WASHINGTON -- Adult film actress Stormy Daniels' attorney filed a motion Wednesday that seeks to have President Donald Trump answer questions under oath about a pre-election payment aimed at keeping Daniels quiet about their alleged tryst.
If successful, it would be the first deposition of a sitting president since Bill Clinton in 1998 had to answer questions about his conduct with women.
Daniels' attorney, Michael Avenatti, is seeking sworn testimony from Trump and his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, about a $130,000 payment made to Daniels days before the 2016 presidential election as part of a nondisclosure agreement she is seeking to invalidate.
Avenatti filed the motion in U.S. District Court in California.
Trump has kept a low profile all week, as has first lady Melania Trump, who is spending the week in Florida. White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Trump had denied the allegations and directed further questions to outside counsel.
Cohen's attorney, David Schwartz, told CBS that the filing was a "reckless use of the legal system."
Despite the pushback, the persistent focus on Daniels is a distraction for a White House already struggling with an exodus of top staff members, a floundering agenda and the looming threat from the Russia investigation.
Avenatti is just one of a growing list of lawyers looking to question Trump. Attorneys for a former Apprentice contestant have said they want to depose the president as part of a defamation suit. And the president's legal team continues to negotiate with special counsel Robert Mueller over the scope and terms of an interview with the president.
[PRESIDENT TRUMP: Timeline, appointments, executive orders + guide to actions in first year]
A hard-charging attorney maintaining a near-constant presence on television news, Avenatti wants to question Trump and Cohen for "no more than two hours." In the filing, he says the depositions are needed to establish if Trump knew about the payment, which Avenatti refers to as a "hush agreement," and if the future president consented to it.
"We're looking for sworn answers from the president and Mr. Cohen about what they knew, when they knew it and what they did about it," Avenatti said.
While he noted that "in every case you always have to be open to settlement," Avenatti said that "at this point we don't see how this case would possibly be settled."
A former businessman, Trump is no stranger to high-stakes litigation, sitting for depositions in contract and defamation lawsuits over the years.
Those interviews show his deep experience in giving statements to lawyers, but also reveal a witness who could be voluble, boastful and, at times, combative.
Georgetown University law professor Naomi Mezey said a deposition presented risks because it is the way to get the president in a vulnerable position. "And President Trump is a particularly vulnerable president," Mezey said.
Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, detailed her alleged 2006 tryst with Trump in a widely watched interview with CBS' 60 Minutes broadcast Sunday. She said she'd had sex with him once, shortly after Melania Trump gave birth to the president's youngest son.
Daniels also said that a man approached her in a Las Vegas parking lot in 2011 when she was with her infant daughter and threatened her with physical harm if she went public with her story.
The interview prompted a flurry of new legal action, with a lawyer for Cohen demanding that Daniels publicly apologize to his client for suggesting Cohen was involved in her intimidation.
Daniels responded by filing a revised federal lawsuit accusing Cohen of defamation.
Cohen has said he paid the $130,000 out of his own pocket and that neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was part of the transaction. Avenatti has argued that the "hush agreement" Daniels signed in October 2016 is invalid because it was not signed by Trump.
A hearing before Judge S. James Otero in the federal court's Central District in Los Angeles is set for April 30.
The motion notes that Clinton was deposed while in office in 1998 during Paula Jones' sexual harassment suit. That came after the Supreme Court ruled that a sitting president was not immune from civil litigation on something that happened before taking office and was unrelated to the office.
A Section on 03/29/2018