Subscribe Register Login

Monday, May 22, 2017, 2:35 p.m.


Top Picks - Capture Arkansas


JOHN BRUMMETT: The rush to outrage

By John Brummett

This article was published May 18, 2017 at 4:30 a.m.

Donald Trump is surely the right president for the digital era.

A print columnist, by being read tomorrow on what he writes today, will routinely stay a couple of scandals or outrages behind.

Here was the situation Tuesday afternoon: The operative scandal, as reported by the Washington Post, was that Trump, during a meeting with the Russian foreign minister and ambassador, had revealed previously classified information about our nation's knowledge of an ISIS scheme based on laptops on airplanes.

The piece revealed Trump as reckless, uninformed, unstudied, ego-maniacal, destructive and childish. But it did not appear to present an impeachable offense.

But here was the situation a couple of hours later: The New York Times was reporting that ousted FBI director James Comey had written a contemporaneous note in February about a private meeting he'd just had with Trump at Trump's behest in which Trump asked that the bureau drop an investigation of the alleged Russian ties of just-resigned national security adviser Mike Flynn.

Two things about the Times piece: It seemed not quite ripe for publication. The reporter had not actually seen Comey's memo. He reported merely having had a portion of it read to him over the telephone by a friend of Comey assuring him of its authenticity.

That doesn't seem good enough to bring down a president, which is what the allegation, if borne out, should do.

That's because the second thing about the Times piece is that it describes a president attempting to obstruct justice--a crime--by prevailing on an FBI director whom he would fire three months later when the investigation he wanted abandoned was proceeding apace.

The Times editors explained that the reporter's source was known to the editors and trusted to the point of comfort in the memo's authenticity.

I don't doubt that. But I think rushing to publication is a fact of life of our new digital frontier in news. It also perhaps reflects an abiding interest by the Times in trumping--forgive the word--the Post scoop about the Russian meeting.

Insufficiently locked down or not, the Times piece will set off a series of events that will lock it down inevitably. Even a Republican, House Oversight Committee Chairman Jacob Chaffetz, said that, based on the article, he would subpoena from the FBI all of Comey's relevant correspondence.

Surely now even Republicans will step up the seriousness and independence of investigations of the full array of Trump-Russia allegations.

Or maybe not.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, speaking from inside Trump's hip pocket, said he wanted to get to the bottom of it. But by "it," he meant why Comey, if criminally accosted by the president in February, didn't tell somebody at the time.

For the record, it is common for official FBI personnel, when having an interaction relevant to an investigation on which they're working, to make a written record of that communication for possible use later should a need arise. And it is common for such memoranda to be accepted as admissible evidence in court.

Oh, and one other thing: Comey's memo also said--reportedly--that Trump told him he wished the FBI would bring charges against reporters revealing secrets from unidentified sources.

In a saner pre-Trump word, that would have been the lead item, not the postscript.

Meantime, don't forget the old scandal, the one from two days before on Trump's indiscreet motor-mouthing in a meeting with the Russians.

There are three views of that and the first two are wrong.

The partisan left-wing view is that this incident is plain treason and certain proof that Trump is a Russian puppet and should be impeached forthwith.

What's wrong with that view is that there is no evidence to support it--and, by the way, the president can instantly de-classify classified information. His revealing it de-classifies it. There arises, therefore, no high crime or misdemeanor.

The partisan right-wing view is that, OK, maybe Trump said too much because, after all, he's new to public office and still naïve on some of those esoteric things. But his intentions, which were to ally with the Russians in fighting terrorism, were fine. Anyway, the crime is not the president's, but the leakers'.

The first problem with that is that sharing interests with Russia doesn't invite sharing secrets. Those rascals are not our friends. The second problem is that the supposed offense of leaking doesn't excuse the substance leaked. Conservatives loved the WikiLeaks revelations on Hillary Clinton.

The in-between and correct view is that Trump is ... let's just say he is so beset by an affliction--probably megalomania and a diagnosable narcissistic personality disorder--that he behaves chronically in ways that are ego-needy and reckless.

Maureen Dowd once famously wrote that Bill Clinton's actions weren't grounds for impeachment, but divorce.

