For reasons that may not be too hard to understand, some conservatives seem to be intent on turning their K-12 schools, colleges and universities into plantations for raising a crop of ignorant and unthinking students.
Donald Trump set forth the principle during his 2016 primary campaign, when he declared, "I love the poorly educated."
In recent months, the right-wing attack on public education has intensified. The epicenter of the movement is Florida under Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, where the faculty and course offerings of one of America's leading liberal-arts colleges, New College, have been eviscerated, purportedly to wipe out what DeSantis calls "ideological indoctrination."
The state's K-12 schools have been authorized to supplement their curricula with animated cartoons developed by the far-right Prager University Foundation.
Then there's West Virginia, which is proposing to shut down nearly 10 percent of its academic offerings, including all its foreign language programs. The supposed reason is a huge budget deficit, the harvest of a systematic cutback in state funding.
In Texas, the State Library and Archives Commission is quitting the American Library Association, following a complaint by a Republican state legislator accusing the association of pushing "socialism and Marxist ideology."
In Arkansas, state education officials told schools that they may not award credit for the Advanced Placement course in African American history. (Several school districts said they'd offer students the course anyway.) This is the course that Florida forced the College Board to water down earlier this year by alleging, falsely, that it promoted "critical race theory."
I'm of two minds about this effort. On the one hand, an ignorant young electorate can't be good for the republic; on the other, filling the workforce with graduates incapable of critical thinking and weighed down by a distorted conception of the real world will reduce competition for my kids and grandkids for jobs that require knowledge and brains.
Let's examine some of these cases in greater depth.
Prager University, or PragerU, isn't an accredited institution of higher learning. It's a dispenser of right-wing charlatanism founded by Dennis Prager, a right-wing radio host. The material approved for use in the schools includes a series of five- to 10-minute animated videos featuring fictional Leo and Layla, school-age siblings who travel back in time to meet historical figures.
One encounter is with Frederick Douglass, the Black abolitionist. The goal of the video is to depict "Black lives matter" demonstrations as unrestrained and violent--"Why are they burning a car?" Leo asks while viewing a televised news report. The animated Douglass speaks up for change achieved through "patience and compromise."
This depiction of Douglass leaves experts in his life and times aghast. Douglass consistently railed against such counsel. Of the Compromise of 1850, which brought California into the union but strengthened the Fugitive Slave Act--arguably the most detested federal law in American history--he stated that it illustrated how "slavery has shot its leprous distillment through the life blood of the nation."
In 1861, he thundered that "all compromises now are but as new wine to old bottles, new cloth to old garments. To attempt them as a means of peace between freedom and slavery is as to attempt to reverse irreversible law."
The video depicts Douglass quoting from an 1852 speech to a Rochester anti-slavery society in which he said, "... great streams are not easily turned from channels, worn deep in the course of ages."
But it doesn't include lines from later in the speech, reproaching his audience for prematurely celebrating the progress of abolition: "Your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; ... all your religious parade and solemnity, ... mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy--a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages."
Another video in the series parrots the fossil fuel industry's talking points against wind and solar power. Standing over the corpse of a bird supposedly slain by flying into a wind turbine, the schoolkids' interlocutor states, "Like many people ... you've been misled about renewable energy, and their [sic] impact on the environment ... Windmills kill so many birds, it's hard to track how many ... Wind farms and solar farms disrupt huge amounts of natural habitat."
Acid rain, pollution, global warming--those consequences of fossil fuel energy aren't mentioned. The video ends with a pitch for nuclear power; never mind the unsolved question of what to do with its radioactive waste products.
As for New College, its travails under the DeSantis regime have been documented by my colleague Jenny Jarvie, among many others.
In a nutshell, the Sarasota institution possessed a well-deserved reputation as one of the nation's outstanding havens for talented independent-minded students. Then came DeSantis. He summarily replaced its board of trustees with a clutch of right-wing stooges including Christopher Rufo, known for having concocted the panic over "critical race theory" out of thin air and then marketed it as a useful culture war weapon to unscrupulous conservative politicians, like DeSantis.
Rufo and his fellows fired the university president and installed a GOP timeserver, Richard Corcoran, in her place. Faculty and students have fled. Students who stayed behind and were in the process of assembling their course schedules for the coming year are discovering at the last minute that the courses are no longer offered because their teachers have been fired or quit.
Instead of ambitious scholars committed to open inquiry, Corcoran has recruited athletes to fill out the student body, even though the college has no athletic fields for many of them to play on. According to USA Today, New College now has 70 baseball players, nearly twice as many as the University of Florida's Division I NCAA team.
More to the point, the average SAT and ACT scores and high-school grade point averages have fallen from the pre-Corcoran level, while most of the school's merit-based scholarships have gone to athletes. New College has transitioned from a top liberal arts institution into a school that places muscle-bound underachievers on a pedestal. DeSantis calls this "succeeding in its mission to eliminate indoctrination and re-focus higher education on its classical mission."
Finally, West Virginia University. Under its president Gordon Gee--who previously worked his dubious magic at Brown University and The Ohio State University, among other places--the school built lavish facilities despite declining enrollments. The construction program at the land grant university contributed to a $45-million deficit for the coming year, with expectations that it would rise to $75 million by 2028.
But the main problem was one shared by many other public universities: the erosion of public funding. As the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy points out, "if West Virginia lawmakers had simply kept higher education funding at the same levels as a decade ago, West Virginia University would have an estimated additional $37.6 million in state funding for FY 2024, closing the majority of this year's budget gap."
The decision on which programs to shutter at WVU points to a shift in how public university trustees see the purpose of their schools, trying to align them more with economic goals set by local industries rather than the goal of providing a well-rounded education to a state's students. Trustees in some states, including North Carolina and Texas, have injected themselves into academic decisions traditionally left to administrators, often for partisan political reasons.
When it comes to the interference in educational policies by conservatives, such as what's happened in Florida, Texas and Arkansas, there's no justification for taking these measures at face value--as efforts to remove "indoctrination" from the schools.
Take the attack on "critical race theory," or at least the version retailed by Rufo and his ilk. "The right has reduced CRT to an incendiary dog whistle," Black scholar Robin D.G. Kelley of UCLA has observed, by caricaturing a four-decades-long scholarly effort to analyze "why anti-discrimination law not only fails to remedy structural racism but further entrenches racial inequality" into "a racist plot to teach white children to hate themselves, their country, and their 'race.'"
(The inclusion of Kelley's work in the AP African American Studies course was cited as a "concern" by Florida officials in their rationale for rejecting the course; Kelley's work was suppressed by the College Board in its effort to make the course more acceptable to the state Department of Education.)
These attacks are couched in the vocabulary of "parents' rights" and student freedom, but they don't serve the students at all, nor do they advance the rights of parents interested in a good, comprehensive education for their children, as opposed to one dictated by the most narrow-minded ideologues in their state.
Where will it end? Ham-fisted educational policies won't produce graduates with the intellectual equipment to succeed in legitimate universities, much less in the world at large. The only university many will be qualified to attend will be Prager U, and that won't be good for anyone.