Today's Paper Latest Coronavirus Cooking Families Core values App Listen Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive
story.lead_photo.caption Senate President Pro Tempore Jim Hendren talks with Sen. Cecile Bledsoe on Wednesday after Hendren’s bill to provide $97 million a year in income tax cuts largely for low- and moderate-income Arkansans through a tax increase on tobacco products was narrowly approved. The bill faces a tough hurdle in the House Revenue and Taxation Committee. More photos are available at ( Arkansas Democrat-Gazette / Thomas Metthe)

The Arkansas Senate on Wednesday narrowly approved legislation that would provide about $97 million a year in income tax cuts targeted largely for low- and moderate-income Arkansans, paid for by tax increases on tobacco products.

The Senate voted 18-14 to approve Senate Bill 571 by Senate President Pro Tempore Jim Hendren, R-Sulphur Springs. Eighteen votes were required for the bill's approval in the 35-member Senate.

The legislation would achieve the income tax cut by creating a refundable state earned income tax credit; increasing the standard deduction; and eliminating a bracket in the tax table for people with incomes up to $22,200 a year.

The bill also would levy a special excise tax on cigarettes and a privilege tax on e-cigarettes and vaping products.

The bill's next hurdle is the House Revenue and Taxation Committee, which is chaired by Rep. Joe Jett, R-Success, who opposes the bill.

"Every dime that is collected in any taxes is returned to the taxpayers, period," under his bill, Hendren said in making his pitch to senators.

"The whole purpose of the [earned income tax credit] trust fund is to make sure that there is a place to collect the revenue so that it can then be redistributed in a responsible way back to taxpayers," he said.

Illnesses directly related to smoking cost the state's taxpayers $795 million a year through the Medicaid program and tobacco taxes total $230 million a year, Hendren said.

[RELATED: Complete Democrat-Gazette coverage of the Arkansas Legislature]

"That means everybody else is paying a half-billion dollars in taxes to compensate for the cost of health care directly related to the use of tobacco," he said.

"We are one of the most unhealthy states. We have higher rates of tobacco use than the national average. What is going on in our schools with vaping is astounding and somewhat terrifying in talking with administrators," Hendren said.

"I would argue it is time to rearrange the deck chairs," he said.

Hendren said the bill will make low- and medium-income families a priority "when we start trying to rebalance the tax code." He added that he backed the governor's plans to reduce the top individual income tax rate this year as well as the governor's plans to cut rates for low- and middle-income earners in 2015 and 2017.

He said his bill would reduce the $340 state tax bill for a single mother with two children and income of $19,000 a year to a $77 refund.

But Sen. Trent Garner, R-El Dorado, who voted against the bill, told his colleagues that "this is a redistribution of wealth from all to a few.

"This is a bad policy. This will hurt the people we are claiming that we care about," he said.

Garner said the state's cigarette taxes will be higher in Arkansas than in Louisiana.

"Who do you think that is going to affect?" he asked.

The state's current cigarette tax is $1.15 a pack. Hendren said the new excise tax of 20 percent on the price of cigarettes would boost the price of cigarettes from between 80 cents to $1.20 a pack depending on their price. The finance department projects purchases of fewer packs of cigarettes a year ranging from 20 million to 120 million packs a year in the state due to the bill.

According to the Tax Foundation, excise taxes on cigarettes are $2.03 per pack in Oklahoma, $1.41 in Texas, $1.08 in Louisiana, 68 cents in Mississippi, 62 cents in Tennessee and 17 cents in Missouri.

Sen. Bob Ballinger, R-Hindsville, who voted against the bill, told senators that the cost to the state's Medicaid program from eating cheeseburgers and soda is more than the costs from vaping.

But Hendren said it's" ludicrous" to compare the amount of health care costs associated with cheeseburgers to lung cancer, nicotine and addicted products.

Sen. Missy Irvin, R-Mountain View, who voted for the bill, said she is incredibly alarmed about the growing epidemic of vaping in the schools.

"I am not sticking my head in the sand. I don't think anybody should stick our head in the sand. When this is happening with our teenagers, we have got to address that," she said.

According to the state Department of Finance and Administration, SB571 would:

• Increase the standard deduction from $2,200 to $3,300, effective for tax years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2020, which would reduce state tax revenue by $41.7 million a year.

• Create a refundable earned income tax credit, effective for tax years beginning Jan. 1, 2021.

The credit would be in the amount of at least 5 percent of the federal earned income tax credit and could be adjusted upward or downward depending on the tobacco tax collections that would be used to fund the earned income tax credit.

