Lockups work to prevent rapes

Crowding, costs hinder compliance with federal guidelines

Miguel Moll says the threat of rape led to the first of many fights he was involved in while behind bars for joyriding in a stolen car when he was 17. “The mentality you have to develop very quickly is either that of a wolf or that of a lamb,” he said.
Miguel Moll says the threat of rape led to the first of many fights he was involved in while behind bars for joyriding in a stolen car when he was 17. “The mentality you have to develop very quickly is either that of a wolf or that of a lamb,” he said.

HOUSTON -- Miguel Moll knew the risk of rape when he was thrown into a Texas jail as a teenager in 1989.

A generation later, the federal government has adopted guidelines intended to prevent prison rape, in part by separating young offenders from adult inmates. But four years after the rules were supposed to take effect, they are proving difficult to adopt in the nation's crowded jails and penitentiaries.

Since 2012, states have been working to meet the standards set forth by the Prison Rape Elimination Act, which was partially inspired by the 1996 death of Rodney Hulin, an undersized 17-year-old inmate who hanged himself in Texas after his requests for help after repeated rapes by adult inmates were denied.

The nation's more than 7,600 prisons, jails, community-based facilities and juvenile detention centers are being checked on their compliance with the law. So far, only 12 states are in full compliance, according to the Justice Department. Thirty-six other states say they are working to comply. As of July, Arkansas and Utah are the only states that have neither submitted a certification nor an assurance of compliance, according to the Justice Department.

The law was also supposed to provide for better staff training, improved reporting and investigation of all sexual assaults behind bars, and more money for research. But Texas sheriff's offices say separating the two populations has been a challenge because of overcrowding and steep financial costs.

"It's a big logistical headache," Brazos County Sheriff Chris Kirk said.

Moll was 17 when he was placed in a holding pen in Houston after joyriding in a stolen car. An older inmate said of the teenager, "I got this one."

The comment sparked the first of many fights Moll had while behind bars.

"The mentality you have to develop very quickly is either that of a wolf or that of a lamb," he recalled.

In 2011-12, an estimated 4 percent of state and federal inmates and 3.2 percent of jail inmates reported experiencing sexual victimization one or more times by another inmate or by facility staff, according to the Justice Department.

The rape-prevention law "is a valuable and important act, and we take it very seriously," said Ryan Sullivan, a spokesman for the Harris County sheriff's office, which has about 150 youth offenders at its jail in Houston. The facility holds more than 9,000 inmates.

The Harris County jail was cited in a May audit for not housing 17-year-old offenders apart from adult inmates. Elsewhere in Texas, Dallas County is spending more than $11,000 per week to keep at least 60 juveniles separate from adults at its jail complex.

Like Moll, Art Medina was incarcerated at 17 in Texas. He was later sentenced to life in prison in 1985 for his role in a fatal Houston-area carjacking and spent 15 years in solitary confinement after seriously wounding an inmate who threatened to rape him. He was paroled after serving 26 years.

Now in their 40s, both men have returned to the prison system as volunteers to help adopt the Prison Rape Elimination Act standards. Medina said that in the past, inmates felt like "nobody cares about them."

"That culture has changed. People are being held accountable," he said.

The age separation has been especially complicated in states such as Texas that prosecute 17-year-olds as adults. Advocates say some facilities still question whether the federal mandate applies to them.

In many jurisdictions, one of the biggest barriers is summoning the political will to make changes, said Brenda Smith, who was a member of the National Prison Rape Elimination Commission, which helped develop the standards.

States that do not comply face losing 5 percent of their federal prison grants. County jails and local lockups are usually not included in the determination of whether a state is in compliance. Locally run facilities have no risk of losing federal money unless that funding is directly tied to a state contract for jail services.

Smith, a law professor at American University in Washington, D.C., said that means local authorities can only be held accountable by public criticism or lawsuits.

In Michigan, the prison system faces federal and state lawsuits filed by prisoners who allege that officials failed to adequately separate offenders ages 14 to 17 from adults, resulting in sexual assaults.

A Wisconsin legislative report concluded in July that the state's prison system was not splitting up the age groups. And an American Civil Liberties Union survey in North Carolina in 2014 found that none of the 60-plus county jails that responded appeared to be in complete compliance.

Those findings have renewed calls for the states that prosecute 17-year-olds as adults to raise their age of adult criminal responsibility to 18. Those states include Texas, Michigan and North Carolina, as well as Arkansas. Sullivan, Kirk and other Texas jail officials say they would be in favor of raising the age.

Efforts to raise the age failed in the latest legislative session in Texas, but advocates plan to try again next year, said Elizabeth Henneke, policy attorney with the Texas Criminal Justice Coalition.

A Section on 09/12/2016

Upcoming Events