Subscribe Register Login
Monday, November 20, 2017, 2:08 a.m.

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Picks - Mobile App

U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton bill seeks care-mandate exemptions

By Frank E. Lockwood

This article was published October 18, 2017 at 4:30 a.m.

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., is shown on Capitol Hill in this file photo.

U.S. Sens. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania on Tuesday introduced legislation that would exempt some lower-income Americans from a tax that is assessed on people who forgo health insurance.

This story is only available from the Arkansas Online archives. Stories can be purchased individually for $2.95. Click here to search for this story in the archives.

Print Headline: Cotton bill seeks care-mandate exemptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Comments on: U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton bill seeks care-mandate exemptions

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

Subscribe Register Login

You must login to make comments.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 total comments

TimberTopper says... October 18, 2017 at 4:48 a.m.

Is there something in the water he's drinking that's causing these loss of ability to think? This was put in to encourage people to sign up for the ACA, if they didn't have health insurance. It also was there to expand the risk pool so that premiums would be lower. O Well he has government insurance, for himself and his family, he can't be bothered by what average "Joe Arkansas" needs, because Joe isn't as important as Tommy.

( | suggest removal )

RBear says... October 18, 2017 at 6:16 a.m.

So we're now going to pay people to forego the individual mandate instead of helping them pay for coverage? What stupidity is this? Sometimes Republicans trip over their insanity trying to look intelligent. This is one of those cases.

( | suggest removal )

23cal says... October 18, 2017 at 7:06 a.m.

With no insurance, who pays when they get the medical care that just about everybody needs at some time or another? If they are the ones for whom Cottonmouth is doing this---people making less than $50,000 per year----and they can't afford insurance, how can they afford a $100,000 or $500,000 medical bill? What happens then?
*
I'll tell you what happens then: they stiff the hospital and declare bankruptcy, that gets folded into the cost of medical care, and the people who DO responsibly buy insurance pay higher rates to cover it.
*
Republicans are supposed to be the party of personal responsibility. Where is the personal responsibility of not insuring your own health?

( | suggest removal )

dmzlawyer03090825 says... October 18, 2017 at 1:32 p.m.

I may not understand this proposed Bill. If you are going to excuse a portion of the population from having to purchase insurance, then if such a person who has no insurance who pays for his or her health issues? The hospital provides free service, the doctors, the consumers who have health insurance? This appears to be regressing back to pre-mandatory days when treatment was generally free if were so poor because treatment was received at the ER. Please explain. Dennis Z

( | suggest removal )

rubythecat96gmailcom says... October 18, 2017 at 2:11 p.m.

wonderful ! hope it passes my home health aid makes well below the $59,000.00 median income and can not afford the insurance or the penalties. the creation of Obamacare caused her to switch her life long democrat party affiliation from democrat to republican in the hope that the congress and senate can finally get rid of it. they had better get on with it.

( | suggest removal )

mhck52 says... October 18, 2017 at 3:16 p.m.

The Supreme Court ruled the government can not mandate the purchase of health insurance; or anything else for that matter. If the government can't mandate you buy a product how can you be taxed for not buying a product?

( | suggest removal )

RBear says... October 18, 2017 at 6:15 p.m.

mhck, what are you talking about? In National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, ruled that the Supreme Court found the mandate constitutional as well as the tax associated. Cite your sources for it being unconstitutional.

( | suggest removal )

WGT says... October 18, 2017 at 6:19 p.m.

Republicans having control of the senate, house, and presidency, still cannot get anything accomplished. Why would one begin to think this will be a good idea? Vote.
.
Vote,vote,vote. We must show these hopeless people how real Americans help others.

( | suggest removal )

carpenterretired says... October 18, 2017 at 9:12 p.m.

Well ranger Tom has failed and failed to take health care away from 400,000 lower income working ,sick, poor ,least among us Arkansans by repealing the ACA , so he is now taking a shot at sabotaging the ACA to do unto those Arkansans with the evil in his heart , behold a hypocrite of biblical proportions . Wonder if the turnip truck guy is mooching(off the taxpayers) the home health care aid from a government program?

( | suggest removal )

mozarky2 says... October 19, 2017 at 5:58 a.m.

Ever occur to you "progs" to vote Cotton out? I mean, he only won that seat by a margin of 56.5% to Mark Pryor's 39.4%-LOL!
The economy is booming, unemployment is at record lows, the stock market is at record highs, Obama's beloved ISIS has been defeated, and you "progs" are telling us "Oh, noes! Things have never been worse"!
You people don't have a hope in hell, do you?
Freudenschade, baby! Thanks for putting a spring in my step today!

( | suggest removal )

  • page
  • 1
Click here to make a comment

To report abuse or misuse of this area please hit the "Suggest Removal" link in the comment to alert our online managers. Read our Terms of Use policy.

ADVERTISEMENT

SHOPPING

loading...

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Picks - Mobile App
Arkansas Online