

"If providing photo identification were required at registration, requiring presentation of the card at the polling place would be more defensible," Justice Jo Hart wrote in a dissent. "Asking for a photo identification card at the polling place strikes me as locking the barn door after the horse has been stolen."

An attorney who challenged the law cited the same issue Thursday. Jeff Priebe, who represented a Little Rock voter opposed to the new law, said he was still analyzing the ruling to assess his options for addressing other concerns raised by the lower court that justices didn't rule on. Those include the argument that the photo ID requirement unconstitutionally imposes new requirements to vote.

"Though I respect the majority's decision, I still have significant concerns for voters in the state of Arkansas when it's easier to register than it is to actually vote," Priebe said.

Attorney General Leslie Rutledge, a Republican, praised the ruling, saying: "Today's decision protects the integrity of every voter's ballot and ensures that your vote cannot be stolen by someone pretending to be you at the polls."

The ruling comes less than two weeks before early voting begins for the state's Nov. 6 midterm election, which includes a bid by national Democrats to flip a Republican-held House seat in central Arkansas.

"We appreciate the Court issuing a ruling on this matter before the upcoming election, so that there is no added confusion for poll workers and voters," said Chris Powell, a spokesman for Republican Secretary of State Mark Martin.

Justice Courtney Goodson wrote the concurring opinion four years ago citing the two-thirds vote as the reason for striking down the previous law. She is now seeking re-election in November in a race that has already drawn heavy spending from conservative groups opposing her bid. Goodson joined the majority Thursday in upholding the revived law.

The November ballot will also include a proposal to further enshrine voter ID in the Arkansas Constitution.

Read Friday's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.


Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • jiminyc56
    October 11, 2018 at 11:07 a.m.

    I always have showed my I.D. anyway. Never understood how someone can vote without a proof of their identity. I have to show I.D. to get on a airplane, to drive a car so why not to vote? Just another dirty liberal trick to try to influence elections.

  • UoABarefootPhdFICYMCA
    October 11, 2018 at 11:24 a.m.

    I have always shown my ID even as independent.
    Now we wait to see which party is going to try to allow non documents to have ID cards and vote locally like
    California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Vermont, and Washington

  • Packman
    October 11, 2018 at 1:09 p.m.

    So much voter suppression. So little election integrity. Wait, what?

    October 11, 2018 at 3:16 p.m.

    OCTOBER 11, 2018 AT 1:09 P.M.
    So much voter suppression. So little election integrity. Wait, what?
    A bug Amen to the voter Suppression,
    Republicans just doing anything they can to attempt to get rid of your vote. How else can they win??

  • ObieOne
    October 11, 2018 at 3:54 p.m.

    Beartrap, what an ignorant “msm Talking Point”. If the Only way your Corrupt Liberal Party can get Votes is to Bus multiple loads of illegals with Fake ID’s all provided by the DNC funded by Soros, give Drivers Licenses to ILLEGAL Immigrants as an “ID” which automatically puts you on the voter roles, and vote multiple times with multiple ID’s of deceased folks and corrupt Voter Monitors “”stuffing” the ballot boxes with hundreds of fake votes, then it’s time to do away with the party.

    Not only have all these events been Proven all across the country, you only have to watch the dozens of Veritas Undercover Videos Of the DNC Operatives in action on YouTube. No Suppression going on here, just trying to Reduce the Fake Votes.

  • mozarky2
    October 11, 2018 at 4:33 p.m.

    OBIEONE, the dims have other, proven methods-throwing the borders wide open to replace the voters they've lost due to their corrupt ways.
    Thankfully, the new Supreme Court will, in all likelihood, allow these much needed restraints on illegal voting. In fact, I'm sure of it.
    BTW, who was the "educator" who proclaimed the other day that she was glad they'd made Justice Kavanaugh's life miserable? No matter, really. I'm sure he'll be only too happy to return the favor over the next 30+ years...

  • LR1955
    October 11, 2018 at 4:42 p.m.

    How many legal US Citizen voters does the ID requirement really affect ?

  • RBBrittain
    October 11, 2018 at 4:57 p.m.

    @Obieone: Nope, NONE of those are proven. (California does give DLs to undocumented aliens *and* auto-register CITIZENS from their DLs, but it does NOT auto-register aliens.) Veritas is FAKE NEWS.

  • abb
    October 11, 2018 at 5:17 p.m.

    You shouldn't be able to vote unless you have an enhanced CHCL or federal (enhanced)acceptable drivers license.

    Things you need an ID for: Driving, boarding a plane, doctor/hospital visit, getting a job, at the pharmacy, bank transactions, applying to school, applying for credit, establish utilities, buying a gun, buying a car, car resistration, donating blood, setting up Social Security, pawn shops, writing a check, buying insurance, buying train/bus tickets, volunteer at some orgs, check out a book buying a house, apartment rentals.....and there are many more.

    I'd say use purple ink in addition to ID and anyone that doesn't have one gets a contested ballot immediately checked on ACIC or NCIC. Then into the contested ballot pile.

  • Skeptic1
    October 11, 2018 at 7:27 p.m.

    You have to have a state ID to get food stamps and welfare and a library card, so other than wanting illegal aliens and felons to vote, or dead people, why would anyone object?