Today's Paper Search Latest stories Listen March Mania contest Traffic Legislature Newsletters Obits Weather Puzzles + Games
story.lead_photo.caption Sen. Bart Hester, R-Cave Springs, is shown in this file photo.

State prison officials have said for months that they are unable or unwilling to maintain a supply of execution drugs under current laws that allow the disclosure of the names of companies that manufacture the drugs.

On Monday, lawmakers filed a bill to end that disclosure.

The confidentiality provisions in Senate Bill 464, by Sen. Bart Hester, R-Cave Springs, and Rep. John Maddox, R-Mena, would give broad exemptions from the state's Freedom of Information Act to any documents that "may" identify, or lead to the identification of, drug makers, suppliers, testers or transporters.

The plan quickly earned the support of Gov. Asa Hutchinson and Attorney General Leslie Rutledge, who together work to administer capital punishment in Arkansas.

A spokesman for the Arkansas Department of Correction said on Monday that the agency had yet to take an official position on SB464, which also includes criminal penalties for anyone who "recklessly discloses" documents covered by the proposed law.

The prison department, which holds 30 men on death row at the Varner Unit in Lincoln County, announced last July that it had ended its search for execution drugs, after the Arkansas Supreme Court ordered the agency to produce certain documents related to the drugs to members of the public who sought them through public records requests.

[RELATED: Complete Democrat-Gazette coverage of the Arkansas Legislature]

The method of execution now used in Arkansas calls for a three-drug "cocktail" -- comprised of the sedative midazolam, the paralytic vecuronium bromide and a heart-stopping dose of potassium chloride. The makers of those drugs have accused the Department of Correction of bypassing company controls in order to acquire the drugs from third-party suppliers.

Each of the three drugs once possessed by the department have expired, spokesman Solomon Graves said Monday, and the department has been unable to acquire replacements.

Other states faced with similar difficulties in maintaining supplies of execution drugs from pharmacists have turned to alternative methods. Last year, Oklahoma announced it would become the first state to switch to suffocation through nitrogen gas as its primary form of execution. Mississippi and Alabama have also approved the method, though it has yet to be tested, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

Changing the method of execution, however, would likely result in years of subsequent litigation from the prisoners facing death. The state's current protocol has been upheld by both the Arkansas and U.S. supreme courts, and some lawmakers have said they are hesitant about a change.

"I'd take them out behind the barn to shoot them," said Hester, the sponsor of SB464. "But we can't get that passed."

Hester said he hoped that by giving assurances of secrecy to suppliers willing to sell execution drugs to the Department of Correction, executions could resume again before the end of the year.

Others, however, responded to the filing of the bill on Monday with concerns about transparency of the execution process.

"I want to give it more thought, but on first blush it appears to me that we should be more open and transparent with something as serious as the death penalty," said Sen. Joyce Elliott, D-Little Rock, the chairman of a legislative subcommittee that oversees prisons.

Ashley Wimberley, the executive director of the Arkansas Press Association, said the bill and its criminal penalties for those whot disclose documents related to executions would have a "chilling impact on free speech and whistle-blower rights."

"They are taxpayer-funded actions that require transparency and accountability throughout the entire process," Wimberley said. "In its current form, this bill keeps almost everything about this solemn government function shielded from public scrutiny."

Asked how the public would be assured that prison officials are using the correct drugs under the law without the records to back it up, Hester said people would simply have to trust the Department of Correction.

"The department's saying they are," Hester said.

Many of the world's largest pharmaceutical manufacturers have for years been opposed to their products being used to kill people, and have attempted to install controls among their distributors in order to keep their products out of the hands of state executioners.

In response, lawmakers have enacted laws to keep their drug suppliers secret.

The Method of Execution Act passed in 2015 allowed prison officials to keep confidential or redact records that would directly identify the suppliers of the state's execution drugs.

However, the law specifically allowed for the release of drug labels and package inserts, documents that come along with the purchase of pharmaceutical drugs. After The Associated Press and other reporters later used those documents to identify the original drugmakers -- and the state Supreme Court upheld their disclosure under public records laws -- several companies came forward and said the department had skirted safeguards to obtain their products.

Third-party distributors and the eventual suppliers to the Department of Correction can face reprisals from manufacturing companies if they are found to have violated company protocols.

"If you disclose anything, they go and shut down the provider," Hester said.

Graves, the prisons spokesman, said on Monday that provisions of the bill that would make it a Class D felony -- punishable by up to six years in prison -- to "recklessly" disclose protected drug records were not part of the department's input during the bill drafting process.

Both Hester and the attorney general's office said they worked closely with Maddox and the governor to draft the legislation.

Hester declined to say who included the criminal penalties for disclosure.

Amanda Priest, a spokeswoman for Rutledge, said in a statement Monday that SB464 would "ensure that lawful jury sentences are carried out for heinous acts committed by those individuals awaiting justice."

Arkansas has not carried out an execution since April 2017, when four men were put to death over a two-week period. The state had originally planned eight executions that month, but half were halted by courts.

In part due to difficulties in maintaining a supply of drugs, and in part due to extensive litigation, the 2017 executions were the first carried out by the state in more than a decade.

Metro on 03/05/2019

Print Headline: Bill would end disclosures on execution drugs


Sponsor Content


You must be signed in to post comments
  • hah406
    March 5, 2019 at 8:50 a.m.

    Hey Bart, if "they", whoever that is, have the power to "go and shut down the provider," then that may indicate that many people are not in favor of the death penalty. I am OK with certain criminals being executed, but I want full disclosure as to how and with what substances we are preforming those acts. However, I will point out that it is intellectually incongruent to be pro-life / anti-abortion and pro death penalty. Pick a morally congruent position and stick with it.

  • GOHOGS19
    March 5, 2019 at 10 a.m.

    good bill long overdue

  • LRCrookAtty
    March 5, 2019 at 10:21 a.m.

    We need to get rid of the death penalty. We as a people cannot even decide if whole milk or egg yolks are good for us or not good for us. Therefore, those same people (actually less intelligent people) choose to put someone to death every year.

  • GeneralMac
    March 5, 2019 at 11:13 a.m.

    Life in prison w/o parole instead.

    However, NO VISITORS with the exception being a visit by a clergy of your choice.

    No leaving cell to ATTEND worship services .

    Clergy member comes to cell on a scheduled visit .

  • Illinoisroy
    March 5, 2019 at 12:11 p.m.

    how about using all the confiscated opiods?

  • seitan
    March 5, 2019 at 1:23 p.m.

    There was some concern before that our "trusted servants" were not buying the drugs legally. Is this to help cover up that kind of activity?

    Just get rid of the death penalty.

  • tngilmer
    March 5, 2019 at 4:33 p.m.

    If you are going to have a death penalty, just use a .357 to the back of the skull from a distance of 18 inches. It will cause death instantly and cartridges are readily available.