Subscribe Register Login

Tuesday, September 16, 2014, 8:43 p.m.
Top Picks - Capture Arkansas

VIDEO: Supreme Court upholds reversal of adoption ban

By Gavin Lesnick

This article was originally published April 7, 2011 at 9:05 a.m. Updated April 7, 2011 at 11:09 a.m.

arkansas-family-council-president-jerry-cox-left-speaks-to-reporters-at-the-arkansas-state-capitol-in-little-rock-after-the-state-supreme-court-struck-down-an-arkansas-law-prohibiting-gay-couples-and-other-unmarried-people-who-live-together-from-adopting-or-serving-as-foster-parents

Arkansas Family Council President Jerry Cox, left, speaks to reporters at the Arkansas state Capitol in Little Rock after the state Supreme Court struck down an Arkansas law prohibiting gay couples and other unmarried people who live together from adopting or serving as foster parents.

Family Council decries Act I ruling

The president of the Family Council called the ruling upholding a ban on Act 1 the worst decision ev...

— The Arkansas Supreme Court has upheld a lower court ruling that said voter-approved adoption restrictions on unmarried couples who live together were unconstitutional.

The state's high court on Thursday released its opinion unanimously affirming a Pulaski County circuit judge's ruling last April that Initiated Act I of 2008 intrudes on privacy rights guaranteed by the Arkansas Constitution.

"The State's compelling interest, no doubt, is protection of the welfare of Arkansas's children, but we further hold that under a heightened-scrutiny analysis, which is the standard that applies to this case, the least restrictive means of serving that interest has not been employed," Associate Justice Robert L. Brown wrote in the 25-page opinion.

Proponents of Act 1 said it ensured children in state custody were placed in the safest homes while opponents argued it unfairly and illegally prohibited gay and other unmarried couples in sexual relationships from adopting.

Brown wrote that individualized assessments by the Department of Human Services and courts are effective in identifying issues with would-be adoptive parents. He said that method was the "least restrictive" and in the best interest of Arkansas's children rather than a blanket ban like Act I.

"By imposing a categorical ban on all persons who cohabit with a sexual partner, Act 1 removes the ability of the State and our courts to conduct these individualized assessments on these individuals, many of whom could qualify and be entirely suitable foster or adoptive parents," Brown wrote.

Jerry Cox of the Family Council, which worked to pass Act I, called the ruling the worst decision the Supreme Court has made and a "slap in the face" to Arkansas voters. He said his organization was considering a constitutional amendment or legislation to bring the adoption rules back into effect while noting an appeal in federal court is possible but unlikely.

"Today the Arkansas Supreme Court put the rights of adults way ahead of the welfare of children," Cox said.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which represented , issued a statement praising the court's decision.

“This ruling is a relief for the over 1,600 children in the state of Arkansas who need a permanent family," Rita Sklar, executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas said. "The state admitted good families would be banned by this law, and that we have a critical shortage of homes. This ban wouldn’t even allow a relative – gay or straight – to foster or adopt a child with whom they had a close relationship, so long as that relative was unmarried and living with a partner. The court clearly saw that this ban violated the constitutional rights of our clients and thousands of other Arkansans.”

The law approving Act I passed by 57 percent of Arkansas voters in November 2008.

Read tomorrow's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette for full details.

Thank you for coming to the Web site of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. We're working to keep you informed with the latest breaking news.

Comments on: VIDEO: Supreme Court upholds reversal of adoption ban

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 78 total comments

Jump to last page >>

WarrenGerrald says... April 7, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.

Seems to me as one of those who voted FOR the restriction that my intention was NOT to use the "least restrictive" method, but indeed to RESTRICT the adoption of children ONLY to legally married couples!

( | suggest removal )

HotSpringsLawyer says... April 7, 2011 at 9:32 a.m.

Good decision, and good for the children who need loving homes.

( | suggest removal )

80Redux says... April 7, 2011 at 9:38 a.m.

Bad decision, and bad for the children who need loving homes.

( | suggest removal )

80Redux says... April 7, 2011 at 9:39 a.m.

The headline should read "High Court Thwarts the Will of the People Again!"

( | suggest removal )

TheBatt says... April 7, 2011 at 9:40 a.m.

Remember- Arkansas Supreme Court Judges are elected....

There are no "privacy" issues. If there were, then the entire screening process for foster and adoptive parents would then have to be struck down: no background checks, no means testing, no home inspections.

This nation continues the march... One that ignores the will of the people, and places legislative powers in the hands of the judiciary (which is unconstitutional).

( | suggest removal )

MICHBEL says... April 7, 2011 at 9:41 a.m.

Children need loving homes, and that does not always or exclusively equate to male-female married couples. That also comes in the form of same-sex couples, unmarried male-female couples, and single-family homes. Great decision, and good for the children of the state of Arkansas. We took a step FORWARD today!!

( | suggest removal )

rainbowharold55 says... April 7, 2011 at 9:49 a.m.

Fantastic news- and a huge blow against the forces of bigotry like Jerry Cox and the Family Council.

( | suggest removal )

outinthesticks says... April 7, 2011 at 9:50 a.m.

Why don't we just line them up and kill them....it's the same thing we do with the unborn. You liberals want it both ways, and with the help of the courts, it looks like you'll always get your way. This country is headed for hell in a handbasket.

( | suggest removal )

ToTheLeft says... April 7, 2011 at 9:54 a.m.

Good for the children! Shame on the ones who are against the children finding homes.

( | suggest removal )

NWAConsumerReview says... April 7, 2011 at 9:54 a.m.

This is, indeed, a wise and well considered opinion. There is absolutely no evidence that "traditional" homes are any more effective in parenting than the homes of same-sex couples, unmarried male-female couples and single-family homes.

There are many children who need the homes made available in these non-traditional situations and if they can do as good or better job at parenting then why not allow them allow them to do it. There is no evidence that the future in life for these children will be any worse than from a traditional family.

( | suggest removal )

Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

TOP JOBS

  • Full time sales person

    pine bluff and hot springs areas need one fulltime sales per...
    Pine Bluff, AR

  • Lpn

    Butterfield Trail Village is now accepting applications for:...
    FAYETTEVILLE, AR

  • Maintenance techs.

    maintenance technicianneeded immediately for high volume hea...
    CONWAY, AR

  • Pipewelder/fitterlab

    pipe welder/fitterlaboreropenings Available-Industrial Refri...
    RUSSELLVILLE, AR

  • Account executive sales and marketing

    account executive sales and marketing The Arkansas Democrat-...
    Little Rock, AR

Search 872 jobs >

Top Picks - Capture Arkansas
Arkansas Online