Today's Paper Search Latest Coronavirus Families Core values App Listen Story ideas iPad Weather Newsletters Obits Puzzles Archive
story.lead_photo.caption Workers test a spray to be used for controlling contaminated dust in the decommissioning process at Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station in Vernon, Vt., one of several shuttered nuclear power plants in the U.S. that are being bought by cleanup companies that promise to speed up the decontamination process.

PLYMOUTH, Mass. -- Companies specializing in nuclear demolition and radioactive waste storage are buying up aging U.S. reactors and promising to decommission them in dramatically less time than their utility owners had planned -- eight years instead of 60 in some cases.

Viewed by experts as an emerging trend in the nuclear power industry, the sales of these retired or soon-to-be-retired reactors present a paradox for residents, state officials and nuclear watchdogs.

Once a reactor is shut down, the radioactive mess left behind must be cleaned up, spent nuclear fuel packed for long-term storage and the plant itself dismantled. Few argue that decommissioning a facility within a matter of years is less preferable than the decades-long approach called "safe storage," in which shuttered plants are left dormant while radioactive elements slowly decay.

Yet the speedier approach raises questions about whether the timetables are consistent with environmentally safe cleanups, and whether the buyers have the experience and money to manage multiple projects.


"When it was 60 years, we were up in arms that it was 60 years," said Janet Tauro, chairman of New Jersey Clean Water Action, referring to initial plans for decommissioning Oyster Creek in Forked River. The nation's oldest commercial reactor closed last year, shortly after owner Exelon Generation announced the sale to Holtec International.

"And then we hear it's going to be expedited to eight years," Tauro continued. "It's great to get it over with, but are there corners that are going be cut?"

Holtec, a privately held, global corporation that manufactures giant containers for storing spent radioactive fuel after it is removed from reactor cores, also has deals in place to buy several plants owned by Entergy Corp., including Pilgrim in Plymouth, Mass., closing May 31; Palisades in Covert, Mich., scheduled for closure in 2022 ; and two reactors expected to close within two years at Indian Point in Buchanan, N.Y., according to public statements and documents filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

"Our commitment to the nuclear industry includes taking ownership of shutdown nuclear plants so that we can safely and efficiently decommission the plants so that the land can be returned to productive use," Holtec spokesman Joy Russell said in an email.

The company did not make officials available for interview, but strongly defended its 30-year nuclear industry track record.

The proposed sales await Nuclear Regulatory Commission approval, with decisions expected in the coming weeks and months, commission spokesman Neil Sheehan said. In March, the commission asked Holtec for additional guarantees that its decommissioning subsidiary has sufficient resources to handle multiple cleanups simultaneously.

In a response letter, Holtec outlined a plan for corporate oversight of the decommissioning projects and said "dedicated leadership" at each site would include some current employees who will remain on during the transition.

In legal briefs filed with the commission, Massachusetts officials including Attorney General Maura Healey have expressed skepticism about Holtec's plan to "decommission Pilgrim on an expedited schedule never before achieved," despite having never owned a nuclear plant nor managed a decommissioning start to finish.

Holtec executives tout "cutting edge technologies" that speed the removal of super-hot spent fuel from the reactor pool. Fuel that can no longer sustain a nuclear reaction remains radioactive and still generates substantial heat.

Under federal protocols, spent fuel rods are typically placed in pools filled with water and reinforced with concrete to prevent leakage. Used fuel generally stays in the pool for at least five years, and 10 years is the industry norm, according to the commission, allowing for enough cooling so it can be safely moved into so-called dry storage casks.

Holtec has designed a cask it says can accept spent fuel after only two years, allowing for a complete transfer from the "wet storage" pool within three years.

While there are clear risks attached to transferring spent fuel too quickly, experts also note there remains a slight risk of a catastrophic leak or fire for as long as the fuel remains in the pools.


Seven U.S. reactors have closed since 2013 and at least a dozen more could follow over the next decade, many pushed into retirement by factors such as competition from cheaper energy sources such as natural gas.

"Due to the lowering gas prices, it's a very difficult market to run a nuclear power station," said Patrick O'Brien, spokesman for Pilgrim, which got a 20-year extension to its original 40-year license but ultimately is shutting down after 47 years.

In January, privately held NorthStar Group Services completed the purchase of Vermont Yankee from New Orleans-based Entergy after federal and state regulators approved the sale of the reactor, closed since 2014. It marked the first permanent transfer of an operating license to a nuclear cleanup specialist for accelerated decommissioning. NorthStar hopes to announce another transaction soon.

"It saves a lot of money and that's what allows these projects to happen now instead of 50 years from now," said Scott State, New York City-based NorthStar's president.

There's more at stake than just demolishing the plants. Once removed from the plant itself, the spent fuel has nowhere to go and must remain indefinitely at or near the site, under 24-hour guard, because picking a permanent national nuclear waste storage site has proved too politically difficult.

NorthStar and Holtec have proposed interim waste storage facilities in Texas and New Mexico, respectively, which could allow for the centralized storage of spent fuel but which also face legal and regulatory hurdles.

As Holtec moves to become a key player in decommissioning and nuclear waste storage, it has been fending off scrutiny for its role in a mishap during decommissioning of the San Onofre nuclear plant in San Diego County last August. No radiation was released, but the NRC called the incident a "near miss" and fined plant owner Southern California Edison $116,000, according to agency documents.

Business on 05/22/2019

Print Headline: 8-year reactor cleanups raise nuke-safety worries


Sponsor Content