Today's Paper Search Latest stories Listen Drivetime Mahatma Traffic Weather Newsletters Most commented Obits Puzzles + Games Archive

Joe Biden has a problem we all want to someday have, the problem of longevity.

Biden was first elected to the Senate in 1972, the year of the Watergate break-in, and first ran for president, disastrously, back in 1988. As if to affirm that 80 is the new 70, 70 the new 60 and so on, were Biden to win the Democratic nomination he would square off at age 77 against a president who will be 74.

In 2016 we had perhaps the two most unpopular presidential nominees in our nation's history; in 2020 we could have the two oldest, with a cumulative mileage beyond a century and a half.

Biden's primary competition for the nomination at this point, at least in the premature polls, is Bernie Sanders, 14 months his senior and representative of the radical socialist wing of the Democratic Party in the same way Biden represents what's left of its center-left.

But Biden's centrism is also something of a mirage within this context because it is purely relative and a consequence of his longevity. Once a standard if somewhat-wacky liberal with foot-in-mouth disease, he now appears moderate only because his party has become so much less so over time.

The Biden who ran for president over 30 years ago, and even again in 2008, held views considered acceptably liberal at the time but now considered reactionary by Democrats deranged by Donald Trump's presidency. Even Barack Obama, perhaps the most left-leaning president in our nation's history (at least on social and cultural issues), would be considered an arch-conservative by the hair-on-fire Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar crowd.

What was mainstream then has become embarrassing for Democrats now--the Bill Clinton of "safe, legal, and rare" abortion, "don't ask, don't tell," Sister Souljah and welfare reform would likely be considered a white supremacist.

Precisely because he has an incriminating paper trail extending back nearly a half-century and is a white Christian (Catholic no less!) heterosexual male in a party that posits white Christian heterosexual males as the focus of all evil in the modern world, Biden is going to have to do (already is doing) a lot of groveling and apologizing in coming months to prove how "woke" he is.

As a general election candidate he might be the most formidable possible opponent for Trump, particularly with white working-class voters in key states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. He could promise a "reset" after the chaos of recent years, a more reassuring form of leadership after all the Trump fatigue.

Indeed, that someone once referred to as "Crazy Uncle Joe" and "Obama's impeachment insurance" could plausibly promise a "return to normalcy" in American politics tells us how abnormal American politics has become.

The only problem is, of course, the primary, and the manner in which the "centrifugal" dynamic typical of such contests is likely to be even more powerful for Democrats this time around--whoever can win the primary might be so far left as to have no chance in November, and anyone (like Biden) with a chance in November might not be far enough left to win the primary.

But this is also where the Biden-Stacey Abrams rumors come into play, suggesting a resort to an ingenious, albeit risky, gambit to satisfy the skeptical lefty grass roots.

Abrams is already something of a martyr for the radical left for having been allegedly robbed of the governorship of Georgia (a red state Democrats think has turned purple) by Republican voter suppression; a status reflected in her being chosen to give the party's response to Trump's State of the Union address.

It would, of course, be unprecedented for a presidential contender to choose a running mate 10 months out from the Iowa caucus, let alone one with no experience beyond a state legislature, but desperate times require desperate measures, and Trump himself is nothing if not unprecedented.

The claim that Abrams is unqualified to be only a "heartbeat" away from the presidency due to lack of experience loses a bit of its power when considering Trump's complete lack of public or military service prior to taking the oath of the nation's highest public office.

We now live in the age of political celebrity where an extensive political resume is more liability than asset.

Ultimately, what would matter most is that Abrams checks off all of the boxes in the identity-politics sweepstakes that Biden can't--young, black, female, and reliably woke/radical left.

The willingness of the radicals to accept such a move might also be enhanced were Biden, as some are suggesting, to promise to serve just a single term, thereby alleviating concerns over the age issue and setting up a Vice President Abrams as the 2024 Democratic front-runner.

The Bernie bros would be furious, and it would mean the end of "Betomania" and the political ambitions of Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and the rest of the occupants of the Democratic clown car, but an intriguing "deal" nonetheless: Put up with Biden in order to get rid of Trump, and then the dream far-left ticket of Abrams and AOC, just barely legally eligible (35) in October 2024.


Freelance columnist Bradley R. Gitz, who lives and teaches in Batesville, received his Ph.D. in political science from the University of Illinois.

Editorial on 04/01/2019

Print Headline: BRADLEY GITZ: The age of Biden


Sponsor Content

You must be signed in to post comments


  • mozarky2
    April 1, 2019 at 6:49 a.m.

    It is indeed a sad state of affairs for a political party when a debt-dodging, tax-evading, room-temperature IQ Stacey Abrams is considered a rising star.

  • mozarky2
    April 1, 2019 at 7:07 a.m.

    And an even sadder state of affairs when avowed communist Alexandria Ocasio-Donkey Chompers is the undisputed head of said psrty.

    April 1, 2019 at 9:40 a.m.

    I hope that girl is okay; Grandpa is going over the edge.

  • limb
    April 1, 2019 at 11:20 a.m.

    The candidates named have more smarts and talent in their little pinkies. People will vote for whoever wins Dem primary.

  • GeneralMac
    April 1, 2019 at 12:31 p.m.

    LIMB.....they didn't in 2016.

    If the economy is still great WHY would they vote for a Democrat ?

  • mozarky2
    April 1, 2019 at 2:02 p.m.

    The Great White Grope in his own words:
    “These smears and forgeries have existed in the dark recesses of the internet for a while. And to this day, right wing trolls and others continue to exploit them for their own gain.”
    Slow Joe apparently doesn't realize it's his own party who wants him out. Well, not just the party; George Soros has let the party know he'll settle for nothing less than a full-on commie as the nominee. And he OWNS the dimocrat party.

  • mozarky2
    April 1, 2019 at 2:04 p.m.

    Gitz teaches at Lyon College; perhaps the finest school in Arkansas.
    One of my grand daughter's teachers is encouraging her to apply there.

  • GeneralMac
    April 1, 2019 at 2:20 p.m.

    Lyon College ?........good southern college

    Batesville AR ?......good southern town
    .....................good southern folks

  • LRCrookAtty
    April 1, 2019 at 2:23 p.m.

    Arm..."Grandpa is going over the edge..."
    Didn't realize you had granddaughter.

  • mozarky2
    April 1, 2019 at 3:12 p.m.

    armnar is referring to my custodial grand daughter. We've had custody since she was 6mo. old. She's 9 now.
    He pities her because she gets about anything she wants, she's on the All-A Honor Roll at the toughest school in the state, she's loved by the entire staff and student body, she's never met a kid she didn't like, she takes private voice, piano, and ballet lessons, she has health care provided by my employer, and she loves her Ne-Ne and Ba-Ba very much, the poor thing.