Likewise, Trump's actions--in the Russian conversation outrage--aren't grounds for impeachment, but professional help.


John Brummett, whose column appears regularly in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, was inducted into the Arkansas Writers' Hall of Fame in 2014. Email him at Read his @johnbrummett Twitter feed.

Editorial on 05/18/2017

Print Headline: The rush to outrage


Comments on: JOHN BRUMMETT: The rush to outrage

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 13 total comments

Jump to last page >>

Jfish says... May 18, 2017 at 8:42 a.m.

Excellent column John

( | suggest removal )

davidscherreysbcglobalnet says... May 18, 2017 at 8:48 a.m.

From Washington Post, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein threatened to resign. Not True a Lie. Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian diplomats in their Oval Office meeting. A LIE.

The new health care bill does not treat rape as a pre-existing condition. No, the new health care bill does not treat rape as a pre-existing condition and Republicans did not celebrate its passage with beer. A LIE.

Comey memo story. The supposed memo contradicts Comey’s own testimony to Congress under oath.

CNN got its fake news fingers burned with a story claiming that the former FBI Director had asked for more resources for the Russia investigation before he was fired. Where did CNN get its story from? Anonymous sources!!
McCabe testified that he believed the bureau had adequate resources to complete the job. A LIE.
Presidents and diplomats have share secrets with other countries since country was founded.

Getting your news from the Washington Post is as worthless as getting it from Saturday Night Live.
Free Press. Maybe a Fake Press?
We did learn one thing today Brummett is a psychiatrist or needs one.

( | suggest removal )

Packman says... May 18, 2017 at 10:56 a.m.

Even John Brummett's beginning to grasp the significance of unhinged journalists still angry that Hillary lost attempting to sabotage President Trump with irresponsible "news" stories. The "scandals" are manufactured and as real as unicorns and Big Foot.

( | suggest removal )

mozarky2 says... May 18, 2017 at 11:25 a.m.

And the left never seems to tire of falling on their asses like Charlie Brown kicking from Lucy's hold. They never get that Trump is always several steps ahead of them.

( | suggest removal )

Jfish says... May 18, 2017 at 12:07 p.m.

david, you might want to read the column again, seems to me it is pretty much down the middle. I agree with you about some of the fake news and hit jobs, however, if Trump tries to portray Comey as a liar, he will lose that argument in a landslide.

( | suggest removal )

LR1955 says... May 18, 2017 at 12:38 p.m.

WP & NYT, full of embellished fake news!

( | suggest removal )

davidscherreysbcglobalnet says... May 18, 2017 at 12:51 p.m.

Jfish: I agree with you. And I was just having a little humor with Brummett, he knows it.

May 3 Comey "But I’m talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason, that would be a very big deal. It’s not happened in my experience.”
Senator Burr noted that he met with Comey the day before Trump fired him. “The director of the FBI shared more information with Sen. Warner and myself than any director has ever shared,” he said. “I think something as material as that probably would have been something he would have shared, had it happened,” he said.

( | suggest removal )

TimberTopper says... May 18, 2017 at 1:58 p.m.

John, you've done it again. The haters BP's are soaring, foam dripping from their mouths, hands shaking until they can hardly feed themselves, and certainly they are unable to practice self control, and all are passing gas and doing their best to hold their water. Some must have received messages in unknown tongues and used them for their own personal comment. Yep, my hat is off to you! I still think you could have one hell of a TV Show with all this manure they broadcast, or one hell of a garden. Continue your good work! Man and Woman Kind are depending on those professionals like yourself to state the facts and you have and are doing it well. Thanks!

( | suggest removal )

Packman says... May 18, 2017 at 4:19 p.m.

Hey JB - I think TimberTopper wants to have your babies. If I were you, I would be exploring a restraining order.

( | suggest removal )

carpenterretired says... May 18, 2017 at 7:05 p.m.

The joke as always is on the the boys in the turnip truck as Trump is their guy ,how ever in time so much Trump slime will fall on the boys they may have to trade the old flat bed for a tank truck.

( | suggest removal )

Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.





Top Picks - Capture Arkansas
Arkansas Online