Subscribe Register Login

Wednesday, October 01, 2014, 7:38 a.m.
Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal

Zero Dark Thirty’s hunt for Osama bin Laden has an air of authenticity

By Philip Martin

This article was published January 11, 2013 at 2:14 a.m.

members-of-navy-seal-team-six-brothers-nash-and-joel-edgerton-prepare-for-a-raid-on-the-suspected-compound-of-osama-bin-laden-in-kathryn-bigelows-zero-dark-thirty

Members of Navy Seal Team Six (brothers Nash and Joel Edgerton) prepare for a raid on the suspected compound of Osama bin Laden in Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty.

— Some people, including three U.S. senators and the estimable cultural critic Naomi Wolf, have raised some interesting questions about the morality of Zero Dark Thirty, Kathryn Bigelow’s somber and surgical movie about the decade-long hunt for Osama bin Laden conducted by American military and intelligence forces in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Wolf - in her Jan. 4 column in the British newspaper The Guardian - called Bigelow’s movie an “apology for torture,” and equated Bigelow to Nazi propagandist Leni Riefenstahl.

“Like Riefenstahl, you are a great artist,” Wolf wrote, “but now you will be remembered forever as torture’s handmaiden.”

Now I have seen Zero Dark Thirty, and I have studied (and taught) Riefenstahl’s work. Bigelow has always been a director drawn to what she has called “seductive violence” - her early films Blue Steel and Point Break exposed a very American fascination with the tools and techniques of hurting human beings.

She understands that present in our hearts are triggers that might be tugged by beautiful horror. People are susceptible to believing what we see and confusing (and conflating) Eros and Thanatos, but do we hold the artist liable for the misapprehensions of the audience?

I wouldn’t prohibit Bigelow - or anyone - from addressing hard subjects simply because her movie might be misread by intellectually lazy and morally malleable jingoists.

So while some might argue that Zero Dark Thirty tells a story that needn’t be told and others might doubt the official version that informs its plot (there are those who disbelieve bin Laden had anything to do with 9/11 and others who disbelieve whatever governments tell them), it would seem disingenuous to produce a movie about these events that didn’t acknowledge the harshness of our tactics. That would be bad journalism, and though Zero Dark Thirty is a work of fiction, it is presented as a deeply researched and emotionally honest work.

We are responsible for making judgments about an artist’s motives, and about how genuine or false a purportedly true story rings. Of course Zero Dark Thirty could be dismissed as propaganda by an ideologue, but it seems to me the only serious question to be asked about the movie is “Is it honest?”

As entertainment, Zero Dark Thirty is a great accomplishment - a somber, black-winged benediction for what we might count as a lost decade. Even though we know how it ends, we are enthralled by the way the story is spooled out. Though the movie is nearly three hours long, Bigelow has an uncanny sense of pacing and rhythm, which is never more evident than in the film’s most audacious set-piece, an almost unbearably tense, moment by-moment re-creation of the raid on bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

But Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal are careful not to exploit the cathartic potential of the raid, and the movie ends on a note that’s dissonant with the expectations of an action movie crowd. It ends where it begins, with the enigmatic Maya (Jessica Chastain), a young woman recruited into the CIA specifically to ferret out the architect of the 9/11 attacks. (The filmmakers have said the character is based on a real person, whose name was changed for security reasons.)

We learn nothing of her personal life, except perhaps that she hasn’t one, and we pick up most of the details of the story through in situ conversations with colleagues and interrogations of detainees. We understand that she has a theory that the way to get bin Laden is to first find the courier who connects him to his network.

Chastain’s Maya is an alert and sensitive being, one who questions the orders she’s obliged to follow. She flinches at the torture in a way Bigelow’s camera does not, but she does what she believes she must. She argues and cajoles and pouts when she feels her opinions are not accorded sufficient weight. We learn things about her through the remarks of others - “Washington says she’s a killer,” we overhear early on, before she has demonstrated anything other than a tentative mousiness.

