Subscribe Register Login

Tuesday, September 02, 2014, 2:46 p.m.
Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal

Mom found guilty in Facebook harassment case

By Gavin Lesnick

This article was originally published May 27, 2010 at 3:10 p.m. Updated May 27, 2010 at 4:04 p.m.

lane-new-left-talks-with-friends-and-family-while-waiting-for-a-judge-to-decide-if-his-mother-was-guilty-of-harassing-him-on-facebook

Lane New, left, talks with friends and family while waiting for a judge to decide if his mother was guilty of harassing him on Facebook.

Mom found guilty of Facebook harassment

An Arkadelphia mother was found guilty of harassing her teenage son on Facebook.

Denise New wipes her eye in a courtroom at the Clark County Courthouse in Arkadelphia on Thursday, May 27, 2010.

— An Arkadelphia mother has been found guilty of harassing her son by logging onto his Facebook account and posting messages on his profile under his username.

Clark County District Court Judge Randy L. Hill sentenced Denise New to a suspended jail term of 30 days along with a year on probation for harassing 17-year-old Lane New in March on the popular social networking site. He also ordered her to take anger management and parenting classes and not to have any contact with the teen.

Hill said he found Denise New started posting on his Facebook to "save her own hide" and make it look her son was lying when he talked to police following a physical altercation between them. He called that "a serious, serious thing to do."

But a number of other postings - including one where Denise New suggested having a child was her biggest mistake and others where she used foul language - rose to the level of harassment that was "completely and totally inappropriate," Hill said.

"It's like your worst situation being put on national TV for everyone to see," he said of the postings. "It strikes at the base of any parent-child relationship. It erodes it."

He later singled out Denise New's comment about making a mistake by becoming a mother.

"I can't in my mind go to where you must have been to say something like that," he said.

Afterward, Denise New's attorney said they have not yet decided on an appeal. She said she was left numb by the decision.

"I don't know what I can and can't say anymore," Denise New said. "It might be a form of harassment."

Lane New embraced several friends and family members after the decision and lengthy explanation by Hill, who used much of that time to admonish Denise New for her actions.

Questions posed to the teen were answered by his attorney, Travis R. Berry.

"He's just ready to start crying," Berry said. "He's so glad everybody understands what he's dealing with. He loves his mom. His relationship was bad but it wasn't his fault and he's trying. He's had a tough time and we are now glad it's over."

Lane and Denise New were the only people to take the stand during the trial.

The first message posted by Denise New on her son's Facebook occurred after she pushed the boy when he refused to return a house key. Lane New lives with his grandmother and testified that he had not lived with his mother for about six years, though he said they had been on good terms for much of that span.

In that first message, Denise New posted under her son's username as if it was him writing.

"Check this out," the message said, according to multiple accounts read in court. "I went to mom's house, deliberately started a fight and called the police on her. She almost went to jail. How cool is that?"

Denise New was able to access her son's Facebook account because it had been left logged in on the computer in her home, she said during testimony.

In voicemails left by Denise New on her son's cell phone and played during the trial, she is heard telling him she is going to log onto his account and change his password so he can no longer access it.

Prosecutors also read a message Denise New sent her son in which she references the altercation and says it wasn't her fault that he "bruises easily." She adds in that message that she is "just going to start posting cruel stuff on" Facebook in response.

"Have fun with all your little friends responding to what I posted on your wall," she is heard saying in one phone message.

Her voice shaking and frequently dabbing her eyes for tears, Denise New said in her testimony that the posts were made for multiple reasons. Some were in response to concerns over his behavior, including an episode a short time before in which Lane New was said to have driven nearly 100 mph from Hot Springs to Arkadelphia.

Other posts were intended for Denise New's own Facebook account, but she mistakenly added them to her son's because she is not that familiar with the website, she said. She claimed others were sarcastic or simply reflective of the way she communicates with her son, which she said might appear vulgar.

"But we both conversate like that with each other," Denise New said. "It's jokingly when we do that."

She and defense attorney Justin Hurst insisted there was no intention to harass the boy.

The mother and son have talked since the postings were made and Denise New said it seemed they were making progress on resolving the issue.

"I thought we were working on it and then I don't know what happened," she said through tears. "I don't know."

Hill called the postings a "breakdown in parenting."

"What we have here is, to me, a clear case of a parent of all people doing some really bad things to their child," he said. "... What you did is harassment. Nobody has the right to talk to someone like that, especially a parent."

The case has drawn wide attention largely because of its link to Facebook, though Hill said it's not the first time he has encountered involving postings on social networking sites, e-mails or text messages. Several other similar cases have come up in his courtroom over the past few years, he said.

"We live in a world now where what used to be said between two people or in a parking lot, now you hit a button and hundreds, maybe millions, of people can hear what you do," he said. "It makes it maybe even more important for a person to think before they act because the amplification can be tremendous."

Comments on: Mom found guilty in Facebook harassment case

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 total comments

debobf_artelco_com says... May 27, 2010 at 4:25 p.m.

hell. now u cant even try to teach yr kids a lesson???? why dont we just give birth and them and then turn the child over to the state to raise,,,,, perdy bad when u cant paddle yr kids now u cant yell at them with out being ordered to anger mgmnt or do something to teach them a lesson

( | suggest removal )

treksterj_yahoo_com says... May 27, 2010 at 7:11 p.m.

Remember the good old days? Before we were openly concidered property of the federal government!

( | suggest removal )

Saddle74 says... May 27, 2010 at 7:19 p.m.

I did not like this one.all she did nothing wrong.that was a comment above.it is pretty bad that you even get jailed for spanking your kids.

( | suggest removal )

Jason2010 says... May 27, 2010 at 7:27 p.m.

This isn't a case of a parent being chastised by the courts. This guy is an emancipated minor, she may be biologically his mother but she no longer has the legal rights to act in that capacity (probably for good reason, to be frank). Therefore, this is just a simple case of a person accessing another person's Facebook and posting statuses as if they were them. To be honest, she committed unlawful access and impersonation.

Oh, and treksterj, it's considered (not concidered).

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

TOP JOBS

Search 912 jobs >

Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal
Arkansas Online