Subscribe Register Login
Thursday, November 23, 2017, 12:47 p.m.

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal

Editorial

Horrors! A vacancy on the court!

Nine is not a magic number

This article was published March 2, 2016 at 3:00 a.m.

There the president goes again, warning that if his nomination to the Supreme Court isn't considered by the Senate, the whole constitutional process will be disrupted, politics will be introduced into appointments to the high court and its decisions, and the sky will fall.

This story is only available from the Arkansas Online archives. Stories can be purchased individually for $2.95. Click here to search for this story in the archives.

Print Headline: Horrors! A vacancy on the court!

ADVERTISEMENT

Comments on: Horrors! A vacancy on the court!

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 21 - 27 of 27 total comments

JakeTidmore says... March 2, 2016 at 5:19 p.m.

Packie proves once again that, at heart, he is a maker of balloon animals. He takes various colored balloons, blows them up with his hot air, and then twists them into semi-recognizable shapes.
Great entertainment for kiddies. Not so for adults.

( | suggest removal )

Dontsufferfools says... March 2, 2016 at 9:17 p.m.

Be interesting to see that if Trump gets the nomination and then looks dead in the polls late in the summer, if Senate Republicans will suggest Obama nominate a moderate court candidate, thinking that it will be a better option for them than having Hillary nominate more liberal candidate. To follow up on birddog's excellent comments, the Constitution only says there has to be a supreme court. It doesn't say there has to be 9 justices. The number could be set at one. And if we can go a year without a justice, then we can go four too, I would think.

( | suggest removal )

Packman says... March 2, 2016 at 10:03 p.m.

Hey Whodo - Go back and read. I specifically said it was wrong not to have Obama offer a nominee and the Senate then consider. My point was to illustrate the hypocrisy of the double standard by those on the left. The editorials here are simply wrong.
.
Hey Jake - When all you have to offer is childish ad hominem attacks, you indicate a losing argument. Point, game, set, match, I win, again.

( | suggest removal )

dearlo says... March 2, 2016 at 11:23 p.m.

9 is the law of the land. Don't we ALL HAVE to follow the law or is it just most people? Or do the few not have to abide? No more of these games and lies, people are tired of it.

( | suggest removal )

WhododueDiligence says... March 3, 2016 at 9:22 a.m.

Packman, your accusation of hypocrisy is based on two false assumptions--that your opponents believe Biden's 1992 opinion (which was cherry-picked while ignoring other portions of his speech) was correct and, going even farther down that road, that your opponents believe Biden's opinion somehow becomes a Biden Rule.
This line of thinking is also a straw man argument in which you misrepresent what your opponents believe and then attack that dubious and flimsy construct.

( | suggest removal )

WhododueDiligence says... March 3, 2016 at 9:43 a.m.

Packman, other than the accusations, you and I agree on this issue. Your initial comment about the proper thing for Obama and the Senate to do is spot-on correct.

( | suggest removal )

Packman says... March 3, 2016 at 10:39 a.m.

Hey Whodo - I made no assumption that Biden's opinion was correct. I only pointed out what the guy said. The "Biden Rule" is nothing more than a clever phrase to illustrate the prima facie double standard on behalf of the left. As I said, you could just as easily call it the Shumer Rule or the Obama Rule. And again, it's not a straw man argument because the only thing represented was/is the literal meaning of Biden's words. It's that literal meaning that was "attacked", not any construct thereof. If you get a chance you should also see what Obama said while filibustering Alito. The double standard is strong with that one.

( | suggest removal )

Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

ADVERTISEMENT

SHOPPING

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Picks - Arkansas Daily Deal
Arkansas Online