It should be said that the cast is uniformly fine, although it’s difficult to find a genuine co-star among the players. Jason Clarke (Lawless) and Jennifer Ehle (The King’s Speech) manage the trick of seeming simultaneously ordinary and possessed of a particular set of skills. Other familiar faces pop up for a moment or two - Kyle Chandler, Harold Perrineau, Joel Edgerton, Chris Pratt - but the film belongs to the deeply complicated and ultimately unparseable Maya.

And, so, to answer the question: To me, Zero Dark Thirty feels authentic, based on what I think I know about how certain systems (the military-industrial complex, Hollywood, high school cliques) operate.

In my judgment, it is not an apology for torture. I did not come away from the film believing in water boarding as an effective means of intelligence gathering, but then I went into the film with a certain set of prejudices - if anything, I think the film’s depictions of torture seem likely to make tangible the rough realities of retail war-making. I credit the film for exposing the gears of the machine, for telling something like the truth about how operatives operate. I am sure many people have done bad things in pursuit of noble goals.

I do not equate representation with endorsement, and I think that is a stupid thing to do.

Better to show us what is done in our name than to fade to black.

Zero Dark Thirty 92

Cast: Jessica Chastain, Jason Clarke, Jennifer Ehle, James Gandolfini, Kyle Chandler, Chris Pratt

Director: Kathryn Bigelow

Rating: R, for strong violence including brutal disturbing images, and for language

Running time: 157 minutes

MovieStyle, Pages 31 on 01/11/2013

Print Headline: Intelligence coup/Zero Dark Thirty’s hunt for Osama bin Laden has an air of authenticity

Comments on: Zero Dark Thirty’s hunt for Osama bin Laden has an air of authenticity

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 total comments

Jackabbott says... January 11, 2013 at 8:28 a.m.

This is another garbage movie coming out of Hollywood. The Obama team tried to help it along but it backfired. The movie should be pulled from theaters, a lot of the people with knowledge of the event say this is a souped-up lie.
Once agan Hollywood and the NRA have hooked up to serve up gratious violence for a buck.

( | suggest removal )

DontDrinkDatKoolAid says... January 11, 2013 at 8:44 a.m.

And what did the NRA have to do with the move?

( | suggest removal )

cliffcarson says... January 11, 2013 at 9:34 a.m.

I have not seen the movie. I will sooner or later. I am a movie fan and keep a list of my idea of the top ten movies ever. The list is over 350 movies long. The truth does not have to be reflected in all movies but if it is sold as a true rendition of the facts, then it ought to be that.
Leni Riefenstahl was branded as a Nazi Propagandist because of what the Nazi Regime became. I believe that her earlier films were hailed by the World including Hollywood. And in "Triumph of the Will" I didn't see warmongering, torture, or a surrender of the individual rights promoted. What I saw was a call for the German people to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and once again become a world leading nation. Phillip weren't the soldiers in that film depicted as an army of men carrying gardening equipment as opposed to water boarding, renditions, and all manner of malfeasance?
What I have heard Zero Dark Thirty depicts is that torture is just fine. A good film to see before or after Zero Dark Thirty might be " Taxi to the Darkside" - a documentary about real torture and interviews with some of the soldiers who actually perform the beating to death of a detainee over a period of two weeks until he died of his injuries. Phillip if you haven't read "Those who walk away from Omelas" be sure and do so. That fictional work is a short story about how a utopian society has built its very existence on depravity. Read it, you will be glad you did.

I will form my opinion of Zero Dark Thirty after I see it.

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

TOP JOBS

  • Clinical supervisor

    clinical supervisor for a residential behavioral health prog...
    HOT SPRINGS NATIONAL PARK, AR

  • Sales

    pine bluff, batesville, hot springs areas need one fulltime ...
    Pine Bluff, AR

  • Occupational therapy

    occupational therapist: Lonoke area. Looking for an opportun...
    LONOKE, AR

  • Finish heavy equipme

    Redstone Construction Group has the following positions avai...
    LITTLE ROCK, AR

  • Outside sales representatives

    Needed! - 25 Hour Work Week - 3:00pm to 8:00pm Monday-Frida...
    Little Rock, AR

Search 944 jobs >

Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal
Arkansas Online