Sugars, calories pop out in food-label proposal

First lady Michelle Obama gestures as she speaks in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 27, 2014, about helping parents and other consumers make healthier choices as part of her Let's Move program. The Obama administration is proposing new food labels that would make it easier to know about calories and added sugars, a reflection of the shifting science behind nutrition.  (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
First lady Michelle Obama gestures as she speaks in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 27, 2014, about helping parents and other consumers make healthier choices as part of her Let's Move program. The Obama administration is proposing new food labels that would make it easier to know about calories and added sugars, a reflection of the shifting science behind nutrition. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Calorie counts in bold type and the added sugars in a product will be part of new food labels proposed to help U.S. consumers become healthier eaters.

The labels also will provide new serving sizes, such as 1 cup instead of a half-cup for ice cream, that more accurately reflect the way people eat, according to the proposed rules released Thursday by the Food and Drug Administration. While the food industry introduced a voluntary front-of-package labeling system in 2011, the new rules would be the first required changes to the labels in more than 20 years.

The government is largely playing catch-up as the nation’s eating habits, food trends and advancements in obesity research have evolved since 1993, when labels bearing basic calorie counts and fat grams became standard. The changes are meant to help curtail widespread obesity and prevent chronic illnesses such as heart disease and diabetes.

“Nobody claims that information all by itself will solve the obesity problem,” Michael Taylor, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine, said Thursday on a conference call with reporters. “There is research that lots of people use this label. The label itself influences choices for the better.”

The FDA’s draft guidance on the labels will be open to public comment for 90 days.The final rules are expected in the next year and companies then will have two years to update their packaging. The changes are expected to cost $2 billion, though the government estimates that they may generate health benefits of $20 billion to $30 billion to consumers over 20 years.

“It is critical that any changes are based on the most current and reliable science,” Pamela Bailey, chief executive officer of the Grocery Manufacturer’s Association, said in a statement. “Equally as important is ensuring that any changes ultimately serve to inform, and not confuse, consumers.”

The FDA has been talking with the food industry about revising the labels for about a decade, Taylor said.

About 78 million adults, or about one-third of the U.S. population, are obese as are 17 percent of children and teenagers younger than 19.

First lady Michelle Obama has focused attention on childhood obesity since her husband entered the White House, urging families to eat more-nutritious foods and exercise more. The obesity rate for 2- to 5-year-olds fell almost by half to 14 percent in 2011-2012 from a decade earlier, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a report this week.

“Our guiding principle here is very simple: that you as a parent and a consumer should be able to walk into your local grocery store, pick up an item off the shelf, and be able to tell whether it’s good for your family,” the first lady said.

The new labels are another step in the effort by federal officials to help people improve their diets. Information about added sugars is a new requirement. Research over the past decade has shown that added sugars should be avoided: People who eat them are more likely to ingest less nutrient-rich food and consume more calories.

The FDA proposal also reduces the daily recommendation on sodium to 2,300 milligrams from 2,400, which the Center for Science in the Public Interest said isn’t enough. The daily value should be reduced to 1,500 milligrams, the nonprofit advocacy group said, to reduce the number of deaths from heart attacks and strokes.

The new labels will display the number of servings per container in bold type, and calories in a larger, bold font.

Vitamin D and potassium will replace vitamin C and vitamin A as nutrients. FDA officials said Americans don’t get enough of either nutrient with vitamin D aiding bone health and potassium helping reduce blood pressure. Also, the recommended daily amounts of dietary fiber and vitamin D have changed.

Calories from fat will be removed from the label, though total fat, saturated fat and trans fat still must be listed. Studies have shown that the type of fat consumed matters more than the amount.

FDA officials offered a few examples of the serving size changes being proposed. A single serving of soda will increase to 12 ounces from 8 ounces so people are better-informed about how many calories they’re drinking.

Also, any packaged food ordinarily consumed in one sitting, such as a 20-ounce bottle of soda, will be declared one serving. Anything larger that may be consumed in one or more sittings will be labeled explaining nutrition both per serving and per package.

“There might be some awkwardness in serving size,” said Jim Marks, senior vice president at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. “The recommendations would have a 12-ounce soft drink as a single serving, and a 20-ounce soft drink also as a single serving, so with a 2-liter bottle, how many servings is that?”

The proposed nutritional labels affect all packaged foods except meat, poultry and processed egg products, which are regulated by the Department of Agriculture rather than the FDA.

Front Section, Pages 4 on 02/28/2014

Upcoming Events