About 300,000 Arkansans have claimed a federal earned income tax credit in each of the past five years.

Creating an earned income tax credit would reduce state tax revenue by $38.3 million a year if it's 5 percent of the federal earned income tax credit.

• Eliminate the 2 percent individual income tax rate for taxable income of $4,500 to $8,899 for people with taxable income of $22,200, effective for tax years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2020, which would reduce revenue by $16.7 million a year, according to the finance department.

• Levy a new special excise tax on cigarettes sold in Arkansas of 20 percent of the retail price collected by the retailer at the time of sales to the consumer. The tax would become effective Sept. 1.

• Levy a new e-cigarette privilege tax at the rate of 68 percent of the selling price from the manufacturer or wholesaler to the retailer on e-cigarettes sold in the state. E-cigarettes include vaping products or an e-liquid product. That tax also would take effect Sept. 1.

The finance department projects the tax on e-cigarettes and vaping products would raise about $5.5 million in fiscal 2020 and then $7.4 million in fiscal 2021, so most of the increased revenue would be raised by the 20 percent excise tax on cigarettes., Hendren said.

Asked about the prospects for the bill in the House, Hendren said "I think it's a challenge.

"If was easy, anybody would do it, so it is not going to be easy and it is going to be an uphill climb. But it is not impossible. I wouldn't have filed it if I thought it was impossible," he told reporters.

Hendren said he'll most likely present the bill to a House committee in two weeks. The Legislature returns Monday.

"It may take another week for us to fully have any kind of discussions about potential compromises," he said.

The next hurdle for the bill is the House Revenue and Taxation Committee, whose chairman, Jett, and a key committee member Rep. Lane Jean, R-Magnolia, have signaled their opposition to the bill.

"This [bill] kind of fell out of the sky on me two or three weeks ago," Jett said Wednesday night.

He said he hasn't been involved in discussions about a potential compromise.

House Speaker Matthew Shepherd, R-El Dorado, assigned the bill to "Rev and Tax due to the scope and length of the bill," House spokeswoman Cecillea Pond-Mayo said in a text message to this newspaper. Another option would have been the House Rules Committee, which often considers tobacco legislation.

The bill's House sponsor is Rep. Lee Johnson, R-Greenwood. The bill has 39 co-sponsors in the House.

Gov. Asa Hutchinson, who hasn't taken a position on Hendren's legislation, had no additional comment about the bill on Wednesday, said his spokesman, J.R. Davis.

Last week, the governor said he appreciated the effort by Hendren and the bill's other sponsors to provide tax relief to those with lower incomes, like the state did in 2017, and it's important that any more tax relief be offset on the revenue side. The governor is Hendren's uncle.

Last month, the governor signed into law legislation that would implement his plan to trim the state's top individual income tax rate from 6.9 percent to 5.9 percent over a two-year period. The tax cut is projected by state officials to reduce state tax revenue by $97 million a year after it's fully implemented.

Hutchinson last week signed legislation that would raise about $95 million a year more for the state Department of Transportation for highways by imposing a wholesales tax on gas and diesel fuel, increasing fees for electric and hybrid vehicles, and tapping casino tax revenues or other state funds.

Gallery: Arkansas General Assembly Day 66

Print Headline: Tax measure narrowly gets Arkansas Senate's OK


Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • JIMBOB47
    March 21, 2019 at 7:44 a.m.

    'Lower' income folks are the largest consumers of tobacco products, so we are in essence giving them a tax break so they can pay the extra tax on their tobacco purchases? This is no different than the taxes on 'sin' products of before... raised the tax on tobacco products to pay for cessation programs and other 'medical' facilities - in so doing, the plan was to help reduce the consumption of tobacco - so reducing the consumption reducing the revenue... none of that made sense either.. Why don't they just tax TOILET PAPER that EVERYONE uses and be done with it!! No one can complain because it hits everyone equally and there is NO toilet paper lobby!!!

  • lgoins
    March 21, 2019 at 8:18 a.m.

    I hope it gives enough relief to offset the $100 Tax on my Prius. You know - the tax on things that actually HELP the so-called Global Warming. Nothing like doing the right thing, and then getting a tax on it. Something totally wrong with that picture.

  • Seitan
    March 21, 2019 at 8:36 a.m.

    Tax obesity. Oh my, we would be a rich state then.

  • UoABarefootPhdFICYMCA
    March 21, 2019 at 9:25 a.m.

    ill wait for the poor people to respond.
    i imagine the very lowest among the homeless etc would simply respond
    "we dont file our income taxes so i guess you'll just be keeping that extra money, good for you"