MUNICH, Germany -- U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper on Friday defended his decision to divert billions of dollars in funding for Navy and Air Force aircraft and other military programs to help pay for President Donald Trump's wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.
Esper was asked by a reporter about criticism from congressional Democrats and Republicans, including Rep. Mac Thornberry, a Republican from Texas, who called the diversion of funds contrary to the constitutional authority of Congress.
"Border security is national security," Esper said, "and national security is our mission."
He added, "The action we took is legal under the law, and so it should be no surprise, and I'll just leave it at that for now."
[Gallery not loading above? Click here for more photos » arkansasonline.com/215esper/]
Esper spoke on the sidelines of an international security conference in Munich.
The Pentagon announced Thursday that Esper approved shifting $3.8 billion in funds that Congress had authorized for F-35 fighter aircraft and other military programs. The money is being diverted to help the Department of Homeland Security build portions of the border wall. The Pentagon indicated that more such actions could be coming to provide additional funding for Trump's signature campaign promise.
Last year, despite congressional opposition, Trump transferred, canceled or postponed dozens of military construction projects to free up $3.6 billion.
In reaction to Thursday's Pentagon announcement, Thornberry, the top Republican on the committee and a supporter of wall construction, said although the administration's constitutional role is to recommend how tax dollars are spent, final choices are made by Congress.
"Once those choices have been made, the Department of Defense cannot change them in pursuit of their own priorities without the approval of Congress," he said. "Attempts to do so undermines the principle of civilian control of the military and is in violation of the separation of powers within the Constitution. The reprogramming announced today is contrary to Congress' constitutional authority, and I believe that it requires Congress to take action."
A Section on 02/15/2020