Today's Paper Search Latest In the news Traffic #Gazette200 Listen Digital replica FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles + Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
story.lead_photo.caption Special to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette - 04-25-2019 - A frame grab from Little Rock police dash cam video shows Officer Charles Starks being escorted from the scene of a deadly police shooting on Feb. 22.

The Little Rock Police Department released its investigative report into a police officer who fatally shot 30-year-old Bradley Blackshire during a Feb. 22 traffic stop, with documents showing the officer telling investigators he “blacked out” and couldn’t remember key parts of the shooting.

The documents obtained by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Thursday come days after prosecutors declined to file criminal charges against Officer Charles Starks, who repeatedly shot his gun into Blackshire’s car during a traffic stop near West 12th Street and South Rodney Parham Road.

Prosecutors on Friday cleared Starks of any criminal charges, affirming his use of force was justified because Blackshire accelerated toward the officer.

Document

Officer Charles Starks investigative file

View

Video released weeks ahead of the decision shows Starks firing at least 15 times into the car, including while the car continued to move as Starks lay on the hood, still shooting.

Blackshire died at the scene.

Investigative files containing interviews with Starks after the shooting state he recalled the vehicle striking his leg, and Starks acknowledged the car wasn’t accelerating violently before he began shooting.

He could not recall when or how he ended up on Blackshire’s car, but said he felt he was going to be run over and killed.

“Officer Starks stated there was a period of time he did not remember or had blacked out,” the report said.

Footage of the encounter captured from multiple sources shows Starks pull up to Blackshire and repeatedly order him out of the car.

Starks can be heard saying “get out of the car, dude” and speaking into his radio telling dispatchers he had Blackshire at gunpoint as he ordered the man to show his hands.

Blackshire can be heard asking what he did before saying: “What are you gonna shoot me for?”

Starks begins shooting as the car moves toward him, the dash camera video shows.

“I was absolutely convinced in that moment that that’s how I was gonna die,” Starks said in an interview with detectives.

Video captured from another officer -- identified as Michael Simpson -- shows him speed into the parking lot and hit Blackshire’s car, while Starks continues firing on the car’s hood.

Investigators noted 13 bullet holes in the front windshield and on the hood of the Nissan Altima. Another bullet hit a nearby car.

Starks was treated and released from the hospital on the same day.

Police have said officers stopped Blackshire after the rental Nissan he was driving was flagged as being stolen.

His passenger, 21-year-old Desaray Clarke, told officers Blackshire had a gun after she was handcuffed, and Blackshire had been reaching into his pocket before Starks fired, documents show.

Police recovered a handgun in the car Blackshire was in, reports show. The report shows the gun police recovered was in “plain view” on the passenger side front floorboard with a bullet in the chamber.

The state Crime Lab registered the gun as being stolen.

A witness told investigators Blackshire and another person had been smoking drugs before the shooting, and investigators found a white powdery substance and a rolled up bill in the car.

The Crime Lab’s report said the powder didn’t test positive for cocaine, and medical files within the report were sealed.

The heavily redacted investigative file reviewed by the Democrat-Gazette contains hundreds of pages of reports, interviews and forensic testing that were forwarded to the prosecutor's office.

Pulaski County Prosecutor Larry Jegley declined to criminally charge Starks, saying in a letter Friday that “the use of deadly force by Mr. Blackshire was as imminent as a stepped on accelerator and no different from a pulled trigger."

Disciplinary reports show Starks had several complaints lodged against him that led to more than two week’s worth of suspensions.

In 2016, Starks was suspended for 10 days without pay after getting into a fight at a movie theater and failing to identify himself as a police officer, according to a suspension letter.

A superior officer recommended Starks be fired, citing the fight and other past employment issues, and writing in a report that “he has been a difficult employee to manage” and “seems to gravitate toward conflict.”

The department relieved Starks of police duty days after the shooting, stripping him of his badge and gun and the ability to do any police work.

He has remained on the city’s payroll for the duration of the investigation.

The shooting and decision to later not charge Starks have prompted a handful of demonstrations around the city calling for Starks to be fired and charged in Blackshire's death.

Following the completion of an internal review of Starks' actions, which will determine whether he violated any departmental policies, Chief Keith Humphrey will decide whether to take any disciplinary action.

Blackshire’s family and supporters have rallied multiple times, demanding the swift release of dash camera video of the shooting, as well as Starks' prosecution.

The shooting has renewed policy pushes for officer body cameras and a citizen review board to oversee the police department.

Both are efforts Little Rock Mayor Frank Scott Jr. has previously pledged to enact.

The U.S. Department of Justice is also conducting a civil rights review of the shooting. A timetable hasn’t been set for the completion of that review.

Read Friday's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.

CORRECTION: Due to an editing error, a previous version of this story misstated who will decide on potential disciplinary action in Starks' case. Little Rock Police Chief Keith Humphrey will make that decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

You must be signed in to post comments

Comments

  • MBAIV
    April 25, 2019 at 2:19 p.m.

    No point in discussing this - since we have "biased talking primates" like MrCharles to tell us like it is.
    .
    Blackshire had a .45 he didn't use but he did use the car as a weapon. I suppose some of you would want the officer to wait til he had been shot or rolled under the moving vehicle before you would allow him to defend himself. Hope it never happens to you. We'd see who Blueovalz's "pussies" really are. Let the bleeding heart be yours, inside the crime scene tape.

  • Thumper01
    April 25, 2019 at 2:48 p.m.

    Obey a police officer’s orders.

  • GeneralMac
    April 25, 2019 at 2:51 p.m.

    One poster once stated that the cop should NOT have had a gun drawn as he approached the STOLEN VEHICLE.

    " gun holstered"........" talk calmly "..." ask if he REALIZED the car was stolen "

    I guess if you are a "thug sympathizer" you offer up crazy solutions.

  • reality1963
    April 25, 2019 at 3:44 p.m.

    I am in full support of the ofgicer. Thank you for eliminating this dangetous, criminal element from LR.

  • Foghorn
    April 25, 2019 at 4:03 p.m.

    Absolute.BS. If LRPD keeps this POS on the payroll after this, the new chief needs to be sent packing. Not to mention, any further protests will be absolutely warranted.

  • Packman
    April 25, 2019 at 4:06 p.m.

    Hey blueo - I'm guessing you're the pu$$y. And an extremely dumb one to boot. If ANYBODY can reasonably believe their life is in danger from attack by a bad guy, they can legally use lethal force to protect themselves - it's called "self-defense" and a concept recognized by every state in the US. Admit it, blueo, you just hate cops.

  • Moonglowalso
    April 25, 2019 at 4:18 p.m.

    Wouldn't shooting out the tires have stopped the car?

  • LR1955
    April 25, 2019 at 4:32 p.m.

    biased talking primates; you’re one too mrchuck

  • Foghorn
    April 25, 2019 at 4:36 p.m.

    Pack - You stupid POS, what you describe is ‘stand your ground’ which we thankfully don’t yet have in AR. You can’t LEGALLY claim ‘threat’ and murder someone on that basis expecting to walk away. You will/should be held to account and made to PROVE a threat - unless you’re a cop.

  • susan918crosbygmailcom
    April 25, 2019 at 4:53 p.m.

    Is anyone in this group a law enforcement officer??
    Just curious. However I must admit if the driver had been white this wouldn't have been an issue. I am curious though if the officer had been black would it still be an issue?

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT