OPINION — Editorial

Others say: Insurance must adjust

Many people like living near beaches for obvious reasons. But as with most good things in life, there are trade-offs. For owning a house by the ocean, perhaps the biggest one is the risk of a home-erasing squall.

But thanks to federal flood insurance, that possibility never weighs as heavily as it should in the minds of those looking to move to or build along the coasts. Common sense tells us that far fewer people would choose to invest in flood-prone areas if the financial risk lay with only them. Thus in the decades since the legislation's passage in 1968, the National Flood Insurance Program has driven coastal housing development in the United States well beyond its market rate of growth. And only recently have the dire consequences of the government's intervention emerged.

Climate change has permanently altered the math of flood insurance. But there has been no adjustment. The government still underwrites unreasonable risk and you still pay.

We need to put the risk of building in floodplains on the backs of builders and buyers and take it off the backs of the taxpayers.

Editorial on 09/20/2017

Upcoming Events