Today's Paper Search Latest App In the news Traffic #Gazette200 Listen Digital FAQ Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles/Games Archive
ADVERTISEMENT

Our nation is now staring at trillion-dollar annual deficits. The Congressional Budget Office in a report this month warned the nation once again that our yearly red ink could top $1 trillion as soon as next year. Our national debt is projected to grow faster than the economy--forever.

How many warnings will it take for our leaders to pay attention? What is the tipping point that will force them to act?

During the past two years, our Congress and president ran up a massive bill, adding $2.4 trillion of new debt over the next decade. It was a bipartisan spending spree--from tax cuts to spikes in defense and non-defense domestic spending. Everyone got to throw something onto the national credit card.

Never at a time of such economic prosperity have our deficits been so high. During times of growth, our leaders should have paid down the debt and addressed our underfunded and insolvent social safety net programs. Instead, they poured debt-fueled stimulus into the economy and created a short-term sugar high at the expense of our long-term financial security.

Our leaders should hang their heads in shame for where they have led us. The deterioration is so dramatic that some public figures are testing out a once-fringe argument that debt doesn't really matter in an attempt to diminish the threat.

Ask the average American if they are happy that more than $2,000 of their tax bill this year went just to interest payments on the debt. Or that on our current path we will one day spend more on interest each year than on the military or Medicare. It will certainly matter then.

How do we respond to a crisis when our debt is larger than the entire economy? Or double the size? Or triple?

Record debt doesn't just hurt the nation's bottom line, it hurts our people. It slows income growth, crowds out other priorities, pushes up interest rates on mortgages and credit cards, and passes the buck (along with less opportunity) to the next generation.

There was a time when bipartisan compromise was a good thing that solved problems. In fact, it brought us budget surpluses once. Our leaders need to meet in the sensible center to solve this deficit problem once again.

------------v------------

Tim Penny served Minnesota in the House of Representatives from 1983 to 1995. David Minge served Minnesota in the House of Representatives from 1993 to 2001. Both are board members of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

Editorial on 05/16/2019

Print Headline: A trillion here, a trillion there ...

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor Content

Archived Comments

  • FordP
    May 17, 2019 at 10:40 a.m.

    Penny and Minge are changing their tune. These two leftists are poster children for the mess we are in today. No 'great society' solution was too insignificant to ignore for these two 'tax-and-spend' liberal progressives.

    It never ceases to amaze me how easily the progressives can willingly unleash the power of the treasury, and saddle our children with the costs. Calls for 'bipartisan' solutions is hypocrisy at the highest order of magnitude. These 'do-gooder' leftists are the root cause of today's issues. Perhaps they can muster some ideas about how to get out of this mess they got us in...

    Make no mistake, Penny and Minge would find solutions. As in a return to to 70% tax rates of the '50s and '60s, and embracing the socialism of northern Europe. These two village idiots need to be called out for the communists they are...

    I'm just sayin...

  • GeneralMac
    May 17, 2019 at 3:11 p.m.

    Why was Gramm-Rudman ever ended ?

    I recall when politicians actually abided by Gramm-Rudman regarding new spending.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT