Envoy calls McChrystal friend despite his swipe

 The U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry listens to speeches during a ceremony to receive the first honorary diploma given by the National Military Academy, in Kabul, Afghanistan.
The U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry listens to speeches during a ceremony to receive the first honorary diploma given by the National Military Academy, in Kabul, Afghanistan.

— The U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan on Thursday acknowledged having “vigorous debates” with Gen. Stanley McChrystal but said he and the ousted NATO commander acted in synch to implement war strategy.

“Stan and I have known each other for a very longtime, and worked shoulder to shoulder here together under very difficult circumstances over this past year. He was an excellent partner,” Ambassador Karl Eikenberry told a group of Afghan reporters.

Eikenberry has clashed with NATO headquarters over the direction of the war. When a cable in which Eikenberry strongly questioned the wisdom of sending tens of thousands more U.S. troops to the war was leaked to the media late last year, his relationship with McChrystal became especially strained.

In a Rolling Stone magazine story that led to McChrystal’s dismissal, the commander said he felt betrayed by the leak. McChrystal accused Eikenberry of giving himself political cover in case the U.S. military buildup didn’t succeed.

“Now if we fail, they can say, ‘I told you so,’” the magazine quoted McChrystal as saying. The general later called Eikenberry to apologize.

Eikenberry, who says he has not read the article, said it was important to focus on the mission and move beyond President Barack Obama’s decision Wednesday to let McChrystal go.

“What is past is past now,” Eikenberry said. “The president made a very difficult decision. I will tell you that Stan McChrystal will always remain my friend. He’s an extremely good officer. But now here, with regards to this mission, as our president said, it’s time to move forward.”

Eikenberry pledged to work closely with Gen. David Petraeus, who was picked to succeed McChrystal.

“Our team here in Afghanistan - our civilian-military team - we pride ourselves on two things,” Eikenberry said.

“One, an environment and a climate where we sit behind closed doors and we can have those kinds of vigorous debates. We also pride ourselves, that when the door opens up, we’ve reached our decisions and we act with unity and unified effort.”

Eikenberry said that is how he would characterize his relationship with McChrystal “and that’s exactly the same kind of relationship I’d look forward to having with the new commander.”

Eikenberry said he was confident that Petraeus, who has been deeply involved in creating and implementing the Afghan strategy, would be able to take up the new post without losing momentum.

“We continue to have a very clear goal. We are going to break the Taliban’s momentum. We are going to build Afghan capacity, especially in the area of your army and your police,” Eikenberry said. He declined to comment on his relationship with President Hamid Karzai, which has appeared strained since his criticism of the leader. He did say that he met with Karzai earlier Thursday.

McChrystal has described a plan to create a “rising tide of security” in southern Taliban strongholds that would win over the civilian population, and NATO commanders have said the next few months willbe key to success.

The U.S.-led forces have struggled to stabilize the southern farming town of Marjah, the focus of a major offensive launched early this year, even as they begin a major effort with Afghan forces to ramp up security in the Taliban stronghold of Kandahar.

In Washington, Defense Secretary Robert Gates told reporters the war in Afghanistan was “slower and harder than anticipated,” but that he did not believe the U.S. was “bogged down.”

Gates said that progress was being made even if it takes longer than officials thought to help establish the local government and win over the local population.

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, said the U.S. will not know whether the strategy is working until the end of the year.

At least 80 NATO troops have died so far in June, the most in a single month. The previous record was 75 in July 2009.

Four British soldiers were killed in a vehicle accident in southern Helmand province Wednesday. All were in a police advisory team traveling to assist at an incident at a checkpoint when their armored truck had an accident near Gereshk, according to Britain’s Defense Ministry.

In Logar province, south of Kabul, four boys were killed Thursday by a roadside bomb, said Mohammad Rahim Amin, chief of Baraki Barak district. He said the children pulled on a partially buried wire that triggered the explosion.

In the south, NATO and Afghan troops destroyed a bomb factory and killed a Taliban district commander, NATO said in a statement. In all, 15 insurgents were killed in the attack, said Fazal Ahmad Sherzad, the Kandahar provincial security chief.

In northern Kunduz province, the coalition used airstrikes to kill “a number” of insurgents, NATO said, without specifying how many.

Front Section, Pages 7 on 06/25/2010

Upcoming Events